We performed a comparison between Flowgear and Mule Anypoint Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The Flowgear tool is helping us reduce the manual work that is done."
"The no-code visual front end, along with pre-built samples, allows someone with very little technical ability to get an integration up and running."
"The solution has increased efficiency and productivity and saved us time and money."
"Great for data flow."
"Well-managed version control of workflows and the simplicity in promoting workflows through each environment has aided my team in developing workflows for various environments without the risk of losing development work."
"It has improved our integration with our data supplier."
"Being able to seamlessly make changes to how one can do mapping visually without having to be a seasoned developer is great."
"MuleSoft offers with the Anypoint Platform a unified platform for API management and an integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) as well as an on-premise Enterprise Service Bus pattern."
"The ability to define multi-tiered APIs and reuse them is a fantastic platform feature."
"The tool is very capable and offers a high performance. The tool supports batch processing and ETL processing."
"The product is very user-friendly."
"The integration potential is excellent."
"This is the easiest and best tool available."
"It is very easy to use for building connectors. It comes with a lot of connectors. For example, it has different adapters for NetSuite, which are very easy to use. It also has Salesforce connectors. The object store feature is also really easy to use. Mule Anypoint Platform is also good in terms of performance and how it is managed behind the scenes."
"When we talk about the APIs, there are multiple policies one can apply on APIs, like rate limiting policies, OWASP policies, and OWASP security policies, that can be easily configured in Mule Anypoint Platform."
"The UI could be improved."
"The software itself needs to keep up with the daily demand to service all clients as the need arises."
"Currently, when designing and testing larger workflows, the sessions timeout and re-authentications are frequently required."
"The product would be nice if it could provide the deployment features in the lower packages."
"The product needs to improve the self-help tools and samples."
"The initial setup was a bit complex as we were new."
"We would like to see more learning videos for beginners."
"It should give better control over account management."
"This becomes an expensive solution over time."
"Mule should have better B2B integration."
"I would like to see some data integration and automation."
"Technical support needs to be improved, especially when you need help with more technical aspects of the solution."
"The price could be improved."
"Better documentation, in particular with respect to the initial setup, would be helpful."
"Code quality, Code Security, SaaS, and DaaS security, can all be improved."
Flowgear is ranked 10th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 7 reviews while Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 1st in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 40 reviews. Flowgear is rated 9.6, while Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Flowgear writes "Great features, effortless integrations and offers an enhanced experience for users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". Flowgear is most compared with , whereas Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Process Orchestration and SAP Cloud Platform. See our Flowgear vs. Mule Anypoint Platform report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.