Share your experience using IBM Rational Policy Tester

The easiest route - we'll conduct a 15 minute phone interview and write up the review for you.

Use our online form to submit your review. It's quick and you can post anonymously.

Your review helps others learn about this solution
The PeerSpot community is built upon trust and sharing with peers.
It's good for your career
In today's digital world, your review shows you have valuable expertise.
You can influence the market
Vendors read their reviews and make improvements based on your feedback.
Examples of the 84,000+ reviews on PeerSpot:

Chandana K - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Consultant at VividEdge Corp
Consultant
Leaderboard
Easy to set up and helps with recording and documentation
Pros and Cons
  • "The solution helps with recording and documentation."
  • "Nothing is automatic."

What is our primary use case?

Panaya is just a documenting tool. It performs recordings and takes screenshots.

What is most valuable?

Panaya is a good documenting tool. The solution helps with recording and documentation.

What needs improvement?

We cannot create test cases. Nothing is automatic. The tool hasn’t reduced our testing time. I have to do the manual testing. The version of the solution that I am using does not have the option to integrate with workflows.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using the solution for less than six months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I rate the tool’s stability an eight out of ten.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I am the only user. I use the tool once a month. I do testing parellely. I access the product only when I need documentation. I rate the tool’s scalability a five out of ten.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is easy. The deployment takes a few hours. It’s a web tool. We can access it through a browser. We just need credentials and a recorder. We don't need anybody to help us deploy the product. We simply follow the steps on the documentation.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I rate the pricing a six or seven out of ten.

What other advice do I have?

Tosca is not available in our region. We do manual testing. I do not know if there is more to the tool, but I use it only for documenting purposes. We cannot compare Panaya with any other automated testing tool. It is good the way it is. The product might be able to integrate with tools like Jira for bug tracking. I would not recommend the tool to others. If I need to do testing, I would choose an automated testing tool. We have to do everything manually in Panaya. I rate the solution an eight out of ten for manual testing.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Flag as inappropriate
Dimitar Alexov - PeerSpot reviewer
CDO at SGROUP
Real User
Top 5
Facilitates the exchange of information between old and new applications
Pros and Cons
  • "The tool is flexible and easy to manage. We use it since it is scalable and easy to use. It integrates with solutions."
  • "Visual Studio Test Professional needs to improve its stability."

What is our primary use case?

The product is primarily used for integration with other products and applications, facilitating the exchange of information between old and new applications.

What is most valuable?

The tool is flexible and easy to manage. We use it since it is scalable and easy to use. It integrates with solutions. 

What needs improvement?

Visual Studio Test Professional needs to improve its stability. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I rate Visual Studio Test Professional's stability an eight out of ten. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I rate the product's scalability a seven to nine out of ten. 

How was the initial setup?

Visual Studio Test Professional's deployment is not complex. 

What other advice do I have?

Our larger organization has three organizations that are directly involved in working with the product. One organization focuses on security, while another is engaged in software development, particularly creating interfaces, software links, and product integrations. I rate it a seven out of ten. 

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Flag as inappropriate