We performed a comparison between Cisco Secure Workload and McAfee MOVE AntiVirus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud and Data Center Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution offers 100% telemetry coverage. The telemetry you collect is not sampled, it's not intermittent. It's complete. You see everything in it, including full visibility of all activities on your endpoints and in your network."
"A complete and powerful micro-segmentation solution."
"By using Tetration insight, we are able to get the latency on our level accounts and we can determine whatever the issue is with the application latency itself."
"Instead of proving that all the access control lists are in place and all the EPGs are correct, we can just point the auditor to a dashboard and point out that there aren't any escaped conversations. It saves an enormous, enormous amount of time."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is security."
"It's stable."
"Scalability is its most valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that we don't have to do packet captures on the network."
"One of the most valuable features is the performance. It's very stable."
"MOVE AntiVirus's best feature is its ease of use."
"The most valuable feature is the protection we have had over the years."
"We receive great technical support."
"McAfee provides a console which is very flexible, usable and user-friendly."
"I have found the most valuable feature of McAfee MOVE AntiVirus to be the ease of use."
"The solution is reasonably priced."
"The solution is fast."
"The multi-tenancy, redundancy, backup and restore functionalities, as well as the monitoring aspects of the solution, need improvement. The solution offers virtually no enterprise-grade possibility for monitoring."
"There is some overlap between Cisco Tetration and AppDynamics and I need to have a single pane of glass, rather than have to jump between different tools."
"It is not so easy to use and configure. It needs a bunch of further resources to work, which is mainly the biggest downside of it. The deployment is huge."
"It is highly scalable, but there is a limitation that it is only available on Cisco devices."
"The integration could be better, especially with different types of solutions."
"The product must be integrated with the cloud."
"It has an uninviting interface."
"There was a controversy when Cisco reduced the amount of data they kept, and the solution became quite cost-intensive, which made its adoption challenging….Although they have modified it now, I preferred the previous version, and I wish all the functionality were back under the same product."
"It would be very helpful if a significant reduction in overhead could be brought about."
"The solution’s stability and licensing price could be improved."
"The performance of this product could be improved."
"McAfee MOVE AntiVirus’s initial setup was complex."
"The user interface of McAfee MOVE AntiVirus could benefit from some improvements. The excessive pop-ups can be bothersome, particularly when sharing my screen online, as I often get interrupted by the notifications. While I understand there is an option to disable these pop-ups, I feel that it should be disabled by default. Although I appreciate the overall design of the graphical user interface, the constant interruptions detract from the user experience."
"The performance is not very good."
"The security feature should be more secure."
"The threat protection could be improved."
Cisco Secure Workload is ranked 9th in Cloud and Data Center Security with 13 reviews while McAfee MOVE AntiVirus is ranked 13th in Anti-Malware Tools with 79 reviews. Cisco Secure Workload is rated 8.4, while McAfee MOVE AntiVirus is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Secure Workload writes "A solution that provides good technical support but its high cost makes it challenging for users to adopt it". On the other hand, the top reviewer of McAfee MOVE AntiVirus writes "Centralized system, less stress on the network and runs smoothly". Cisco Secure Workload is most compared with Akamai Guardicore Segmentation, Illumio, VMware NSX, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and Cisco ACI, whereas McAfee MOVE AntiVirus is most compared with Quick Heal Total Security, Trend Micro Deep Security, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon and VMware NSX. See our Cisco Secure Workload vs. McAfee MOVE AntiVirus report.
We monitor all Cloud and Data Center Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
