We performed a comparison between CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault and One Identity Password Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Password Managers solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Security is the solution's most valuable feature. As far as I know, this solution is the most secure system of this class on the market today, even considering another management system like Fudo Security, which we also use. The integration capabilities are very good; it helps strengthen our overall security."
"Password Vault's main advantage is its scalability. We constantly see huge enterprises implementing something like this, and the privileged session management is an excellent piece. You can kind of watch videos of whatever an admin has done."
"The most valuable features of CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault are password vaulting and automatic rotation of passwords after use."
"The interface is very simple to use."
"It's highly secure and very flexible. It gives us all types of storage options and it gives us a high level of security."
"The most valuable feature is privileged session management."
"The solution is highly stable."
"The privileged support manager is the most valuable feature of CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault."
"One Identity Password Manager is a stable solution."
"It does have advantages over the other products that we are seeing. Other products don't have the out-of-the-box OTP option, whereas One Identity Password Manager has the out-of-the-box OTP option. It also has a cloud-based solution for generating OTPs. So, the customers can either opt for their own SMS gateway, or they can use the One Identity OTP option where they don't have to have an SMS gateway. With other products, customers must have their own SMS gateway."
"It is an absolutely scalable solution...The product is easy to install."
"The solution is very customizable."
"It is extremely simple to integrate with various systems, including OTP, passwords, and so on because everything is based on our environment."
"It provides seamless integration with different types of password modules like temporary access passcode and MFA."
"What I found most valuable in One Identity Password Manager is its easy use. It's a flexible solution. It also supports many languages, including Arabic."
"CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault's GUI has certain shortcomings that need improvement."
"The technical support is very poor."
"CyberArk's license is too expensive. I rate it seven out of 10 for affordability."
"The solution is too big and complex for any businesses that are small or medium-sized. They should offer a more compact version or make a solution better suited to smaller businesses."
"The initial setup could be simpler but it may not be as effective."
"The tool's UI has bugs and lags. It needs to be improved. The deployment process can be complex due to multiple components for various functionalities, each requiring separate infrastructure management. To simplify this process, consolidating all these components into a single platform could be beneficial. The product's pricing could be cheaper."
"The session monitoring and recording feature is also a good feature feature, but we're currently experiencing an issue with session monitoring not working correctly. We're working with CyberArk to resolve it. We aren't able to view active sessions or historical recordings of sessions."
"The stability depends on the infrastructure it is installed on, which is important because CyberArk does not have the hardware appliance."
"One Identity Password Manager could improve the integration with other technology, it is complex for integrating. There needs to be more connectors or adapters. There is limited out-of-the-box customization."
"The UI needs improvement to match any other standard password manager because it's not very intuitive right now."
"The improvement required is an increase in the number of people who manage the product's support team."
"The software is complex on the backend, and there isn't enough documentation."
"I would like it to be more secure in terms of password storage."
"An area for improvement in One Identity Password Manager is the management gap since Quest is no longer under Dell, and One Identity is under Quest. The management gap resulted in poor support, which needs improvement."
"If there is a self-service option to update the mobile number, it will be much more useful."
More CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault Pricing and Cost Advice →
More One Identity Password Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault is ranked 4th in Enterprise Password Managers with 48 reviews while One Identity Password Manager is ranked 14th in Enterprise Password Managers with 7 reviews. CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault is rated 8.4, while One Identity Password Manager is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault writes "Helps to store system accounts ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of One Identity Password Manager writes "An easy-to-use tool that offers its users strong security on the password management front ". CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault is most compared with Azure Key Vault, HashiCorp Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, Delinea Secret Server and BeyondTrust Password Safe, whereas One Identity Password Manager is most compared with Azure Key Vault and 1Password. See our CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault vs. One Identity Password Manager report.
See our list of best Enterprise Password Managers vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Password Managers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
