We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere Integration and Confluent based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft, Microsoft, Oracle and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)."The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"I have found the solution to be scalable."
"The platform is user-friendly."
"This solution has a user-friendly interface and very good documentation with solutions that helped us in working with the tool efficiently."
"I really appreciate the on-the-go access through the browser and the B2B integration."
"Very effective with its drag-and-drop feature."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its monitoring part to debug certain issues and find problems."
"I like the tool's optimization feature."
"A person with a good IT background and HTML will not have any trouble with Confluent."
"The solution can handle a high volume of data because it works and scales well."
"One of the best features of Confluent is that it's very easy to search and have a live status with Jira."
"The most valuable is its capability to enhance the documentation process, particularly when creating software documentation."
"The monitoring module is impressive."
"Their tech support is amazing; they are very good, both on and off-site."
"Kafka Connect framework is valuable for connecting to the various source systems where code doesn't need to be written."
"I would rate the scalability of the solution at eight out of ten. We have 20 people who use Confluent in our organization now, and we hope to increase usage in the future."
"There is no validation in the mapping profile custom scripting, such as IntelliSense or advanced error checking."
"There should be more scripting possibilities."
"We would like to see more involvement between Dell Boomi and the end-users to help improve the customer experience."
"The product's UI could be more convenient."
"They are lacking in some streaming features, and messaging features from a listener's point of view."
"Documentation could be improved."
"The high price of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The deployment was simple, but the implementation is missing a lot of capabilities."
"Confluent's price needs improvement."
"there is room for improvement in the visualization."
"It could have more themes. They should also have more reporting-oriented plugins as well. It would be great to have free custom reports that can be dispatched directly from Jira."
"They should remove Zookeeper because of security issues."
"Confluence could improve the server version of the solution. However, most companies are going to the cloud."
"The product should integrate tools for incorporating diagrams like Lucidchart. It also needs to improve its formatting features. We also faced issues while granting permissions."
"There is no local support team in Saudi Arabia."
"The pricing model should include the ability to pick features and be charged for them only."
Boomi AtomSphere Integration is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while Confluent is ranked 3rd in Streaming Analytics with 19 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere Integration is rated 7.8, while Confluent is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere Integration writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Confluent writes "Has good technical support services and a valuable feature for real-time data streaming ". Boomi AtomSphere Integration is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, webMethods Integration Server, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SSIS and Azure Data Factory, whereas Confluent is most compared with Amazon MSK, Amazon Kinesis, Databricks, AWS Glue and Oracle GoldenGate.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
