We performed a comparison between CA Application Lifecycle Conductor [EOL] and IBM Engineering Workflow Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites.More IBM Engineering Workflow Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
CA Application Lifecycle Conductor [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites while IBM Engineering Workflow Management is ranked 10th in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools with 14 reviews. CA Application Lifecycle Conductor [EOL] is rated 0.0, while IBM Engineering Workflow Management is rated 6.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Engineering Workflow Management writes "Offers good traceability elements but UI needs improvement ". CA Application Lifecycle Conductor [EOL] is most compared with , whereas IBM Engineering Workflow Management is most compared with Jira, Codebeamer, Microsoft Azure DevOps, GitLab and Polarion ALM.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.