Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
AndreiBo - PeerSpot reviewer
Security Solution Architect at TD SYNNEX
Reseller
Top 5
Sep 25, 2024
Provides valuable sandboxing features and has a straightforward setup process
Pros and Cons
  • "The technical support team is knowledgeable and responsive."
  • "The solution's future releases would benefit from incorporating more advanced machine learning capabilities for real-time threat detection and enhanced user interface options for ease of use."

What is our primary use case?

We use the solution to secure cloud infrastructures and manage incoming and outgoing traffic. Our clients operating in hybrid environments must ensure robust security for their applications and data.

How has it helped my organization?

The platform has significantly improved our organization's security posture by providing comprehensive threat detection and response capabilities, enhancing the overall security of our cloud applications and data.

What is most valuable?

The solution's most valuable features include sandboxing, application control, and the remote access blade. Sandboxing is essential for isolating potentially malicious files, while application control allows us to manage user access effectively.

What needs improvement?

The solution's future releases would benefit from incorporating more advanced machine learning capabilities for real-time threat detection and enhanced user interface options for ease of use.

Buyer's Guide
Check Point CloudGuard Network Security
March 2026
Learn what your peers think about Check Point CloudGuard Network Security. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2026.
884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Check Point CloudGuard Network Security for six years.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The product is highly scalable and easily adapts to the growing needs of our clients' cloud environments.

How are customer service and support?

The technical support team is knowledgeable and responsive. 

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was relatively straightforward, requiring careful configuration to align with our security policies.

What about the implementation team?

We implemented the product through our in-house team, which was well-trained in the solution's features.

What was our ROI?

The return on investment has been substantial, as the enhanced security features have prevented potential breaches, saving costs related to security incidents.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I evaluated other options, including Palo Alto, but ultimately chose Check Point for its robust security features and user-friendly interface.

What other advice do I have?

I highly recommend CloudGuard for organizations looking to enhance cloud security due to its comprehensive features and strong track record.

I rate it a ten out of ten. 

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. reseller
PeerSpot user
IdoSarusi - PeerSpot reviewer
Developer at Shavit-security
Reseller
Top 5Leaderboard
Jul 8, 2024
Provides reasonable security for network at a reasonable price
Pros and Cons
  • "The router's anti-bot feature and network security for detecting malware and preventing its spread are critical components. Additionally, there are other features like antivirus, anti-malware, and a firewall. T"
  • "Every good security product requires a company with many research departments and staff."

What is our primary use case?

When we build security for companies, we use the cloud of services for building and configuring networks and Security on the company Network, including EDR or XDR on the computers, routers, and switches.

How has it helped my organization?

The customer gets reasonable security for their network at a reasonable price, except for Check Point's expensive router. Overall, the product is reasonably priced.

What is most valuable?

The router's anti-bot feature and network security for detecting malware and preventing its spread are critical components. Additionally, there are other features like antivirus, anti-malware, and a firewall. The anti-bot feature can detect if one device is hacked and has malware. It monitors the communication to and from this device and can detect and block the malware when it spreads to other computers on the network.

What needs improvement?

Every good security product requires a company with many research departments and staff. This ensures that the product is always up to date on the most relevant security threats. An excellent expert team of researchers on vulnerabilities and new cyber threats could exist.

They should start integrating AI more into the product to make it easier to use

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Check Point CloudGuard Network Security for one year and a half.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The product is stable if deployed correctly. I rate the solution’s stability a nine out of ten.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I rate the solution’s scalability a nine out of ten.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was neither easy nor difficult.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The product is expensive.

What other advice do I have?

Check Point is a reliable company for network security. I trust them to protect my resources when using their products. However, their solutions could be improved to be more user-friendly and easier to integrate.

I recently implemented Check Point CloudGuard Network Security for our company's new customers. I installed the features and products after consulting with them. Setting up the network configuration was moderately complex and required careful attention. Check Point offers extensive configuration options, providing enhanced control and security, although it may require more setup effort initially.

I advised others to configure their product correctly.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Private Cloud
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Check Point CloudGuard Network Security
March 2026
Learn what your peers think about Check Point CloudGuard Network Security. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2026.
884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ajdin Heric - PeerSpot reviewer
Lead Security Analyst at BH Telecom
Real User
Mar 5, 2024
Comes with threat prevention, HTTPS inspection, and the Anti-Bot blade features
Pros and Cons
  • "The tool's most valuable features for us are threat prevention, HTTPS inspection, and the Anti-Bot blade. Threat prevention helps to protect our assets from threats. HTTPS inspection ensures secure communication, and the Anti-Bot blade is particularly helpful in detecting C2 servers, enhancing our ability to identify malicious activities and protect our network."
  • "CloudGuard Network Security needs to include new features. One specific feature I would like to see is the ability to protect external resources using single sign-on integration with various identity providers, including custom identity providers. Its pricing could also be cheaper."

