We performed a comparison between CloverETL and Informatica Cloud Data Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), MuleSoft, Matillion and others in Cloud Data Integration."No dependence on native language and ease of use."
"Server features for scheduler: It is very easy to schedule jobs and monitor them. The interface is easy to use."
"Key features include wealth of pre-defined components; all components are customizable; descriptive logging, especially for error messages."
"Connectivity to various data sources: The ability to extract data from different data sources gives greater flexibility."
"Data integration is the most valuable feature. The ability to connect to any of the sources and enterprise applications makes our lives easier."
"It has a more UI-based tool, and the scripting is good."
"The most valuable features of the solution are pushdown, optimization, and partitioning, which can be used for frequent data loading, especially when we have a huge data volume in our company."
"The data mapping capability is a valuable feature."
"Data synchronization tasks."
"The most valuable feature of Informatica Cloud Data Integration is Pushback. You are able to push the data to the solution itself, and it can handle the queries. It helps us a lot. With other tools, the burden is kept on the server."
"The serverless capability and the packaging application of the solution are valuable."
"The mass ingestion functionality and the elasticity of the solution are great."
"Needs: easier automated failure recovery; more, and more intuitive auto-generated/filled-in code for components; easier/more automated sync between CloverETL Designer and CloverETL Server."
"Resource management: We typically run out of heap space, and even the allocation of high heap space does not seem to be enough."
"Its documentation could be improved."
"I have received feedback from certain teams and there is a steep learning curve to use this solution."
"The price modeling could be more flexible."
"The biggest challenge I see is the IDE's for the cloud and automization are different."
"One area where Informatica Cloud Data Integration could improve is in providing more accelerators for certain functionalities."
"Its pricing model can be improved. The response time from technical support can also be improved."
"Certain applications are not being synced with the ION."
"The cloud version of the Informatica, it's a very substandard product. They might say it's enterprise-ready but it's not at all ready. They need to add more features, such as improved data replication features. If you look at other tools, such as Matillion they are now cloud-native and flexible. Additionally, Informatica Cloud Data Integration should have a good migration strategy from Informatica PowerCenter to Informatica Cloud Data Integration."
"I would also like to have profiling functionalities and quality transformations in the cloud."
More Informatica Cloud Data Integration Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
CloverETL is ranked 61st in Data Integration while Informatica Cloud Data Integration is ranked 5th in Cloud Data Integration with 40 reviews. CloverETL is rated 7.0, while Informatica Cloud Data Integration is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of CloverETL writes "Provides wealth of pre-defined, customizable components, and descriptive logging for errors". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Informatica Cloud Data Integration writes "A stable, scalable, and user-friendly solution". CloverETL is most compared with SSIS, Talend Open Studio and iWay Universal Adapter Framework, whereas Informatica Cloud Data Integration is most compared with Informatica PowerCenter, Azure Data Factory, AWS Glue, Fivetran and Mule Anypoint Platform.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.