We performed a comparison between AppDynamics Application Analytics, INETCO Insight, and Splunk Enterprise Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, New Relic, Devo and others in IT Operations Analytics."All the metrics are baselines in networks, infrastructure, application, and user experience. AppDynamics offers its own query language. It is called ADQL. You can write code of any kind to do queries and analysis and you can use those within the reporting or within other research."
"Immediately allows you to see the relationships between the different nodes."
"Provides good overall application performance and transaction errors."
"Application Analytics' most valuable features are the real-user monitoring and the agents installed in the software stack on the application server."
"The analytics are great."
"It's pretty stable."
"We had no issues with scalability. It was very good for us."
"This can help customers who already have a lot of monitoring providers consolidate what they have."
"It provides real-time information alerts."
"We can have a real-time detection for the root cause of problems, minimizing time to resolution."
"It's the completeness of the solution that we like the most."
"We have found all the features useful. However, the dashboarding and logging have been very helpful. Additionally, the log analysis does a great job."
"We can quickly search for almost anything across many log sources in seconds."
"The most valuable feature is the DSS, also known as SPL, because it allows users to script advanced queries with limited knowledge."
"Splunk's strongest suit is its user interface. We can integrate multiple solutions and adjust settings in the Splunk interface."
"Splunk is quite flexible for our customers. Splunk does not filter from a specific lock, you can define it later."
"It is very stable. We have not had any problems."
"It allows us to digest the information, the data, the different data streams, so we can make decisions based upon information that we receive, and it is pretty robust."
"The initial setup is a bit complex."
"Application Analytics' performance in pure and native cloud environments could be improved."
"The challenge in the installation is that you have to configure a lot of things manually. The way you install and configure it is not straightforward."
"Customization requires a few manual tweaks."
"The user experience is quite confusing. There are too many different development stages. The UI is not very intuitive."
"This feature needs to be properly described to a client, and then the client needs to have a use case. There are some clients which do not need it and some clients who do. It is not for everyone and is dependant on their use case."
"This is an expensive solution."
"It would help to have historical information."
"The product must improve insider threat detection."
"Make it easy to use and the cost cheaper. This will help all organisations to implement Splunk."
"There are a lot of competitive products that are doing better than what Splunk is doing on the analytics side."
"Could be more user friendly."
"Endpoint access is the only issue I can think to mention, even though the endpoint access we have with Cisco is fine."
"Adding custom visualization in Splunk has been improved over the years but can still be made better by integrating more and more JavaScript visualization sources."
"The level of scalability depends on the license you have. You can expand or reduce it based on the environment. It does cost more money to scale, however."
"The user access control could be much more granular, so that the admins can control r/w/x access for specific features of the product like dashboards, etc."
More AppDynamics Application Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
