We performed a comparison between Elastic Security and VIPRE Endpoint Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Datadog, Wazuh and others in Log Management."It is the best open-source product for people working in SO, managing and analyzing logs."
"The solution is quite stable. The performance has been good."
"The indexes allow you to get your results quickly. The filtering and log passing is the advantage of Logstash."
"The cost is reasonable. It's not overly pricey."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to collect authentication information from service providers."
"The most valuable features of Elastic Security are it is open-source and provides a high level of security."
"We like Elastic Security because it's a REST API-based solution. That's the primary reason we use it."
"Elastic is straightforward, easy to integrate, and highly customizable."
"It has low overhead as far as machine resources are concerned. Everything runs faster with VIPRE installed versus some of the competitors. It has also been pretty easy to use. It just runs and gives us reports. It also sends us alerts when there is something that we need to look at. It does its job, and you just look at the reports. In other ways, you just forget that it is there."
"In general, it was pretty easy to manage."
"This solution is very hard to implement."
"In terms of improvement, there could be more automation in responding to and evaluating detections."
"The solution does not have a UI and this is one of the reasons we are looking for another solution."
"If the documentation were improved and made more clear for beginners, or even professionals, then we would be more attracted to this solution."
"Elastic Security can be a bit difficult to use if a person only has experience in SMBs with tools like Zoho. The product can also be difficult for those who have never dealt with query language."
"This solution cannot do predictive maintenance, so we have to build our own modules for doing it."
"Better integration with third-party APMs would be really good."
"The price of this product could be improved, especially the additional costs. I would also like to see better-quality graphics."
"Their management interface is a little buggy. It requires a few system resources on the management interface. Its reporting can also be better. Overall, the reports are pretty good. They patch some third-party software, but if they can expand what they do for reporting and patch enterprise software, it would be handy."
"We would get a lot of false positives and instead of them fixing the false positive, they would just want us to put in an exception, which I didn't care for."
Elastic Security is ranked 5th in Log Management with 58 reviews while VIPRE Endpoint Security is ranked 59th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP). Elastic Security is rated 7.6, while VIPRE Endpoint Security is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Elastic Security writes "A stable and scalable tool that provides visibility along with the consolidation of logs to its users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VIPRE Endpoint Security writes "Easy to deploy, good price, low overhead, and keeps our Servers and PC's free of virus'". Elastic Security is most compared with Wazuh, Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel, IBM Security QRadar and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, whereas VIPRE Endpoint Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Microsoft Defender for Business, CrowdStrike Falcon, Fortinet FortiEDR and Intercept X Endpoint.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
