Basis Testimony vs OpenText UFT Developer comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Basis Technologies Logo
341 views|195 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
OpenText Logo
3,210 views|1,945 comparisons
77% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Basis Testimony and OpenText UFT Developer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Regression Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Regression Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Eitan Gold
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It takes less time to complete the regression testing."

More Basis Testimony Pros →

"This tool is really good. We don't need to write any code, but it writes the code itself, only record and play. And it is simple, and it is not heavy; I mean, it doesn't have a large footprint, and it works well for us.""Integrates well with other products.""The cost is the most important factor in this tool.""The most valuable feature is the Object Model, where you can directly pull up the object as a global or a local.""There are many good things. Like it is intuitive and scripting was easy. Plus the availability of experienced resources in India due to its market leadership.""The recording feature is quite good as it helps us to find out how things are working.""The most valuable feature of the solution is the number of plugins for object recognition. The predefined libraries allow us to automate tasks.""One aspect that I like about Micro Focus UFT Developer is the ability to integrate it into a testing framework as a library."

More OpenText UFT Developer Pros →

Cons
"The GUI and design could be improved."

More Basis Testimony Cons →

"It would be improved by adding a drag-and-drop interface to help alleviate the coding.""Integration with other tools can become a costly exercise.""The tool could be a little easier.""In the next release, I would like to see the connectivity improved to be less complex and more stable.""The parallel execution of the tests needs improvement. When we are running tests in LeanFT, there are some limitations in terms of running the same tests simultaneously across different browsers. If I'm running a test, let's say to log in, I should be able to execute it through IE, through Microsoft Edge, through Chrome, through Mozilla, etc. This capability doesn't exist in LeanFT. Parallel execution of the test cases across different browsers need to be added.""We push one button and the tests are completely executed at once, so just have to analyze and say it's okay. It would be nice if this could be entirely automated.""The support from Micro Focus needs a lot of improvement.""The support for .NET Framework and Visual Studio in Micro Focus UFT Developer is currently limited. At present, only Visual Studio 2019 is supported, despite the release of a newer version (2022). Similarly, the tool only supports up to .NET Framework version 4.3.8, while there have been six newer versions released. This is an area that could be improved upon, particularly in the Windows environment."

More OpenText UFT Developer Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "It is quite expensive and is priced per seat or in concurrent (or floating) licenses over a period of months."
  • "The pricing is quite high compared to the competition."
  • "The cost of this solution is a little bit high and we are considering moving to another solution."
  • "When we compare in the market with other tools that have similar features, it may be a little bit extra, but the cost is ten times less."
  • "It is cheap, but if you take the enterprise license, it is valid for both software items."
  • "The licensing is very expensive, so often, we don't have enough VMs to run all of our tests."
  • "Its cost is a bit high. From the licensing perspective, I am using a concurrent license. It is not a seed license. It is something that I can use in our network. It can also be used by other users."
  • "The price of the solution could be lowered. The cost is approximately $25 per year for a subscription-based license."
  • More OpenText UFT Developer Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Regression Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:There are many good things. Like it is intuitive and scripting was easy. Plus the availability of experienced resources in India due to its market leadership.
    Top Answer:The pricing is competitive. It is affordable and average.
    Top Answer:Object definition and recognition need improvement, especially with calendar controls. I faced challenges with schedulers and calendars.
    Ranking
    17th
    Views
    341
    Comparisons
    195
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    16th
    Views
    3,210
    Comparisons
    1,945
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    452
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Micro Focus UFT Developer, UFT Pro (LeanFT), Micro Focus UFT Pro (LeanFT), LeanFT, HPE LeanFT
    Learn More
    Overview
    Information Not Available
    With OpenText UFT Developer, you get object identification tools, parallel testing, and record/replay capabilities.
    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Walmart, Hitachi, American Airlines, PepsiCo, AT&T, Ericsson, United Airlines
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company20%
    Insurance Company14%
    Energy/Utilities Company13%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Comms Service Provider12%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Energy/Utilities Company7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise4%
    Large Enterprise82%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business5%
    Midsize Enterprise24%
    Large Enterprise71%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise76%
    Buyer's Guide
    Regression Testing Tools
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Regression Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Basis Testimony is ranked 17th in Regression Testing Tools while OpenText UFT Developer is ranked 16th in Functional Testing Tools with 34 reviews. Basis Testimony is rated 8.0, while OpenText UFT Developer is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Basis Testimony writes "User-friendly regression testing that is fast and offers good support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText UFT Developer writes "Integrates well, has LeanFT library, and good object detection ". Basis Testimony is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, whereas OpenText UFT Developer is most compared with OpenText UFT One, Tricentis Tosca, OpenText Silk Test, froglogic Squish and Original Software TestDrive.

    See our list of best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Regression Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.