We performed a comparison between AWS Glue and Informatica Data Integration Hub based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), MuleSoft, Matillion and others in Cloud Data Integration."I like the fact that AWS Glue works with Python scripts."
"I like its integration and ability to handle all data-related tasks."
"AWS Glue is fast and managed by AWS. Hence, you don't have to worry about capacity and the performance of Glue jobs. It has integrations with other data stores of AWS. The product offers metadata management, logging, and ETL processing capabilities. It comes with a powerful feature, Glue Studio, which helps to do queries interactively within the community. It is a managed service and very secure. Another popular and mature service is S3."
"Glue is a NoSQL-based data ETL tool that has some advantages over IIS and ISAs."
"The solution is highly user-friendly, and its features are easy to use. The new addition of AWS Glue Data Catalog is also very beneficial, making the tool even more helpful for its users."
"Transformations are valuable because you can modify or override complex data logic from an open source or Spark to solve issues."
"The solution helps organizations gain flexibility in defining the structure of the data."
"The facility to integrate with S3 and the possibility to use Jupyter Notebook inside the pipeline are the most valuable features."
"The technical support services are good."
"The MDM solution is capable of integrating multiple systems, so it helped us to solve the purpose of centralizing the depository as well as the standardization of mass data. It takes away all the ambiguity around data integrity issues or all the process challenges which happen when every stage of a process uses a different source as master data."
"Performance and flexibility-wise, they're very user-friendly."
"AWS Glue is more costly compared to other tools like Airflow."
"The crucial problem with AWS Glue is that it only works with AWS. It is not an agnostic tool like Pentaho. In PowerCenter, we can install the forms from Google and other vendors, but in the case of AWS Glue, we can only use AWS."
"The product has only a few built-in transformations."
"The price of the solution could improve."
"One area that could be improved is the ETL view. The drag-and-drop interface is not as user-friendly as some other ETL tools."
"Overall, I consider the technical support to be fine, although the response time could be faster in certain cases."
"I haven't looked into Glue in terms of seeking out flaws. I've not come across missing features."
"The solution’s stability could be improved."
"When it comes to UI look and feel and user experience, Informatica is not as good as other solutions."
"The initial setup was not very straightforward. Not complex, but not very simple either."
"They could provide more robust performance for data integration processes. It would help in improving the data quality more efficiently."
More Informatica Data Integration Hub Pricing and Cost Advice →
AWS Glue is ranked 1st in Cloud Data Integration with 37 reviews while Informatica Data Integration Hub is ranked 37th in Data Integration with 3 reviews. AWS Glue is rated 7.8, while Informatica Data Integration Hub is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AWS Glue writes "Provides serverless mechanism, easy data transformation and automated infrastructure management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Informatica Data Integration Hub writes "Excellent at standardizing mass data and capable of integrating with multiple solutions ". AWS Glue is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Informatica PowerCenter, SSIS, Informatica Cloud Data Integration and Talend Open Studio, whereas Informatica Data Integration Hub is most compared with Informatica PowerCenter, AWS Database Migration Service, Azure Data Factory, SAP Data Hub and Mule Anypoint Platform.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.