We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP and Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Container Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The visibility in our cloud environment is the most valuable feature."
"Assets Management as it provide complete visibility of our workload inkling EC2 instance or Serverless"
"Cloud security posture management is the feature we've been using the longest."
"The reporting is quite good. It is the most powerful aspect of this solution."
"We like the GSL Builder feature. When you're running a security operations center, you spend a lot of time monitoring endpoint activity to ensure there is no malicious traffic or anonymous access in the environment. The GSL Builder is helpful for deep investigations of a particular reason for an incident. You can use it to get more information."
"It offers security insights and recommendations to assist organizations in acting and remediating issues swiftly."
"The most valuable features of CloudGuard CNAPP are its compliance engine and auto-remediation features."
"The product allows us to enhance the security of the implementations we have."
"The product retains a lot of log data for subsequent analysis."
"It is a great resource for us because we have so many different data sources and to be able to aggregate that and put it through a concise dashboard or an alert really helps."
"The initial setup was straightforward. We didn't find it to be too complex."
"Great monitoring of network devices."
"Splunk has drawn our attention to how the network is running. If there are alarms on things that are not functioning, it gives us early warning on problems that could arise."
"The tool is efficient in collecting, monitoring and evaluating logs."
"The alerts are the most valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature is log reporting."
"Timely updates and upgrades to meet modern technological changes could help improve performance and limit the chances of downtime."
"No improvements are needed."
"The main issue that we found with Dome9 is that we have a default rule set with better recommendations that we want to use. So, you do a clone of that rule set, then you do some tweaks and customizations, but there is a problem. When they activate the default rule set with the recommendations and new security measures, it doesn't apply the new security measures to your clones profile. Therefore, you need to clone the profile again. We are already writing a report to Check Point."
"The software configurations theory is complicated, and without proper planning and a well-skilled technical team, it cannot perform its tasks properly."
"The accuracy of its remediation is a 7.5 out of 10. Before, I would have given it a ten but now, to handle remediation for fully qualified domain names, it's not working as it did in the past. We're finding some difficulties there."
"The biggest thing is the documentation aspect of Dome9 is a little lacking. They were purchased by Check Point about a year and a half to two years ago. When they integrated into Check Point's support system, a lot of the documentation that they had previously got mangled in the transition, e.g., linking to stuff on the Dome9 website that no longer exists. There are still a lot of spaces with incomplete links and stuff that is not as fully explained as it could be."
"The performance can be better. Sometimes, the performance is not up to the mark. There is also integration complexity with third-party software and tools."
"The reporting dashboard responds slowly, which leads to late report compilation."
"The solution's stability is an area that has room for improvement. It needs to provide constant stability to its users."
"It does not have a user-friendly interface and it is difficult to use."
"The clustering part of indexes can be more refined."
"The product collects a lot of data but it does not assure that it collects all of it."
"Splunk would be better if some tools were integrated to be able to take action on security or network concerns."
"I would like to see an improvement and some innovation in the customer interface."
"The end-to-end visibility is lacking because Splunk cannot directly monitor network devices."
"A lot of customers had a hard time effectively searching within the data in Splunk. There is a learning curve from searches to indexes and using all the macros that we have created. It is a little difficult for somebody who has not used it quite a bit and does not have a lot of practice with it, but the AI features that we have been hearing about through Splunk will make it a lot easier for us to use human language to search this data. That is big. That is pretty powerful, and that will help a lot with our customers."
More Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is ranked 6th in Container Management with 63 reviews while Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Container Management with 24 reviews. Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is rated 8.6, while Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP writes "Threat intel integration provides us visibility in case any workload is communicating with suspicious or blacklisted IPs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring writes "Helps to ingest a massive amount of raw data and use it effectively". Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, AWS GuardDuty, Wiz, Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Qualys VMDR, whereas Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring is most compared with ServiceNow IT Operations Management, Nagios XI, Amazon CloudWatch, Cisco Intersight and ITRS Geneos. See our Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs. Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring report.
See our list of best Container Management vendors.
We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
