We performed a comparison between Apache JMeter and Qualitia Automation Studio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, OpenText, Tricentis and others in Performance Testing Tools."Apache JMeter is quite flexible."
"It's stable and reliable."
"The distributed load testing is very good with Apache JMeter."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is being able to launch many requests and scheduling simulating human interactions with the application."
"The most valuable features are the integration with Jenkins and the reporting."
"The most valuable feature in JMeter is the Thread Group, which helps us to see whether the performance is good."
"The scripting ability is most valuable. It is easy to use. There is a UI, and you can go in there and figure those things out. After you've got a good set of tests, you basically have a scripted document that you can grab and execute in a pipeline. It is pretty quick to set up, and you can scale it and version control it."
"The recording and playback functionality is helpful."
"The best feature of this solution is the fact that it offers scriptless automation. You don't need to know how to code or program to use it."
"JMeter output reports can be difficult to understand without training."
"In Micro Focus LoadRunner we can go from the UI and we can configure it. There is no such feature in Apache JMeter. There should be UI-based recording history or logs."
"Because so much is being done these days with authentication processes, a better system for either getting bearer tokens or some kind of token-based authentication prior to executing APIs would benefit the product. It is there, and you can do things. It is just not real clean at this point. There should be a better authentication process for JMeter or some automation or better guidelines for gaining and utilizing tokens on the fly."
"Report generation needs to be improved. It is quite difficult to get to."
"The interface could be made more user-friendly."
"Improving JMeter's sync time would be beneficial."
"The only thing is the learning curve. It's high."
"Self-healing and page rendering for the end-users are not available in Apache JMeter."
"The integrations for this solutions could be improved, specifically for Slack."
Apache JMeter is ranked 1st in Performance Testing Tools with 82 reviews while Qualitia Automation Studio is ranked 23rd in Test Automation Tools with 5 reviews. Apache JMeter is rated 7.8, while Qualitia Automation Studio is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Apache JMeter writes "It's a free tool with a vast knowledge base, but the reporting is lackluster, and it has a steep learning curve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qualitia Automation Studio writes "Good Tool for Non Technical Users". Apache JMeter is most compared with BlazeMeter, Postman, Tricentis NeoLoad, Katalon Studio and OpenText LoadRunner Professional, whereas Qualitia Automation Studio is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, OpenText UFT One and Selenium HQ.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.