We performed a comparison between Barracuda Web Application Firewall and Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."The solution has been quite stable. It's reliable."
"We only need one subscription to be protected against both active DDoS and offline DDoS attacks."
"The most valuable feature is the rule set."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the simplicity of configuration."
"One of the strongest points is its robust issue discovery capabilities. Barracuda invests significant efforts in identifying and resolving issues. They have multiple products that work in tandem to perform these checks, which is beneficial because it automates security updates. This is the primary reason I recommend it to my customers."
"The product has fantastic support services."
"It significantly improved our overall web security posture, addressing intrusions and enhancing control over web URLs in our environment."
"The most valuable features are the client VPN and content filtering."
"The most valuable aspect of this solution is that it is simple to deploy. The deployment took us ten minutes."
"The usability of the interface could be improved."
"The policy updates could be improved."
"There are some vulnerabilities that are reported across the tools offered by Barracuda for some devices, which need to be taken care of from an improvement perspective."
"As most people are aware, the implementation is not easy."
"Barracuda Web Application Firewall’s scalability needs improvement."
"I would like to see an improved capacity to store logs so that they will be available for a longer time."
"I would suggest that someone implementing this product is knowledgeable in the IT field, and with the network needs. It is complex."
"The reporting aspect of the solution needs improvement. I don't find that it's very good. They could do some work on it to make it much better. It's not that the reporting isn't secure. It's just that I would prefer to store my reports for an extended period of time. Right now, that's not possible and I'd prefer it if that could change. I also would say that the reports themselves are expensive."
"In terms of what needs improvement, the price could be lowered. We've tried to deploy more of them but our purchasing department has said that they're way too expensive and they would prefer to use something else."
More Barracuda Web Application Firewall Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Barracuda Web Application Firewall is ranked 14th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 38 reviews while Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall is ranked 40th in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Barracuda Web Application Firewall is rated 8.2, while Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Barracuda Web Application Firewall writes "Provides strong issue discovery capabilities; enhance the security parameters of web applications and suitable for medium to large enterprises". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall writes "Good feature set and is simple to deploy ". Barracuda Web Application Firewall is most compared with Fortinet FortiWeb, F5 Advanced WAF, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, HAProxy and Kemp LoadMaster, whereas Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall is most compared with F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), NGINX Plus, Citrix NetScaler, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway and HAProxy.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.