What is our primary use case?

The solution helps to protect our customers at the perimeter. We have integrated the solution into our NSX environment. 

What is most valuable?

The tool's most valuable features for us are threat prevention, HTTPS inspection, and the Anti-Bot blade. Threat prevention helps to protect our assets from threats. HTTPS inspection ensures secure communication, and the Anti-Bot blade is particularly helpful in detecting C2 servers, enhancing our ability to identify malicious activities and protect our network.

We can confidently assert that we are among the top cloud providers, protecting our customers from external threats. With Check Point's CloudGuard Network Security, we offer attack services protection. 

What needs improvement?

CloudGuard Network Security needs to include new features. One specific feature I would like to see is the ability to protect external resources using single sign-on integration with various identity providers, including custom identity providers. Its pricing could also be cheaper. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using the product for six years. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

CloudGuard Network Security is stable. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

CloudGuard Network Security is highly scalable in our virtual environment. We can easily add more ports, and it functions perfectly. We use it in cluster mode, deploying multiple Check Point clusters horizontally and vertically, making scalability easy and excellent.

How are customer service and support?

I find Check Point's technical support to be excellent. We have premium support, and whenever we open a case, especially for high-severity issues, we receive a phone call from their support team.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

How was the initial setup?

CloudGuard Network Security's deployment is straightforward. 

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The product is expensive but also valuable. 

What other advice do I have?

CloudGuard Network Security provides unified security management across hybrid clouds as well as on-premises environments. It helps to manage everything from a single point. 

I have been exploring Harmony SASE for remote security and zero-trust access in some proof-of-concept activities. Also, I'm checking out the CloudGuard Web Application Firewall for safeguarding our applications on the internet.

I rate the product a ten out of ten. We have had a great experience with Check Point, and we haven't faced any major incidents or attacks compromising our organization. It has helped us detect activities on our endpoints. 

I would genuinely recommend it. Check Point is easy to manage, implement, and configure. The support is excellent, and the constant threat intelligence updates ensure protection against various threats. It's truly an amazing product for securing your environment.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
reviewer2350719 - PeerSpot reviewer
System Engineer at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Mar 5, 2024
Helps to manage cloud traffic locally without routing it through data centers
Pros and Cons
  • "I like the tool's ability to manage cloud traffic locally without routing it through our data centers."
  • "The product needs to improve technical support."

What is most valuable?

I like the tool's ability to manage cloud traffic locally without routing it through our data centers.

What needs improvement?

The product needs to improve technical support.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using the product for four years. 

How are customer service and support?

The tool's support has been excellent. We can maintain our Check Point Firewalls effectively, both on-premises and in the cloud.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The tool's monthly costs have undergone a significant reduction, dropping from approximately 12,000 euros to around 4,000. This represents a cost reduction of over 60 percent. However, it's essential to note that while costs decreased in some areas, they increased in others due to shifts in our environment. As our overall environment has grown, currently connecting 50 accounts to the cloud, it's challenging to directly compare costs with the state of our setup three years ago.

What other advice do I have?

Initially, we faced some challenges, especially with the AWS transit gateway, involving manual routing configurations and complex setup tasks. I rate the overall product a nine out of ten. 

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
reviewer2350638 - PeerSpot reviewer
Platform Lead at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
Mar 4, 2024
Dynamic and scalable but improvement is needed in integration feature
Pros and Cons
  • "The Identity Awareness blade and dynamic tagging in Azure are valuable because they make access management automatic. Instead of manually setting up access for each new resource, it happens automatically based on the same access policy. This dynamic setup is scalable."
  • "Regarding CloudGuard Network Security's integration with various resources like application gateways and application-based security groups, there's room for exploring dynamic access in those areas. A significant concern is the upgrade process. Unlike an in-place upgrade, upgrading the tool in Azure requires deploying a new resource, which can be hectic and less reliable. We have to spend something new to have the tool's latest version."

What is our primary use case?

For the Azure platform, especially Azure endpoint protections and other network aspects, we utilize CloudGuard Network Security to secure the egress connection. This includes configuring and maintaining express route connectivity between on-premises and Azure.

What is most valuable?

The Identity Awareness blade and dynamic tagging in Azure are valuable because they make access management automatic. Instead of manually setting up access for each new resource, it happens automatically based on the same access policy. This dynamic setup is scalable. 

