"To me, the most valuable feature of Clarity CA is the timesheet. It's the only feature I use because I just support the tool, and I just enter time on it. Others use Clarity CA for other purposes, such as resource management, project management, scheduling, and financials. The tool also has a fairly simple integration with other systems, so at the moment, it's working fine. I also like that you can write your own code in Clarity CA, and you can make changes to it based on your needs."
"The event correlation is the most valuable aspect of the solution."
"Purely, its flexibility is the most valuable aspect. It is hugely configurable."
"The integration with the ticketing tool makes sure that there is a record for every issue."
"The most valuable feature is its ability to integrate with everything."
"I find the Micro Focus Operations Bridge dashboard valuable, including its instrument analysis and anomaly control features that help indicate root causes and problems with your infrastructure."
"The most valuable feature is that everything can be consolidated into one dashboard."
"I've found the solution to be very scalable."
"The preloaded rules and ways to monitor your systems are a must."
"What could be improved in Clarity CA is its UI, but I know the Clarity team is working on a new UI, so I'm expecting its UI to get better. The software also has too many functions, so it would be good if the functions or features could be split up, rather than needing to buy the whole Clarity CA package, when you'll only use a few of its functions. This increases the cost of the software, so that's another area for improvement. How Clarity CA is marketed could also be improved."
"The pricing could be improved."
"The initial setup of this tool is complex for people who lack experience with it."
"It is a very complicated product. It's difficult to manage. Nowadays, products are very easy to manage, deploy, and integrate, but Operations Bridge is very complicated to manage."
"We are waiting for quicker release cycles. Also containerized upgrade, so that you don't have to bring a system entirely down to make a minor upgrade, in fact, or a minor patch."
"The latest versions of the service reporting dashboards need improvement, such as service modeling."
"pology-based event correlation does not work well with NNM events."
"Installing and upgrading the HPOM and Operations Agent software is not always easy and the process can be quite fragile. Once it is running, it is very quick and stable, but an upgrade can quite easily break something or terminate unexpectedly."
"Implementation could be improved."
Clarity CA is ranked 3rd in Client Desktop Management with 2 reviews while OpenText Operations Bridge is ranked 8th in Event Monitoring with 44 reviews. Clarity CA is rated 8.0, while OpenText Operations Bridge is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Clarity CA writes "Multipurpose and useful for managing projects and resources; easy to integrate with other systems, and has a knowledgeable technical support team". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Operations Bridge writes "Good event correlation capabilities, promotes a self-service approach to monitoring". Clarity CA is most compared with , whereas OpenText Operations Bridge is most compared with SCOM, OpsRamp, Splunk Enterprise Security, BMC Helix Monitor and IDERA SQL Diagnostic Manager for SQL Server.
We monitor all Client Desktop Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
