Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
reviewer1398480 - PeerSpot reviewer
Building Event-centric Data processing Architectures at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Real User
Top 20
Jan 22, 2024
The product is scalable and provides good connectors, but the ability to connect the producers and consumers must be improved
Pros and Cons
  • "The connectors provided by the solution are valuable."
  • "The ability to connect the producers and consumers must be improved."

What is our primary use case?

We use the solution for analytics for streaming. We also use it for fraud detection.

What is most valuable?

The Kafka Streams library gives quite a bit of functionality. The connectors provided by the solution are valuable.

What needs improvement?

The ability to connect the producers and consumers must be improved. It's still a pain point because a lot of development goes into it.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using the solution for seven to eight years.

Buyer's Guide
Apache Kafka
January 2026
Learn what your peers think about Apache Kafka. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2026.
879,899 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

For what it does, the tool is very stable. It is a message broker. It receives the messages and holds them for producers and consumers. It's usually everything around Kafka that has stability problems because Kafka does exactly what it's supposed to do.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Scalability is one of the main selling points of the tool. The additional nodes we add give us the additional storage capacity we need. I rate the scalability a ten out of ten. The solution is used across multiple domains in our organization. I use the product daily. It’s a continuously growing platform.

How are customer service and support?

Apache doesn't provide support. There are sites we can go to for information, but there's no support team for Apache. There are companies like Confluent and HPE that provide support for the solution.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We also use Flink and other streaming tools. We use Apache Kafka in addition to other technologies because of the requirement and the business use cases.

How was the initial setup?

It is super easy to set up. I rate the ease of setup a ten out of ten. However, building and administration get quite difficult. It takes three months to make things production-ready.

What about the implementation team?

The deployment was done in-house. We used the tools that we have in our CI/CD pipeline. We needed three people for the deployment. The infrastructure team maintains the tool. The infrastructure team has three to ten members.

What was our ROI?

We see an ROI on the product. If we don't have a tool to buffer the amount of traffic coming in from high-traffic sites, we cannot use the data. Apache Kafka gives us a resting area where we can push as much information as we want to. It’s picked up by consumers when they need it.

It’s a huge return on investment. Otherwise, we must have a system tied to the producer waiting for the consumer to consume before we can do anything with the rest of the messages. A solution like Kafka provides us with a buffer to consume the data as we choose to.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The price depends on who we are getting the product from. If we buy it from Confluent, we always have to try to negotiate the price. The price is always negotiable.

What other advice do I have?

Overall, I rate the product a six out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Hybrid Cloud
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Sreekar Nethagani - PeerSpot reviewer
Co-Founder at a tech consulting company with 11-50 employees
Real User
Jan 31, 2023
A great streaming platform with good functionality
Pros and Cons
  • "A great streaming platform."
  • "Observability could be improved."

What is our primary use case?

We are a service implementer and we supply this solution to our customers. I'm a company co-founder and we are customers of Apache. 

What is most valuable?

The solution has improved our functionality, it's one of the best streaming platforms I've used. 

What needs improvement?

I'd like to see improvement in terms of observability.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using this product for the last five years on and off. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is stable. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution is scalable.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is straightforward, it's not complicated.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

This is an open-source product.

What other advice do I have?

I rate this solution nine out of 10. 

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user