Checkmarx One vs HCL AppScan vs Klocwork comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Checkmarx Logo
34,421 views|22,385 comparisons
86% willing to recommend
HCLTech Logo
5,423 views|4,191 comparisons
82% willing to recommend
Perforce Logo
3,452 views|2,086 comparisons
91% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Checkmarx One, HCL AppScan, and Klocwork based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Security Tools Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution has good performance, it is able to compute in 10 to 15 minutes.""The SAST component was absolutely 100% stable.""Both automatic and manual code review (CxQL) are valuable.""Our static operation security has been able to identify more security issues since implementing this solution.""The solution improved the efficiency of our code security reviews. It helps tremendously because it finds hundreds of potential problems sometimes.""It's not an obstacle for developers. They can easily write their code and make it more secure with Checkmarx.""The features and technologies are very good. The flexibility and the roadmap have also been very good. They're at the forefront of delivering the additional capabilities that are required with cloud delivery, etc. Their ability to deliver what customers require and when they require is very important.""One of the most valuable features is it is flexible."

More Checkmarx One Pros →

"The solution offers services in a few specific development languages.""The static scans are good, and the SaaS as well.""The solution is easy to use.""For me, as a manager, it was the ease of use. Inserting security into the development process is not normally an easy project to do. The ability for the developer to actually use it and get results and focuses, that's what counted.""It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution...The initial setup or installation of HCL AppScan is easy.""It was easy to set up.""There's extensive functionality with custom rules and a custom knowledge base.""We use it as a security testing application."

More HCL AppScan Pros →

"On-the-fly analysis and incremental analysis are the best parts of Klocwork. Currently, we are using both of these features very effectively.""There is a central Klocwork server at our headquarter in France so we connect the client directly to the server on-premises remotely.""It's integrated into our CI, continuous integration.""One can increase the number of vendors, so the solution is scalable.""There's a feature in Klocwork called 'on-the-fly analysis', which helps developers to find and fix the defects at the time of development itself.""The tool helps the team to think beforehand about corner cases or potential bugs that might arise in real-time.""We like using the static analysis and code refactoring, which are very valuable because of our requirements to meet safety critical levels and reliability.""The ability to create custom checkers is a plus."

More Klocwork Pros →

Cons
"The validation process needs to be sped up.""Its pricing model can be improved. Sometimes, it is a little complex to understand its pricing model.""You can't use it in the continuous delivery pipeline because the scanning takes too much time.""The lack of ability to review compiled source code. It would then be able to compete with other scanning tools, such as Veracode.""The reports are good, but they still need to be improved considering what the UI offers.""Checkmarx could improve the REST APIs by including automation.""The solution sometimes reports a false auditable code or false positive.""In terms of dashboarding, the solution could provide a little more flexibility in terms of creating more dashboards. It has some of its own dashboards that come out of the box. However, if I have to implement my own dashboards that are aligned to my organization's requirements, that dashboarding feature has limited capability right now."

More Checkmarx One Cons →

"We would like to integrate with some of the other reporting tools that we're planning to use in the future.""It's a little bit basic when you talk about the Web Services. If AppScan improved its maturity on Web Services testing, that would be good.""I would love to see more containers. Many of the tools are great, they require an amount of configuration, setup and infrastructure. If most the applications were in a container, I think everything would be a little bit faster, because all our clients are now using containers.""Sometimes it doesn't work so well.""I would like to see the roadmap for this product. We are still waiting to see it as we have only so many resources.""They should have a better UI for dashboards.""The solution could improve by having a mobile version.""There are so many lines of code with so many different categories that I am likely to get lost. ​"

