We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere Integration and Denodo based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."AtomSphere Integration will suit those looking for small automation and simple integrations."
"Extremely flexible for any kind of integration between systems."
"The iPaaS functionality is very mature. The browser based IDE is also very mature and stable."
"The product's integration features are quite rich and low code. It is easy to use."
"This solution has a user-friendly interface and very good documentation with solutions that helped us in working with the tool efficiently."
"It has been a stable product."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its monitoring part to debug certain issues and find problems."
"This is a fairly easy-to-use tool for integration which can be self-taught for those with a bit of a technical background."
"The most valuable features are data lineage and the concept of a semantic layer."
"Denodo is very stable."
"In PL/SQL, first you need to gather all the data and then start writing the file, but in Denodo you fetch the data and write the data simultaneously. So, for example, if you have 1 million or 2 million records, you don't have to wait to fetch all of the 2 million; you can keep on fetching and writing in the file simultaneously."
"This solution provides us with the ability to sync data, and make it available for anyone to use across the business."
"It is a go-to tool for data virtualization. The virtualization and data catalog are the features of why we chose Denodo."
"The ability to connect to a lot of different sources."
"While we may not be using all the features of Denodo at this time, we have found the data virtualization features to be very useful in helping us connect our data sources together, bringing all our data into one platform."
"Data mining is one of the valuable features. We're able to connect all of the data sources with the installed driver, so that is a good advantage in Denodo. Being able to join the tables and view them is also valuable."
"The solution is complex. There's a few items and features that are hard to understand. They should work to simplify the functionality so new users don't struggle."
"We encountered stability issues occasionally, one to two times a year."
"They need to introduce more configurable functions to remove scripting or coding. Scripting should be minimized. It should have exhaustive functions. Currently, it lacks in this aspect."
"The product's UI could be more convenient."
"The API can use some work to come up to speed with the competition but Dell has plans and is working on resolving that."
"There are still some areas that need improvement. For example, when updates are going on, the product becomes very slow."
"Documentation could be improved."
"The deployment was simple, but the implementation is missing a lot of capabilities."
"Tasks such as conversion of a date format or conversion of a number format that can be done in a very easy way in different languages, like SQL or Oracle, are not so easy to do in Denodo. For example, if you want to convert a date from one format to another, in Oracle it's pretty easy; in Denodo, however, it requires so many lines of code. Simple things that can be done very quickly in other database languages require more lines of code in Denodo."
"The git configuration really should be improved."
"I would like it if we could pull the data model or export the data model because Denodo has, based on how you build, something called associations. The data model gets very confusing when you go look at it. It depends on how you define it, but it's really huge. I wish there was a way to export it into Visio. It could be that they already have a way to do it, and I don't know, but it would be much easier for the architects and even for the developers to look at it than scrunching it into the screen and expanding every small portion of it. If there was an easy way to export the Denodo model into another modeling tool and view it, it would be great."
"We occasionally have some integration issues that we need to work through."
"The dropdown menus feel antiquated to me, and the administrative portals need improvement."
"Performance management could be improved."
"User-specific security at the column and row levels needs to be improved. Instead of applying security at every individual level, it would be better if it were at the group or tier level. It will save a lot of time."
"We would like this solution to be more universally user-friendly. At present it is really only aimed at IT specialists."
Boomi AtomSphere Integration is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while Denodo is ranked 1st in Data Virtualization with 29 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere Integration is rated 7.8, while Denodo is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere Integration writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Denodo writes "Saves our underwriters' time with data virtualization, but could provide more learning resources". Boomi AtomSphere Integration is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, webMethods Integration Server, SSIS, Oracle Integration Cloud Service and Azure Data Factory, whereas Denodo is most compared with Azure Data Factory, AWS Glue, Delphix, Mule Anypoint Platform and Informatica PowerCenter. See our Boomi AtomSphere Integration vs. Denodo report.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
