We performed a comparison between Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform and HPE EVA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's best features are its reliability and stability."
"The high performance of flash storage is especially valuable to us."
"It is robust. It doesn't need too much troubleshooting. It is a good device."
"This is one of the most stable, high-end solutions in this area."
"Storage is the most valuable feature."
"Its resilience is the most valuable."
"This is one of the most reliable and dependable products on the market."
"The most valuable features are external storage virtualization and the 100 percent data guaranteed availability."
"There have been no fail-stop failures for the last five years."
"It is very stable."
"HPE has reliable support for HDD replacement."
"The software has always been lagging a bit compared to the newer features. It usually takes a cycle for it to catch up."
"The life-cycle of the Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform G Series is too short. We only had approximately four or five years out of the solution before it was rendered its end of life."
"If they had a certain approach to layered storage, it would be better. For example, adaption to the browser, or having a centralized console."
"In terms of ransomware, Pure Storage is probably a couple of steps ahead of Hitachi, but Hitachi does not rush in terms of features. They want to be really sure that the hardware works properly without any kind of problem in new environments, and the implementation or improvement does not affect the customer installation. They really want to make sure that customers are not affected in any way."
"Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform needs to improve its scalability options where there are a few shortcomings."
"I would like to see an audit account set up such that the user can log in, see the configuration, and see the logs, but they cannot make any changes."
"One improvement I am hoping for in the next release is unified storage."
"The pricing is high, but the product is good. Additional features like data duplication might make it even better."
"Performance could probably be improve with faster controllers, but it is already an old device. We do have performance problems now, but it is a rather old device, so we have what we have."
More Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform is ranked 4th in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) with 48 reviews while HPE EVA is ranked 9th in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform is rated 8.4, while HPE EVA is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform writes "Leverages a 3DC architecture with VSP for disaster recovery, offering a 100% data availability guarantee". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE EVA writes "There is reliable support for HDD replacement". Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform is most compared with IBM FlashSystem, Dell PowerStore, NetApp AFF, Dell Unity XT and Huawei OceanStor Dorado, whereas HPE EVA is most compared with HPE 3PAR StoreServ and HPE StorageWorks MSA. See our HPE EVA vs. Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform report.
See our list of best Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) vendors.
We monitor all Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
