We performed a comparison between Elastic Security and ESET Endpoint Protection Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Enables monitoring of application performance and the ability to predict behaviors."
"Elastic has a lot of beats, such as Winlogbeat and Filebeat. Beats are the agents that have to be installed on the terminals to send the data. When we install beats or Elastic agents on every terminal, they don't overload the terminals. In other SIEM solutions such as Splunk or QRadar, when beats or agents are installed on endpoints, they are very heavy for the terminals. They consume a lot of power of the terminals, whereas Elastic agents hardly consume any power and don't overload the terminals."
"It is very quick to react. I can set it to check anomalies or suspicious behavior every 30 seconds. It is very fast."
"I like the indexing of the logs."
"It can handle millions of loads at a time, and you can always use the filters to find exactly what you are looking for and detect errors in every log message you are searching for, basically."
"ELK documentation is very good, so never needed to contact technical support."
"The solution is compatible with the cloud-native environment and they can adapt to it faster."
"Elastic Security is a highly flexible platform that can be implemented anywhere."
"The solution has very useful MDM features."
"They do a program where you can renew for three years. It's very reasonable, as far as the cost per year, because you can renew for three years. They will also do multiple computers, so I actually protect all my family computers, as well as my work computers, all under one license. This means I only have to deal with re-upping my license once every three years. That's the big thing for me."
"The most valuable thing for me is that when I'm using the internet and I reach some site that isn't so secure, or isn't recommended because they don't have a good reputation, ESET will notify me."
"The solution is very lightweight and does not consume that much processor in terms of CPU utilization. The centralized management system is very good."
"The most valuable features for me in ESET Endpoint Security are the antivirus feature and detection."
"It can block certain web pages that may contain viruses or pose a threat to the computer."
"The stability is great."
"The tools and the features available with this solution are very competitive. It is always updated to prevent upcoming attacks."
"They don't provide user authentication and authorisation features (Shield) as a part of their open-source version."
"The solution's query building is not that intuitive compared to other solutions."
"It could use maybe a little more on the Linux side."
"In terms of what could be improved with Elastic, in some use cases, especially on the advanced level, they are not ready made, so you'll have to write some scripts."
"The price of this product could be improved, especially the additional costs. I would also like to see better-quality graphics."
"Email notification should be done the same way as Logentries does it."
"This solution cannot do predictive maintenance, so we have to build our own modules for doing it."
"The solution could offer better reporting features."
"I would like for ESET to create a central management solution. This would make it practical to use the internet for medium-sized networks."
"I don't know if it's possible but I'm always looking for better protection."
"The management of the solution isn't as clear as it could be. They could adjust that to make it a better product."
"ESET should consider giving it application control."
"They can improve ransomware protection, and there should be cloud sandboxing for Mac."
"Everything has some kind of room for improvement."
"The solution could improve by having higher-level security and reporting."
"Dual management for the customer, who needs to access the local on-premise console from a remote cloud-based console."
More ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
Elastic Security is ranked 5th in Log Management with 58 reviews while ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is ranked 9th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 96 reviews. Elastic Security is rated 7.6, while ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Elastic Security writes "A stable and scalable tool that provides visibility along with the consolidation of logs to its users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ESET Endpoint Protection Platform writes "Easy to set up with good security and rapidly improving capabilities". Elastic Security is most compared with Wazuh, Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel, IBM Security QRadar and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, whereas ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity Complete and Check Point Harmony Endpoint. See our ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Elastic Security report.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