More HCL AppScan Cons →

"I hope that in each new release they add new features relating to the addition of checkers, improving their analysis engines etc.""Klocwork does have a problem with true positives. It only found 30% of true positives in the Juliet test case.""We bought Klocwork, but it was limited to one little program, but the program is now sort of failing. So, we have a license for usage on a program that is sort of failing, and we really can't use the license on anything else.""Klocwork has to improve its features to stay ahead of other free solutions.""Under NIST cybersecurity standards, we must address vulnerabilities within a specified time after discovering them. When we try to propagate those updates and fixes through the system, it would be nice if the clients could reconnect to the existing server or have the server dynamically updated in some way. I know that isn't easy, but maybe processes could be enhanced to make that more streamlined from a DevOps perspective.""This solution could be improved if they offered support of more languages including Ada and Golang. They currently only support seven languages.""The main problem is that since it only parses the code, the warnings or the problems that are given as a result of the report can sometimes require a lot of effort to analyze.""Modern languages, such as Angular and .NET, should be included as a part of Klocwork. They have recently added Kotlin as a part of their project, but we would like to see more languages in Klocwork. That's the reason we are using Coverity as a backup for some of the other languages."

More Klocwork Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It is the right price for quality delivery."
  • "I believe pricing is better compared to other commercial tools."
  • "The pricing was not very good. This is just a framework which shouldn’t cost so much."
  • "The pricing is competitive and provides a lower TCO (total cost of ownership) for achieving application security."
  • "It is a good product but a little overpriced."
  • "The license has a vague language around P1 issues and the associated support. Make sure to review these in order to align them with your organizational policies."
  • "​Checkmarx is not a cheap scanning tool, but none of the security tools are cheap. Checkmarx is a powerful scanning tool, and it’s essential to have one of these products."
  • "We got a special offer for a 30% reduction for three years, after our first year. I think for a real source-code scanning tool, you have to add a lot of money for Open Source Analysis, and AppSec Coach (160 Euro per user per year)."
  • More Checkmarx One Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "AppScan is a little bit expensive. IBM needs to work a little bit on the pricing model, decreasing the license cost."
  • "With the features, that they offer, and the support, they offer, AppScan pricing is on a higher level."
  • "Pricing was the main reason that we went ahead with this solution as they were the lowest in the market."
  • "HCL AppScan is expensive."
  • "I would rate the product's pricing a nine out of ten. The product's pricing is expensive compared to the features that they offer."
  • "The price is very expensive."
  • "The solution is moderately priced."
  • "The price of HCL AppScan is okay, in my opinion. You just buy HCL AppScan and don't pay anything anymore, meaning it is just a one-time purchase."
  • More HCL AppScan Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Klocwork is still tight on their licensing. If Klocwork would loosen up on the licensing, and where the license could be used, and how many different programs could be run on it, then we have several development programs that I would love to be able to use it for going forward."
  • "Klocwork should not to be quite so heavy handed on the licensing for very specific programs."
  • "The limitation that we have is that Klocwork is licensed to certain programs, and if you want to license them to other programs, you have to pay more money."
  • "When it comes to licensing, the solution has two packages, one for a fixed and the other for a floating server, with the former being more cost effective than the latter."
  • "Licensing fees are paid annually, but they also have a perpetual license."
  • "There are other solutions on the market such as Microsoft Visual Studio. They have been adding more static code analysis features that come for free. It is getting better all the time. That is one of the possibilities is that we've been considering that we may stop using the Klocwork because it doesn't give us any added value."
  • "The pricing for Klocwork is very competitive if you compare it from apple to apple. It has competitive pricing regarding the licensing model and the per-license cost. Klocwork isn't a high-end investment for anyone deploying it; even SMBs can afford it. The Klocwork cost per user would depend on the license type, so I'm unable to mention a ballpark figure because it would depend on the type of installation and how the deployment will be, and the nodes to give an accurate calculation or figure. The total price depends on the package, so my company could never publish pricing for Klocwork on the website. My team first collects information from potential clients on the deployment scenario, project environment, etc., before suggesting a package for Klocwork. My rating for Klocwork in terms of pricing is a five because of its flexible license models. There's a license model for every type of organization, whether small, midsize, or enterprise, so it's a five out of five for me."
  • "This solution offers competitive pricing."
  • More Klocwork Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as… more »
    Top Answer:Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%.
    Top Answer:The solution's price is high and you pay based on the number of users.
    Top Answer:The product has valuable features for static and dynamic testing.
    Top Answer:HCL AppScan generates false results. Sometimes, it incorrectly identifies requests as vulnerable when they are not… more »
    Top Answer:HCL AppScan efficiently scans through the website and identifies vulnerabilities for AWS. It is reducing tools day by… more »
    Top Answer:It's integrated into our CI, continuous integration.
    Top Answer:Our purchasing department is responsible for tracking costs. It's one of the most widely used tools in our organization… more »
    Top Answer:The main problem is that since it only parses the code, the warnings or the problems that are given as a result of the… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    34,421
    Comparisons
    22,385
    Reviews
    21
    Average Words per Review
    508
    Rating
    7.7
    Views
    5,423
    Comparisons
    4,191
    Reviews
    16
    Average Words per Review
    360
    Rating
    7.2
    Views
    3,452
    Comparisons
    2,086
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    850
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    SonarQube logo
    Compared 52% of the time.
    Veracode logo
    Compared 13% of the time.
    Fortify on Demand logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Snyk logo
    Compared 4% of the time.
    Acunetix logo
    Compared 1% of the time.
    SonarQube logo
    Compared 15% of the time.
    Veracode logo
    Compared 12% of the time.
    Acunetix logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    OWASP Zap logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    Fortify on Demand logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    SonarQube logo
    Compared 36% of the time.
    Coverity logo
    Compared 34% of the time.
    Polyspace Code Prover logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    CodeSonar logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    Veracode logo
    Compared 4% of the time.
    Also Known As
    IBM Security AppScan, Rational AppScan, AppScan
    Learn More
    Overview

