We performed a comparison between Automic Automation Intelligence and UiPath Orchestrator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Workload Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of Automic Automation Intelligence is the ability to see all of the batches from one place. Additionally, there is a multiple scheduler that is useful."
"The Action Packs are a good feature."
"The tool's online manuals and documentation are good. Its user interface is user-friendly."
"It allows for the segregation of users, ensuring each user has access to specific environments based on their roles."
"The product has been pretty amazing at deploying, scheduling, and running automated bots."
"The centralized dashboard and asset management in UiPath Orchestrator have proven valuable in enhancing operational efficiency."
"The product helps to monitor our automation process and keep statistics. When not dealing with just one process, we utilize the business process. From there, we obtain the necessary answers, and the robot completes the process accordingly. We keep on improving our processes to become more effective. Hence, we start with a small process."
"The platform serves as a valuable tool for orchestrating solutions within an organization."
"One standout feature I like in UiPath Orchestrator is the scheduling capability."
"From what I have seen, it is a reliable tool."
"The logs are the best feature of the solution."
"The job reporting feature needs improvement."
"Integration of the solution could be improved."
"The solution could benefit by having more connectors and customized widgets. Additionally, a dashboard that people could use for videos would be helpful."
"The vision libraries that the tool provides, along with the visualization part, are areas with shortcomings in the solution where improvements are required."
"The solution's pricing can be more competitive. Apache is one of the most expensive alternatives in the market. The integration with reporting tools and classic solutions is essential. Having BI integration, Salesforce integration, and robust monitoring and reporting capabilities would enhance the product."
"The tool makes the laptops slow."
"Limiting certain deployment scenarios and enforcing best practices could be beneficial."
"I had faced issues with passwords and the monitoring feature."
"The code management for the Studio could be improved."
"One of the significant challenges we've encountered with UiPath Orchestrator is the frequent and rapid changes in the tool's interface and functionality."
"The product must conduct more promotional activities and webinars."
More Automic Automation Intelligence Pricing and Cost Advice →
Automic Automation Intelligence is ranked 19th in Workload Automation with 3 reviews while UiPath Orchestrator is ranked 11th in Workload Automation with 21 reviews. Automic Automation Intelligence is rated 8.6, while UiPath Orchestrator is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Automic Automation Intelligence writes "Useful multiple scheduler, centralized batch view, and reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UiPath Orchestrator writes "A user-friendly and reliable tool that is easy to implement". Automic Automation Intelligence is most compared with Redwood RunMyJobs, AppWorx Workload Automation, AutoSys Workload Automation, Automic Workload Automation and Control-M, whereas UiPath Orchestrator is most compared with Control-M. See our Automic Automation Intelligence vs. UiPath Orchestrator report.
See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
