Bacula Enterprise vs Cohesity Imanis Data comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Bacula Systems Logo
1,378 views|1,030 comparisons
90% willing to recommend
Cohesity Logo
143 views|75 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Bacula Enterprise and Cohesity Imanis Data based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Backup and Recovery solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Bacula Enterprise vs. Cohesity Imanis Data Report (Updated: May 2024).
769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It brought many advantages - such as the learning curve being very light.""Bacula is pretty stable.""It is easy to scale Bacula Enterprise even if your system is growing tremendously in data and servers.""The most valuable features are the special plugins such as SAP HANA databases, Microsoft SQL, and various types of virtualization.""The solution has extensive documentation and a very active community.""It works great and it provides you with several standard tools to restore your backup, even after a big failure.""It can be used in virtually any environment we have onsite."

More Bacula Enterprise Pros →

"It's very regimented and fast. It does local backup, cloud backup, long-term coverage, and disaster recovery.""Its big data and archive data features are the features that I have found most valuable. I can use it in a big virtual environment."

More Cohesity Imanis Data Pros →

Cons
"We would like to see an improvement in the functionality of the GUI.""The initial setup could be a bit easier.""Easier setup and configuration, perhaps including a GUI, would be an improvement.""Bacula needs a graphical user interface because, for administrators, the command-line interface is okay, but for the average user it is not very easy.""A more user-friendly interface (GUI) can be developed.""We are looking for a unique interface that can rule both enterprise and open source editions. Such a thing does not yet exist.""It could improve its interface or offer a specific screen for the manager of the company."

More Bacula Enterprise Cons →

"The initial setup can be complex, depending on the environment.""The limitation that I see in Cohesity is that the minimum sized node is 36 terabytes, which is more than a small customer needs."

More Cohesity Imanis Data Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "This is an open-source solution."
  • "We have a perpetual license."
  • More Bacula Enterprise Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It's priced properly for the market."
  • More Cohesity Imanis Data Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.
    769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It brought many advantages - such as the learning curve being very light.
    Top Answer:It could improve its interface or offer a specific screen for the manager of the company. A managerial user who wants more information beyond the operational technician should be able to access it. It… more »
    Top Answer:We use the solution as a complete backup solution for virtual machines and databases in Prodap - Data Processing in Amapá. Its very lean and simple architecture, with its deduplications not covering… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    30th
    out of 133 in Backup and Recovery
    Views
    1,378
    Comparisons
    1,030
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    420
    Rating
    9.0
    88th
    out of 133 in Backup and Recovery
    Views
    143
    Comparisons
    75
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Bacula Enterprise is a highly scalable, especially robust and secure data backup and recovery software. Its unique low cost subscription model empowers data centers to truly escape data volume price traps. With a high degree of flexibility and customizability, Bacula offers native integration with a wide range of hypervisors, databases, file systems, cloud interfaces and containers. High numbers of enterprise organizations worldwide (incl. NASA, Bank of Austria, Swisscom or Sky PLC) have adopted Bacula Enterprise backup software in mission critical environments because of its advanced features and ability to handle high data volume at very low cost.

    Radically simple backup, recovery, and data management for Hadoop Distributed File System and NoSQL distributed databases including MongoDB, Cassandra, CouchbaseDB, Hbase, and others.

    Sample Customers
    NASA, SwissCom, Navisite, Turner Studios, Bank Austria, Caixa Bank, SdV Plurimedia, Leibniz University Hannover, Zeta Global, Tricore, NetLog, Siemens, LocaWeb, wbsGo, itesys, Queens School of Computing, Escrypt.
    MDL AutoMation
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    University10%
    Government9%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business56%
    Large Enterprise44%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise53%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Bacula Enterprise vs. Cohesity Imanis Data
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Bacula Enterprise vs. Cohesity Imanis Data and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Bacula Enterprise is ranked 30th in Backup and Recovery with 9 reviews while Cohesity Imanis Data is ranked 88th in Backup and Recovery. Bacula Enterprise is rated 8.6, while Cohesity Imanis Data is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Bacula Enterprise writes "Very cost-effective and well organized with good compression". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cohesity Imanis Data writes "Has good big data and archive features ". Bacula Enterprise is most compared with Bareos, Veeam Backup & Replication, UrBackup, Veritas NetBackup and Acronis Cyber Protect, whereas Cohesity Imanis Data is most compared with . See our Bacula Enterprise vs. Cohesity Imanis Data report.

    See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

    We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.