We performed a comparison between Dataloader.io and Informatica Cloud Data Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), MuleSoft, Matillion and others in Cloud Data Integration."he product’s most valuable feature is ease of access."
"The support is very good."
"It is quite easy to use and flexible."
"The program is stable and scalable."
"The serverless capability and the packaging application of the solution are valuable."
"The most valuable feature is the building of mockups and tasks."
"Informatica Cloud Data Integration is stable."
"The Mapping Designer allows for declarative ETL development (visual scripting) that leverages a wide array of different transformations."
"Their new licensing is very flexible. With Informatica Cloud, you have plenty of items under the same umbrella, such as services, offerings, data quality, and data masking. You have also got master data management and API management. What I really like about them is that you don't need to go to Informatica and say that you need a data integration module. You would say that you need iPaaS or Informatica Cloud. They'll then try to understand your needs and give you IPUs, which are the processing units. If I purchased a hundred IPUs from Informatica as a customer, I can use 70 IPUs for data integration. I would also need data quality, so I can use 10 IPUs for data quality. I can use the remaining 20 IPUs for API management. Down the line, if I see that my initial data integration needs for the development phase are met, then out of the 70 IPUs assigned for data integration, I can use 30 IPUs for data masking. I can shuffle these numbers in any way within the Informatica Cloud umbrella for the tenure for which I have subscribed to these IPUs. I can use all services the way I want. This flexibility is what I really love about Informatica. It also has got good connectors."
"We need help with large data migrations. It only works well for a few thousand records or less than a million records."
"The main issue preventing Brazilian companies from migrating to Informatica Cloud Data Integration from on-prem is the price."
"There are a small number of UI bugs that occur on occasion."
"Connectivity could be improved, it can be a little slow."
"The error information provided is not informative, as compared to Power Center."
"With the solution, we had some issues, and we have every day, and we used to open a ticket. Sometimes, there are data issues and transformation issues."
"Informatica Cloud Data Integration can improve by being more user-friendly. When you're working with the solution a lot of technical knowledge is required. It's not a solution that anyone can use properly, you need knowledge of what's happening at the back end, such as SQL. When you get stuck, you need to look into your logic. For other tools, such as Dell Boomi, anyone can use them."
"Error reporting and debugging need improvement."
"Certain shortcomings in the product's UI make it an area where improvements are required."
More Informatica Cloud Data Integration Pricing and Cost Advice →
Dataloader.io is ranked 39th in Data Integration with 1 review while Informatica Cloud Data Integration is ranked 5th in Cloud Data Integration with 40 reviews. Dataloader.io is rated 8.0, while Informatica Cloud Data Integration is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Dataloader.io writes "Provides an ease of access and an automated mapping feature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Informatica Cloud Data Integration writes "A stable, scalable, and user-friendly solution". Dataloader.io is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, DBamp and BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS, whereas Informatica Cloud Data Integration is most compared with Informatica PowerCenter, Azure Data Factory, AWS Glue, Fivetran and Mule Anypoint Platform.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.