We performed a comparison between Hitachi ID Privileged Access Manager [EOL] and One Identity Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM)."If you using IGA or access controls solutions then this solution is a good addon. Once Hitachi ID Privileged Access Manager is set up it does not require a lot of maintenance or attention."
"We have been able to make our help desk self-sufficient by giving them role-based access. We have been able to reduce service dependency by 40% to 50%."
"We no longer keep users who shouldn't exist."
"This solution is quite flexible. We have a lot of customization since we have our own business processes."
"The most valuable features are centralized Identity Management, robust Access Governance, and One Identity Manager workflow automation."
"In terms of the most valuable feature of One Identity Manager, it's not like one feature is useful without the other features. It's not a tool, but it's more an overall integrated solution that is helpful and not specifically one solution on its own. The best points of One Identity Manager would be its process orchestration and synchronization manager."
"In terms of what I found most valuable in One Identity Manager, it's the only product where the workflow and the catalog can be configured on roles or by business people. You don't need to know the technology at all to configure that, so this is the product's biggest advantage as well as its strongest feature. One Identity Manager is also business-oriented and IAM administrator-oriented."
"The company policies feature is really good because in workflows you can check whether the policies are all working."
"It has many features which can be combined and configured in a great way, then put together in projects and ways that developers didn't think were possible, which has been great."
"Hitachi ID Privileged Access Manager is cumbersome and it does not operate by itself and relies on other solutions. Overall the way you configure things is a bit awkward compared to other solutions, such as Cyberark and Thycotic. The interface could be more intuitive, some features I expected to be easily accessible I had to search around for them. There needs to be more centralization."
"The solution should come up with a lighter version so people can buy different versions."
"I would like to have more advanced features and reporting added to One Identity Manager."
"It should be able to give a client version of the product, rather than just a web-portal."
"I would like them to enhance the search functionality to enable faster processing when looking for objects."
"I would like to have more extensive out-of-the-box reports."
"Their technical support's attitude is a bit strange. Quite often, we have to prove that there is a problem with the product rather than having them prove that there is not a problem with the product."
"They should offer more best practices and documentation for every functionality."
"The tool to develop the web portal needs improvement."
More Hitachi ID Privileged Access Manager [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Hitachi ID Privileged Access Manager [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Privileged Access Management (PAM) while One Identity Manager is ranked 3rd in Identity Management (IM) with 75 reviews. Hitachi ID Privileged Access Manager [EOL] is rated 7.0, while One Identity Manager is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Hitachi ID Privileged Access Manager [EOL] writes "Responsive support, requires little maintenance, but configuration could be easier". On the other hand, the top reviewer of One Identity Manager writes "The JML is customizable but the support team isn't strong". Hitachi ID Privileged Access Manager [EOL] is most compared with , whereas One Identity Manager is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, Oracle Identity Governance, EVOLVEUM midPoint, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) and ForgeRock.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.