We performed a comparison between Automic Automation Intelligence and Automic Workload Automation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Workload Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The tool's online manuals and documentation are good. Its user interface is user-friendly."
"The Action Packs are a good feature."
"The most valuable feature of Automic Automation Intelligence is the ability to see all of the batches from one place. Additionally, there is a multiple scheduler that is useful."
"The most valuable features are the predefined templates for application-specific jobs and the access for different users."
"It helps our efficiency because it is a batch processing tool which works without a menu."
"It has its own object-oriented scripting language and you can reload your object in many different places."
"Compared to other products, the stability is remarkable."
"It works to automate business processes over all the systems. You have a central point where you can automate everything."
"The scalability is great."
"It is easy to set up and use. The whole system is complete."
"We automate very manual, robust tasks, which are very time consuming and not error-free."
"Integration of the solution could be improved."
"The solution could benefit by having more connectors and customized widgets. Additionally, a dashboard that people could use for videos would be helpful."
"The job reporting feature needs improvement."
"The user interface could be a little more user-friendly, as it is not the best out there."
"The vendor support is really bad and should be improved."
"The interface could be made more user-friendly in terms of job creation and scheduling, especially when doing bulk job creation."
"They should work to reduce pricing."
"An area for improvement would be SQL performance. While tracing SQL traffic, we noticed a lot of commands that cause contention/locks as well as forced waits. The efficiency of the SQL could be greatly improved (in some cases by simply replacing nested Selects and using NOLOCK hints)."
"We would like to have token-based authentication. Where we do not have to use a password, and can use tokens for authentication in other systems."
"With every new version, things that would previously work, Automic breaks them. So, we have to report the new bugs. Therefore, every time when we patch the system, there is usually a new bug or a feature that was working, then it stops working."
"I would like to see features from "Prompt" sets in read Masks."
More Automic Automation Intelligence Pricing and Cost Advice →
Automic Automation Intelligence is ranked 20th in Workload Automation with 3 reviews while Automic Workload Automation is ranked 7th in Workload Automation with 85 reviews. Automic Automation Intelligence is rated 8.6, while Automic Workload Automation is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Automic Automation Intelligence writes "Useful multiple scheduler, centralized batch view, and reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Automic Workload Automation writes "A tool requiring an easy setup phase that provides its users with flexibility and flow chart visibility ". Automic Automation Intelligence is most compared with Redwood RunMyJobs, AutoSys Workload Automation, AppWorx Workload Automation, Fortra's Automate and Control-M, whereas Automic Workload Automation is most compared with Control-M, AutoSys Workload Automation, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Dollar Universe Workload Automation and Redwood RunMyJobs. See our Automic Automation Intelligence vs. Automic Workload Automation report.
See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
