• Home
  • Control-M vs. Hitachi JP1 Automatic Job Management System [EOL]

Control-M vs Hitachi JP1 Automatic Job Management System [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Process Automation
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Control-M and Hitachi JP1 Automatic Job Management System [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Process Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Process Automation Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Pedro Fuentes
Cost-effective, excellent support, and centralized access and control
Helix Control-M is critical for us. If we do not have a job scheduler like this, we will have to have people running 366 different jobs on a daily... Read more →
Use Hitachi JP1 Automatic Job Management System [EOL]?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Compare to other tools Pricing and licensing was more. It should be decrease."
  • "BMC does NOT have a great licensing model from my perspective."
  • "we are more looking for a better cost/license/performance model because BMC, while we could say it's the best, is also the most expensive. That is what we are probably most annoyed with. We are paying something like €1,000,000 over three years for having 4,000 jobs running. That's expensive."
  • "We have account based licensing. There are two or three types of licensing. One of them is based on the number of jobs, so we a license close to 4,000 jobs per day. The cost is based on the different modules, which we buy from them. If we a buy a hardware module, which we are presently using and integrating, that is an additional cost, but I'm not sure of the amount. Each module comes with a different cost."
  • "As we increase the number of tasks or jobs on the system, there are concerns about cost."
  • "We have a five-year contract with task-based licensing."
  • "This product saves hours in a day based on my experience working here versus other companies with manually operations."
  • "It works on task-based licensing."

    • More Control-M Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    How does Control-M compare with AutoSys Workload Automation?
    Top Answer:Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful because nothing gets left unattended since it is all visible in one place, and… more »
    What do you like most about Control-M?
    Top Answer:In Helix Control-M, we have the automation API that allows us to customize and do integrations easily in any script, such as Java or Python. It is all integrated within the integration API.
    Read all 70 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Control-M?
    Top Answer:It is not bad. The company can afford it, and it pays for itself. We have those jobs running automatically.
    Read all 45 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    4th
    out of 66 in Process Automation
    Views
    4,668
    Comparisons
    1,673
    Reviews
    20
    Average Words per Review
    1,502
    Rating
    9.1
    Unranked
    In Process Automation
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Control M
    Hitachi JP1/Automatic Job Management System, JPI, AJS3
    Learn More
    BMC
    Hitachi Vantara
    Overview

    Control-M simplifies application and data workflow orchestration on premises or as a service. It makes it easy to build, define, schedule, manage, and monitor production workflows, ensuring visibility, reliability, and improving SLAs.

    • Accelerate new business applications into production—by embedding workflow orchestration into your CI/CD pipeline
    • Scale Dev and Ops collaboration, with a Jobs-as-Code approach
    • Simplify workflows across hybrid and multi-cloud environments with AWS, Azure and Google Cloud Platform integrations
    • Deliver data-driven outcomes faster, managing big data workflows in a scalable way
    • Take control of your file transfer operations with integrated, intelligent file movement and visibility

    JP1/Automatic Job Management System 3 allows you to automate and optimize various business operations to achieve a system that is highly consistent and reliable. It allows you to automate, on a predefined schedule, day-to-day tasks such as calculating payroll and aggregating sales data. You can even automate one-time tasks and tasks where the task results determine which task is executed next. You can ensure that tasks are executed properly by defining jobs via intuitive operations, executing tasks according to a detailed job schedule, and monitoring tasks to quickly understand the status of execution.

    Sample Customers
    CARFAX, Tampa General Hospital, Navistar, Amadeus, Raymond James, Railinc
    Nikon (Thailand), China Netcom (Group) Company Limited Jilin Branch, Noritz (China) Investment Co., Canon Zhuhai, Omron (Shanghai) Co., Shanghai Daikin Air Conditioning Co., Meitetsucom
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm34%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Retailer9%
    Healthcare Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm29%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Insurance Company7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business11%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise80%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise76%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Process Automation
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Process Automation. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Control-M is ranked 4th in Process Automation with 110 reviews while Hitachi JP1 Automatic Job Management System [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Process Automation. Control-M is rated 8.8, while Hitachi JP1 Automatic Job Management System [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Control-M writes "We have seen quicker file transfers with more visibility and stability". On the other hand, Control-M is most compared with AutoSys Workload Automation, IBM Workload Automation, Rocket Zena, ESP Workload Automation Intelligence and Automic Workload Automation, whereas Hitachi JP1 Automatic Job Management System [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

    We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.