We performed a comparison between ArcSight Logger and Quest InTrust based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Datadog, Wazuh and others in Log Management."The most valuable feature is the search capability, which is simple to use."
"Our return on investment for implementing ArcSight Logger over the past 12 months has been positive."
"Some of the most valuable features I really appreciate are the performance, how quick the solution is, and how easy it is to create a query."
"It's a brilliant log collection tool, and it can handle hundreds of thousands of servers in a single shot to ingest the data."
"The ESM use cases are the most valuable. It enables us to use the big data collection inside our company. We are able to create use cases for whatever it suits and I find that the most interesting part of any SIEM solution."
"We check a lot of logs in ArcSight Logger because we're running a massive database platform."
"ArcSight provides the basic information that we want."
"ArcSight's robustness is its most valuable feature."
"I would rate the technical support very well as they are knowledgeable and quick to respond."
"I would rate the technical support only 5 out of 10. The technical support is not satisfactory."
"I had some latency issues for two months. I had to increase our storage capacity significantly to reduce the latency."
"The solution must provide readymade connectors for different applications."
"The console in older versions is not user-friendly."
"Using the ArcSight Logger dashboard is not particularly intuitive or efficient, so it is important to be trained in its use."
"I think the ArcSight team should try to simplify legacy products for the customers, because that product is not easy to use or to work with. It needs more more competency or appeal to use. We hope Micro Focus is trying to resolve this."
"It is really difficult to work in ArcSight Logger, as it is very slow."
"In the next release, I want to see more intelligence."
"It needs to have better reporting. "
"It was very complex. There was poor native correlation. "
Earn 20 points
ArcSight Logger is ranked 29th in Log Management with 30 reviews while Quest InTrust is ranked 54th in Log Management. ArcSight Logger is rated 7.8, while Quest InTrust is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of ArcSight Logger writes "A scalable and stable solution that enables users to see all the event logs in one place". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Quest InTrust writes "Technical support is knowledgeable and quick to respond". ArcSight Logger is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, IBM Security QRadar, Elastic Security, Wazuh and LogRhythm SIEM, whereas Quest InTrust is most compared with Change Auditor for Windows File Servers and syslog-ng.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
