Fortinet FortiPortal vs Red Hat CloudForms comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Fortinet Logo
490 views|380 comparisons
80% willing to recommend
Red Hat Logo
4,661 views|4,236 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiPortal and Red Hat CloudForms based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about AlgoSec, Tufin, Palo Alto Networks and others in Firewall Security Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Firewall Security Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The documentation has been satisfactory.""The customer likes it for the graphs, the dynamics and the reporting functionality it offers.""The role-based access controls give us granular control over what features to present to a customer, and the integration into FortiAnalyzer is the most valuable feature.""The firewall and site-blocking features are valuable.""I like the tool's controller facility.""I like the product's asset management which gives clear hardware details.""It does a little bit better than some of the other products health-wise and updates-wise. It is really clear that a firewall is getting the signature updates in this timeframe. In some of the other products, usually, you have to go a couple of screens in to see that, but not so much in this product.""The most valuable feature of this solution is application control."

More Fortinet FortiPortal Pros →

"The most valuable features of Red Hat CloudForms are the benefit of the collective functionality.""I am impressed with the product's reports.""The multi-tenancy feature has been very helpful for our clients. It has been working fine and seamlessly for them. Its interface is also very simplified, and it is also an open and easy-to-scale solution.""Red Hat CloudForms is a stable product. There is no issue with the stability.""Red Hat CloudForms is stable once it is up and running.""The optimization of the solution is quite interesting.""They are a very mature product.""The stability of the solution is very good. We haven't had any issues with it."

More Red Hat CloudForms Pros →

Cons
"I find their logging a little bit trickier to manage. The logging of events is broken up into a lot of different categories. Instead of breaking up my logs into several different places, I personally like to have all the events in one spot and then filter them down. In particular, I find that troubleshooting on Fortinet takes a little bit longer just because of those functional breakups in the logs.""Fingerprint access security would improve this solution.""The product must have in-built SD-WAN connectivity.""There can be defects in Fortinet FortiPortal when functioning at high temperatures.""If you are a very small company or a person on your own, it's harder to get any response from technical support.""It's useful for us but if it had more educational reporting, it would good. It's not necessarily lacking but it's an area that could get better.""The solution is more expensive than other products.""So if it's more than a thousand, there could be some scalability issues. It becomes more complex as you go."

More Fortinet FortiPortal Cons →

"I have issues with the solution's permissions. Unlike VMware, the product doesn't allow folder-type permissions.""It is difficult to create a complete dashboard that includes all the needed features or catalogs.""Red Hat CloudForms could improve by allowing more customization of reports. We have to do a lot of coding to accomplish what we want. Additionally, the compatibility with the multi-cloud could improve. The latter versions of the solution removed Google support and the cost comparison between other clouds was high.""The complexity of the solution is a bit high in comparison to VMware.""The problem is that the platform requires it to be maintained and updated. Also, a few cases are still pending with the Red Hat support team since they are not closed yet.""Because the solution needs to integrate with other products that surround it, there is a lot of configuration required, and this can be quite complex. It's not as easy as it is with, for example, VMware.""The solution's provisioning engine needs to be improved.""The solution is still quite immature."

More Red Hat CloudForms Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I am satisfied with the pricing for this solution."
  • "Fortinet FortiPortal is relatively expensive, but being an industry-leading firewall, it does come with a cost."
  • "The price of the solution is reasonable."
  • "On average, it tends to be cheaper than other enterprise solutions."
  • "Fortinet FortiPortal is not expensive."
  • "Fortinet FortiPortal is expensive in Pakistan."
  • "The licensing costs attached to the solution make it an expensive product."
  • "The solution is quite expensive."
  • More Fortinet FortiPortal Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It is definitely cheaper than VMware. Everything is included. There is no challenge there."
  • "The price of Red Hat CloudForms was not competitive, it was expensive."
  • "Red Hat CloudForms has a subscript-based pricing model. The cost is approximately $20,000 annually which allows you to use as many users as you want."
  • "The product's licensing is based on the number of servers."
  • "Red Hat CloudForms is a bit expensive."
  • More Red Hat CloudForms Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewall Security Management solutions are best for your needs.
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The firewall and site-blocking features are valuable.
    Top Answer:The product must have in-built SD-WAN connectivity. A central logging platform must be integrated with the tool. Instead of being a standalone product, it must be merged with the platform to make a… more »
    Top Answer:I am impressed with the product's reports.
    Top Answer:I have issues with the solution's permissions. Unlike VMware, the product doesn't allow folder-type permissions.
    Top Answer:I would rate the product a four out of ten since its implementation is not as good as it sounds.
    Ranking
    Views
    490
    Comparisons
    380
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    433
    Rating
    7.9
    7th
    out of 75 in Cloud Management
    Views
    4,661
    Comparisons
    4,236
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    392
    Rating
    6.2
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    FortiPortal
    Learn More
    Overview

    FortiPortal gives MSPs a comprehensive set of hosted Wi-Fi and security management features for FortiGate, FortiWiFi, and FortiAP products. With multitenancy, you can securely manage your customers through a centralized management console. This lets you respond quickly to customer requests and easily monitor customer networks. Our virtual appliance can be deployed on a hosted services infrastructure, allowing you to build highly-customized private-cloud services for customers.

    Manage container, virtual, private, and public cloud infrastructures

    Managing a complex, hybrid IT environment can require multiple management tools, redundant policy implementations, and extra staff to handle the operations. Red Hat® CloudForms simplifies IT, providing unified management and operations in a hybrid environment.

    As your IT infrastructure progresses from traditional virtualization toward an Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) model, CloudForms evolves, protecting your investments and providing consistent user experience and functionality.

    Sample Customers
    Black Gold Regional Schools, Amadeus Hospitality, Jefferson County, Chunghwa Telecom, City of Boroondara, Dimension Data
    Cox Automotive, Penn State, FICO, G-ABLE, Seneca College, ITandTEL, The Paris Lodron University of Salzburg (PLUS), MyRepublic, Macquarie, The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, CBTS, Network Data Solutions (NDS)
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Government9%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Construction Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider24%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Media Company12%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business80%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise49%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business36%
    Large Enterprise64%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise68%
    Buyer's Guide
    Firewall Security Management
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about AlgoSec, Tufin, Palo Alto Networks and others in Firewall Security Management. Updated: April 2024.
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Fortinet FortiPortal is ranked 10th in Firewall Security Management with 10 reviews while Red Hat CloudForms is ranked 7th in Cloud Management with 10 reviews. Fortinet FortiPortal is rated 7.8, while Red Hat CloudForms is rated 6.4. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiPortal writes "Suitable for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and offers role-based access controls for granular control ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat CloudForms writes "Easily integrates with various out-of-the-box or third-party vendors". Fortinet FortiPortal is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate Cloud, Palo Alto Networks Panorama, VMware Aria Operations, vCloud Director and CloudStack, whereas Red Hat CloudForms is most compared with Morpheus, VMware Aria Automation, vCloud Director, OpenNebula and IBM Cloud Automation Manager.

    We monitor all Firewall Security Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.