We performed a comparison between CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] and Wireshark based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about NetAlly, Auvik, Wireshark and others in Network Troubleshooting."The pricing is relatively low compared to other solutions in this area. I'd go so far as to say it's even significantly less than the competition."
"The most valuable feature is the fault management monitoring."
"It has a good syntax to put the commands in and get information out of."
"The product is simple to implement."
"If you're dealing with troubleshooting network, voice issues, or network operations, having a tool like Wireshark to dive into packet details is important. The initial setup is straightforward. Anyone starting out or looking to deploy it on your personal PC or machine can do it easily."
"The options that are required to get the details for the packet drops are good."
"The session-level filtering features are valuable."
"I like the filtering feature as we can filter data easily. This feature is also available in tcpdump, but it's a simple piece of software. Wireshark is more advanced and has many features. It allows you to filter a lot of things. The output can be filtered easily. The most important feature is colorization. If I say, "Okay, this particular SMB protocol in red, it will show me red." It's easy to identify that protocol or capture data."
"The GUI is easy to use."
"It is a stable product. I would rate the stability a ten out of ten."
"The user interface needs improvement."
"My biggest complaint about ADA is that you have to rely on dedicated appliances."
"It is not an easy program. You will need to study to use it to its full capabilities (follow a course)."
"Wireshark could be improved by adding more monitoring features."
"Wireshark could be improved with a delay option when getting data automatically."
"With Wireshark, you cannot download and utilize the packet in automation."
"There is a disadvantage when it comes to sampling intervals. Additionally, I've heard from a colleague that Wireshark might be less effective in the voice domain."
"I would like to see Wireshark improve the ease of application of the command. The command is very powerful, but not easy to apply."
"We'd like to be able to extract the output into an Excel table."
"It would be better if they offered a hybrid version like My Cloud Control."
More CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Network Troubleshooting while Wireshark is ranked 4th in Network Troubleshooting with 61 reviews. CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] is rated 6.6, while Wireshark is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] writes "Impressive ability to show potential slow downs. ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wireshark writes "User-friendly with an easy setup and a nice interface". CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Wireshark is most compared with Nagios XI, Zabbix, SolarWinds NPM, ClearSight Analyzer and Colasoft Capsa.
See our list of best Network Troubleshooting vendors.
We monitor all Network Troubleshooting reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