The tool is cloud-based and scalable. As our resources scale up or down, the system automatically adapts. This reduces the need for manual work, allowing us to manage the entire cloud infrastructure with a smaller workforce. It helps with automation. 

What needs improvement?

Regarding CloudGuard Network Security's integration with various resources like application gateways and application-based security groups, there's room for exploring dynamic access in those areas. A significant concern is the upgrade process. Unlike an in-place upgrade, upgrading the tool in Azure requires deploying a new resource, which can be hectic and less reliable. We have to spend something new to have the tool's latest version. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using the product for four years. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Stability is generally good, and I don't have many complaints due to its scalability. When there are hardware issues, it automatically sets up a new, healthy instance. Overall, it contributes to a stable environment for us.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution's scalability is excellent, but we do encounter some restrictions with the API on the cloud platform. This occasionally causes issues with the frequent pulling up of new resources.

How was the initial setup?

Our deployment model involves VM scale sets. We have set up instances across three environments: production, staging, and development. This structure allows for easy testing in the development environment before moving on to the production environment. We utilize Check Point's professional services to integrate, deploy, and build a cloud platform for CloudGuard Network Security.

What was our ROI?

We have seen a return on investment from CloudGuard Network Security. As more workloads shift from on-premises to the product, the costs associated with on-premises infrastructure decrease. Additionally, its dynamic and scalable nature in Azure allows us to maintain control. 

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The solution's licensing is based on the number of users of the VMs. We follow a pay-as-you-go model. Its pricing is competitive. 

What other advice do I have?

CloudGuard Network Security can manage security for both our hybrid cloud and on-premises systems. Currently, we have separate solutions for on-premises and the cloud. We also use Smart-1 Cloud from the Infinity portal. We haven't integrated the tool with both Azure and on-prem environments. 

I have about an eight out of ten confidence level in our cloud network security with the product. It is because of Azurre's robust and dynamic nature. It is easy to incorporate anything new that comes up. We can integrate any new steps in Azure concerning the blades, CloudGuard Network Security, and Check Point. 

Cloud-native firewalls lack functionalities such as IPS, which are exclusive to products like Check Point or other vendor-specific solutions. This is why we opted for CloudGuard Network Security as an additional layer, complementing the limitations of Azure's native or any cloud-native firewalls.

We are already using Check Point for our on-prem environment. The cloud solution was easy to integrate with our existing infrastructure. 

I rate the overall product a six out of ten. Due to certain limitations in the integration between Azure and CloudGuard Network Security, I currently rate the experience as a six. However, I'm hopeful that Check Point is working on its new release. 

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Nagendra Nekkala - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Manager ICT & Innovations at Bangalore International Airport Limited
Real User
Top 5
Nov 7, 2023
Comes with analytic reports but needs improvement in support
Pros and Cons
  • "The product gives analytic reports."
  • "Check Point CloudGuard Network Security should give productive reports as per business requirements. It needs to improve support since the time-limit extended beyond a day. It should include more seamless API integrations."

What is our primary use case?

Check Point CloudGuard Network Security helps to ensure the security and protection of IT systems. We have many API integrations and want to ensure its protection. 

What is most valuable?

The product gives analytic reports. 

What needs improvement?

Check Point CloudGuard Network Security should give productive reports as per business requirements. It needs to improve support since the time-limit extended beyond a day. It should include more seamless API integrations. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using the product for four years. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The product's stability is good. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Check Point CloudGuard Network Security is very much scalable. My company has 1000 users. 

How was the initial setup?

Check Point CloudGuard Network Security's deployment is easy and takes one day to complete. You need four resources to handle it. 

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The product's licensing costs are yearly. 

What other advice do I have?

I rate the product an eight out of ten. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Hybrid Cloud
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Rohit Ghorpade - PeerSpot reviewer
Cloud Network Engineer at a insurance company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
Top 20
Jul 5, 2023
An easy-to-navigate tool useful for filtering internet traffic that needs to improve its deployment speed
Pros and Cons
  • "It is a good-to-use tool that is also flexible."
  • "The deployment phase takes too much time."

What is our primary use case?

In my company, we use the solution just to secure my AWS Network Insights and inside production. We use it for security purposes.

What is most valuable?

With the solution, we just need to filter the traffic coming from the internet and Direct Connect. So it filters the traffic, basically. It permits access. In short, it just filters the traffic and permits the traffic. The aforementioned details are the purposes for which we use the tool.

What needs improvement?

We use the tool as a basic firewall. It's a technical firewall. As a technical firewall, we use SmartConsole or Check Point Firewall.

