We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere Integration and SAS Data Integration Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft, Microsoft, Oracle and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)."The most valuable feature of the solution is its monitoring part to debug certain issues and find problems."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"Low-code development is the most valuable feature."
"The product's integration features are quite rich and low code. It is easy to use."
"The iPaaS functionality is very mature. The browser based IDE is also very mature and stable."
"Extremely flexible for any kind of integration between systems."
"The tool's most valuable features I've found are related to debugging and testing. It makes it easy to track execution, documents, and process history. This functionality is particularly useful for identifying issues with data and providing insights to the business."
"The Salesforce and NetSuite Application specific “connectors” provide a layer of abstraction on top of the SOAP-based APIs to streamline integration development."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its amazing capabilities in regard to data handling."
"The solution offers very good data manipulation and loading."
"The solution is very stable."
"In my experience, I haven't encountered any major issues with the tool. However, there could be a learning curve for new users, especially depending on which tool you're using. For example, I've used MuleSoft in the past, which is more code-oriented and requires knowledge of Java. Transitioning to Boomi AtomSphere Integration took me a couple of months because of differences in terminology."
"They should create a custom connector option. With this, they could improve where the user can create the connector, based on their usage."
"They need to introduce more configurable functions to remove scripting or coding. Scripting should be minimized. It should have exhaustive functions. Currently, it lacks in this aspect."
"They are lacking in some streaming features, and messaging features from a listener's point of view."
"It is a costly platform. Its pricing could be better."
"It crashes if we run high-volume integration."
"Have to create some of our own pre-built connectors."
"There should be more scripting possibilities."
"The initial setup of SAS Data Integration Server was complex."
"So I would like to see improved integration with other software."
"The transform tool has limited access. They should make it more flexible."
Boomi AtomSphere Integration is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while SAS Data Integration Server is ranked 34th in Data Integration with 3 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere Integration is rated 7.8, while SAS Data Integration Server is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere Integration writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAS Data Integration Server writes "A stable and scalable tool with data handling capabilities and an amazing technical support". Boomi AtomSphere Integration is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, webMethods Integration Server, SSIS, Oracle Integration Cloud Service and Azure Data Factory, whereas SAS Data Integration Server is most compared with Palantir Foundry, SSIS, Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), AWS Glue and Azure Data Factory.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
