We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere Integration and CloverETL based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft, Microsoft, Oracle and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)."We work on the flow between systems and the most valuable features for that purpose are the mapping of data, interface mapping, and data integration."
"It's very user-friendly and designed to be easy to use for the end user."
"I really appreciate the on-the-go access through the browser and the B2B integration."
"The solution has a lot of connectors, which is quite helpful."
"I like the tool's optimization feature."
"The connection configuration part and the drag-and-drop integration module are the most valuable features for me."
"It has been a stable product."
"The product's integration features are quite rich and low code. It is easy to use."
"No dependence on native language and ease of use."
"Key features include wealth of pre-defined components; all components are customizable; descriptive logging, especially for error messages."
"Server features for scheduler: It is very easy to schedule jobs and monitor them. The interface is easy to use."
"Connectivity to various data sources: The ability to extract data from different data sources gives greater flexibility."
"It is a costly platform. Its pricing could be better."
"The deployment was simple, but the implementation is missing a lot of capabilities."
"There should be more scripting possibilities."
"There are more mature (dedicated) API management and master data management (MDM) solutions available in the market."
"The high price of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"In day-to-day operations, tracking transactions is a major challenge. It takes hours to track a single transaction. It is not a straightforward process."
"It crashes if we run high-volume integration."
"The solution is complex. There's a few items and features that are hard to understand. They should work to simplify the functionality so new users don't struggle."
"Its documentation could be improved."
"Needs: easier automated failure recovery; more, and more intuitive auto-generated/filled-in code for components; easier/more automated sync between CloverETL Designer and CloverETL Server."
"Resource management: We typically run out of heap space, and even the allocation of high heap space does not seem to be enough."
Earn 20 points
Boomi AtomSphere Integration is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while CloverETL is ranked 61st in Data Integration. Boomi AtomSphere Integration is rated 7.8, while CloverETL is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere Integration writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CloverETL writes "Provides wealth of pre-defined, customizable components, and descriptive logging for errors". Boomi AtomSphere Integration is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, webMethods Integration Server, SSIS, Oracle Integration Cloud Service and Azure Data Factory, whereas CloverETL is most compared with SSIS, Talend Open Studio and iWay Universal Adapter Framework.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
