We performed a comparison between Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] and Mule ESB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration."There were no concerns with the stability. This product is very good from a stability perspective."
"The solution doesn't require much code writing and we can develop APIs very easily."
"The most powerful feature is DataWeave, which is a powerful language where data can be transformed from one form into another."
"I'm not using ESB directly. It is the integration layer, so it's running under the hood. However, the conversion and transformation performance is excellent. Anypoint Enterprise Security is also solid."
"The most valuable features of Mule ESB are its ease of use, documentation, ease to adapt to newer security and vulnerabilities, and a lot of help available. Additionally, there is a lot of flexibility, many patches available, and they provide APIs. They are a market standard."
"The most valuable feature for Mule is the number of connectors that are available."
"I like that Mule ESB provides fast and good technical support."
"Everything runs in Java, which is a useful feature."
"The most valuable feature of Mule ESB is data transformation, i.e. our interacting with different systems and orchestrating for our business needs."
"I am not sure if there are various connectors available in the recent version of Pervasive DI to support the wide range of sources available (e.g., big data, cloud, EME)."
"It would be much more beneficial if the solution included AI and business process management."
"The initial setup could be more straightforward."
"It would be great to see implementing security modules as a feature."
"The Anypoint platform consumes a lot of memory, and it would be great for developers if it were more lightweight."
"Lacking some connectors that could be included."
"The stability could be improved."
"Mule ESB could be more user-friendly. I think users must learn about the architecture before they start coding. The price could be better. In the next release, I would like to see an EDIFACT integration."
"In order to meet the new trend of active metadata management, we need intelligent APIs that can retrieve new data designs and trigger actions over new findings without human intervention."
Earn 20 points
Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Data Integration while Mule ESB is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 45 reviews. Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] is rated 5.8, while Mule ESB is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] writes "You can use it to send data back and forth between Salesforce.com and JD Edwards". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule ESB writes "Plenty of documentation, flexible, and reliable". Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Mule ESB is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, Oracle Service Bus, Oracle SOA Suite, webMethods Integration Server and Red Hat Fuse.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
