Code42 Incydr vs McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Code42 Incydr and McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Code42 Incydr vs. McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It has quite a bit of flexibility in configuring backup sets.""Works in the background and users are able to perform restores.""Backup and recovery have been great, but I love having the ability to keep the hybrid type build which they offer.""Code42 Next-Gen DLP is scalable.""Low system overhead, setting retention policies, ease of use""Security tools: Being able to monitor data going in and coming off our endpoints. Seeing what it is and where it's going is awesome.""Risk factors can be adjusted for all intricate details.""t has a very user friendly status bar with common errors and has logs built in to the console so we can review the issues or status of CrashPlan."

More Code42 Incydr Pros →

"The most valuable features of McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention are the DLP. The DLP, data loss prevention is the most important feature right now that users are looking for.""The ability to block all USBs from the McAfee portal has been great.""The product is largely stable.""The overall features of McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention are very good.""The administrative capabilities and the interface make this product accessible and easy to use.""The stability of the solution can be good. However, the configuration takes a long time for it to be done properly.""This solution has a rich set of policies.""What I like about McAfee Total Protection is that it's working. I also like that it doesn't require any specific knowledge to set up."

More McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention Pros →

Cons
"In a couple of instances, we had a little bit of trouble in getting it distributed throughout the organization. We ultimately managed to do it, but they talk about it being a pretty simple process, and it became a little laborious. It would just turn away. The agents were not being distributed. It was just churning and churning and churning. When we were looking for specific categories of data, it was getting bogged down, but that was not even so much Code42, although some of it was their issue.""Java, please get rid of Java.""I think one we can improve is the compression.""There doesn't seem to be any feature that is lacking.""What I think could be improved is how I get support.""You can't always filter out data that you'd like to.""The application, written in Java, required far more system resources on a Client than other solutions.""​Due to recent changes that effectively abandoned an entire segment of their user base, I no longer trust nor can recommend Code42 products."

More Code42 Incydr Cons →

"Integration with other vendors could be improved. For example, with Chrome or Firefox.""It could improve how it deals with solar data.""When this solution is used it requires a lot of administration because the users can have difficulties using it and require assistance. The administrators are continuously modifying the policies for the users. Technical support will be used frequently.""I would like the solution to improve the AI features for anti-virus detection. I also want the software to include a tool for malware detection.""The solution takes up too much CPU and memory.""There needs to be support for blocking the sending of files by email because even if you block or remove an external disk, the files are not protected.""The user interface is messy and could be simplified.""Lacks GDPR regulations to enhance security."

More McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "They were the best solution and surprisingly enough, the cheapest."
  • "It is 100% worth the cost to get and keep the support, especially when setting it up."
  • "It used to be a good solution for SOHO in particular as it had unlimited storage for a reasonable price. However, their pricing model has changed and they are now primarily targeting enterprise users."
  • "The pricing is reasonable. It's my understanding that the cost is about $7 for unlimited storage in the cloud per server."
  • "It was expensive. It was more expensive than Eureka, and it was more expensive than Barracuda Backup, but what we got was a full team. They didn't come in and nickel and dime us. They provided the assistance we needed. They didn't say that they need to charge us for something or it is going to take another statement of work. It was all bundled into it... We pay for the software maintenance. It is probably 18% or 20% of the license fee for rev releases."
  • More Code42 Incydr Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The pricing seems expensive both for the license and the support."
  • "The price is high for this type of product."
  • "If the client purchases the entire suite of McAfee Endpoint, the license is included."
  • "Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."
  • "There is an annual license to use this solution."
  • "It's not a cheap option."
  • "I'm paying the license for McAfee Total Protection yearly. It could be cheaper, but it's fine."
  • "The price of McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is expensive. It is not the most expensive solution but it is typically 15 to 20 percent higher than other solutions. There is no additional cost to using McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention."
  • More McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Risk factors can be adjusted for all intricate details.
    Top Answer:In a couple of instances, we had a little bit of trouble in getting it distributed throughout the organization. We ultimately managed to do it, but they talk about it being a pretty simple process… more »
    Top Answer:When I first became acquainted with Code42, we were implementing it at an employer I worked with, and that was a successful implementation. I now work for a consulting firm, and we do system… more »
    Top Answer:The tool focuses on endpoints rather than networks. Endpoints cover everything. It wouldn't be possible to steal confidential information from endpoints.
    Top Answer:McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is expensive.
    Ranking
    Views
    621
    Comparisons
    456
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    1,697
    Rating
    8.5
    Views
    1,149
    Comparisons
    670
    Reviews
    16
    Average Words per Review
    342
    Rating
    7.9
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Code42 Next-Gen DLP, Code42 Next-Gen Data Loss Protection, Code42 Forensic File Search, Code42 Backup + Restore
    McAfee Total Protection for Data, McAfee Total Protection for DLP, Total Protection for Data, Intel Security Total Protection for Data
    Learn More
    Overview

    Detect file exfiltration via web browsers, USB, cloud apps, email, file link sharing, Airdrop, and more. See how files are moved and shared across your entire organization – without the need for policies, proxies or plugins. Incydr automatically identifies when files move outside your trusted environment, allowing you to easily detect when files are sent to personal accounts and unmanaged devices.

    Incydr prioritizes file activity based on 120+ contextual Incydr Risk Indicators (IRIs). This prioritization works on day 1 without any configuration. Incydr’s risk scoring logic is use case-driven and transparent to administrators. Incydr uses Watchlists to programmatically protect data from employees who are most likely to leak or steal files, such as departing employees.

    Take action with appropriate responses to contain, resolve and educate on detected risk. Use Incydr Flows or SOAR integrations to initiate response controls that are proportionate to an activity’s risk severity. You’ll stop data leaks without getting in the way of employee collaboration and sanctioned file activity.

    Improving your Insider Risk posture requires a change in employee behavior. Code42 Instructor provides bite-sized training to employees, delivered when they need it. Use Instructor in tandem with Incydr to send responsive video lessons when employees put data at risk. You’ll ensure appropriate data governance and compliance with security standards and corporate policies as well as report on the positive impact of your Insider Risk Management program.

    Founded in 2001, the company is headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota, and backed by Accel Partners, JMI Equity, NEA, and Split Rock Partners. For more information, visit code42.com.

    McAfee Total Protection for Data solution suite protects your data using a combination of powerful encryption, access control, and user-behavior monitoring.
    Sample Customers
    Adobe, Okta, Samsung, Taylormade, Boston University, Lending Club, North Highland, Stanford University, Ping Identity, Qualcomm, Pandora.
    Kleberg Bank
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    University18%
    Healthcare Company11%
    Media Company8%
    Real Estate/Law Firm8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Educational Organization6%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm33%
    Security Firm13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Healthcare Company6%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise31%
    Large Enterprise38%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise60%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business61%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise25%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Buyer's Guide
    Code42 Incydr vs. McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Code42 Incydr vs. McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Code42 Incydr is ranked 15th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 78 reviews while McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is ranked 9th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 29 reviews. Code42 Incydr is rated 9.0, while McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Code42 Incydr writes "Provides comprehensive visibility and protection, helps in identifying the gaps in security, and comes with excellent onboarding support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention writes "Highly beneficial DLP functionality, full system protection, and useful file scanning". Code42 Incydr is most compared with Threat Detection, Investigation & Response (TDIR) Platform, Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, Morphisec and Backup and Restore for SharePoint & Microsoft Office 365, whereas McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, HP Wolf Security, Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention, Cisco Secure Endpoint and Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention. See our Code42 Incydr vs. McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention report.

    See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

    We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.