    Checkmarx One is an enterprise cloud-native application security platform focused on providing cross-tool, correlated results to help AppSec and developer teams prioritize where to focus time and resources.

    Checkmarx One offers comprehensive application scanning across the SDLC:

    • Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
    • Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
    • API security
    • Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
    • Container security
    • IaC security
    • Correlation, prioritization, and risk management
    • Codebashing secure code training
    • AI security
    • Tech partnerships extending AppSec into runtime analysis
    • Developer tool integrations including: CI/CD tools, development frameworks, feedback tools, IDEs, programming languages and SCMs

    Checkmarx One provides everything you need to secure application development from the first line of code through deployment and runtime in the cloud. With an ever-evolving set of AppSec engines, correlation and prioritization features, and AI capabilities, Checkmarx One helps consolidate expanding lists of AppSec tools and make better sense of results. Its capabilities are designed to provide an improved developer experience to build trust with development teams and ensure the success of your AppSec program investment.

    IBM Security AppScan enhances web application security and mobile application security, improves application security program management and strengthens regulatory compliance. By scanning your web and mobile applications prior to deployment, AppScan enables you to identify security vulnerabilities and generate reports and fix recommendations.

    Klocwork detects security, safety, and reliability issues in real-time by using this static code analysis toolkit that works alongside developers, finding issues as early as possible, and integrates with teams, supporting continuous integration and actionable reporting.

    Sample Customers
    YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC
    Essex Technology Group Inc., Cisco, West Virginia University, APIS IT
    ACCESS Co Ltd, Risk-AI, Winbond Electronics, Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute, University of Southern California, Alebra Technologies, SIMULIA, Risk Management Solutions, Brigham Young University, SRD, HRL
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company31%
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Insurance Company5%
    REVIEWERS
    Government15%
    Transportation Company15%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Insurance Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Government9%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company50%
    Engineering Company10%
    Non Tech Company10%
    Transportation Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization39%
    Manufacturing Company19%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Financial Services Firm4%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise50%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise72%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise63%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise72%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business52%
    Midsize Enterprise5%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business8%
    Midsize Enterprise45%
    Large Enterprise46%
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Security Tools
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools. Updated: May 2024.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.