The deployment phase takes too much time. I would like the deployment to be faster.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Check Point CloudGuard Network Security for two and a half years. We are using Check Point R80.10 SmartConsole in our organization.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a seven out of ten since it takes too much time for deployment. However, it is flexible since we used to push the policy normally. It takes hardly ten seconds to install the policy. It's much easier.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I have been using the solution in my company for the last year. Other than the employees in my company, more than 25,000 users are using the solution hosted on AWS.

Basically, the application, which is hosted, is used internally. It's the same user account because it's not exposed anywhere on the internet. If anyone wants to access the solution from the internet, the traffic comes from Direct Connect, and from Direct Connect, it goes to AWS.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was not much complex. The setup phase was good enough to be able to navigate through it.

It took a long time to deploy it. We need to run this on EC2 instances, so it took almost two hours to deploy the solution. After deploying the solution slowly, and gradually, we have to push the policy on the firewall. It takes time to deploy, but it's a stable one.

The solution is deployed on the cloud. It's a software we install in EC2 instances on AWS, which we use as a firewall.

We currently have six to seven resources managing the deployments and maintenance.

What about the implementation team?

During deployment, we took technical help from Check Point.

What other advice do I have?

It is a good-to-use tool that is also flexible.

Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
SHRINKHALA SINGH - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Manager at Advertising Standards Council of India
Real User
Top 5
Aug 21, 2022
Cost-effective with good productivity and 100% proactive detection
Pros and Cons
  • "It is dynamic and agile, and its features and utilities continuously improve and evolve."
  • "The business and product development team should introduce a high-end feedback collection mechanism and analyze the customer requirements constructively."

What is our primary use case?

Check Point CloudGuard Network Security is the best security software for protecting IT systems inside out. There is no compromise with system security if the CloudGuard Network solution is intact. It provides threat prevention and protection from malware and enables system and server security up to 100%.

We have numerous API integration of our internal IT systems with outside servers and network systems, where security lapses are a huge concern. CloudGuard helped in providing complete security and protected entry of threat entrants in our system from outside servers.

How has it helped my organization?

CloudGuard Network Security has enabled the security system to operate safely without any trouble. It has resulted in saving on huge expenses for organizations as it's a cost-effective and cheap alternative compared to its market competitors. It brings a secure IT environment for a workforce, which leads to boosting productivity and an increased revenue stream for the organization. This leads to increased productivity and prosperity.

Also, it's the one-stop solution for preventing systems from security threats and all kinds of endpoints in the IT space.

What is most valuable?

There are no security lapses and 100% restriction of threat entrants in the system or server.

It's a cost-effective solution with no false positive cases.

The product helps in bringing productivity and enhanced customer experience for users.

We have a happy workforce and more workforce retention and increased IT environment sustainability.

There is 100% proactive detection of root causes and root sources.

It is dynamic and agile, and its features and utilities continuously improve and evolve.

It's the best-unified endpoint management solution for IT systems globally. The product is available for all kinds of business users.

What needs improvement?

We really believe in ongoing improvements for emerging business needs. The business and product development team should introduce a high-end feedback collection mechanism and analyze the customer requirements constructively.

The feedback mechanism is best to understand the user and market needs. All kinds and sizes of businesses should be approached to provide feedback so that unanimous decisions and unbiased reviews/feedback can be collected.

Also, more customized strategic pricing can be involved and introduced so that more and more businesses can be attracted for trial and usage of the software. 

For how long have I used the solution?

We've used the solution for almost a year now.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The product offers amazing stability and we had no discomfort or hassle in the setup.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution is scalable and attractive.

How are customer service and support?

The solution has strong customer support and agile service experience.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We use McAfee solutions earlier due to the company and parent organization's long-term association with McAfee.

After subsequent years of usage, we felt a dire need of usage of advanced security solutions. After receiving continuous good feedback from peer organizations, we landed at Check Point.

It's been a great experience so far.

How was the initial setup?

The setup is effortless and not complicated at all.

What about the implementation team?

We implemented the solution through vendor team management.

What was our ROI?

We've seen an ROI of 80% to 85%.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

In my book, Check Point comes as quite a handy and cost-effective alternative for the security enablement of IT systems. It's cheap and easy for deployment and is the best solution so far. Its signing of SLA and maintaining long-term key association and collaboration with service partners is really effortless and easy. We've had a highly professional partner experience.

Licensing is usually annual.

Setup and deployment costs are offered with discounts that are attractive and  sustainable.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We analyzed and did trials for Cisco Secure Firewall and other security solutions like Trend Micro, etc.

What other advice do I have?

I would strongly recommend everyone to go for a trial of this security solution ASAP. It is one of the best experiences ever.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Private Cloud
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Check Point CloudGuard Network Security Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: March 2026
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Check Point CloudGuard Network Security Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.