Panaya is just a documenting tool. It performs recordings and takes screenshots.
The easiest route - we'll conduct a 15 minute phone interview and write up the review for you.
Use our online form to submit your review. It's quick and you can post anonymously.
Panaya is just a documenting tool. It performs recordings and takes screenshots.
Panaya is a good documenting tool. The solution helps with recording and documentation.
We cannot create test cases. Nothing is automatic. The tool hasn’t reduced our testing time. I have to do the manual testing. The version of the solution that I am using does not have the option to integrate with workflows.
I have been using the solution for less than six months.
I rate the tool’s stability an eight out of ten.
I am the only user. I use the tool once a month. I do testing parellely. I access the product only when I need documentation. I rate the tool’s scalability a five out of ten.
The initial setup is easy. The deployment takes a few hours. It’s a web tool. We can access it through a browser. We just need credentials and a recorder. We don't need anybody to help us deploy the product. We simply follow the steps on the documentation.
I rate the pricing a six or seven out of ten.
Tosca is not available in our region. We do manual testing. I do not know if there is more to the tool, but I use it only for documenting purposes. We cannot compare Panaya with any other automated testing tool. It is good the way it is. The product might be able to integrate with tools like Jira for bug tracking. I would not recommend the tool to others. If I need to do testing, I would choose an automated testing tool. We have to do everything manually in Panaya. I rate the solution an eight out of ten for manual testing.
The product is primarily used for integration with other products and applications, facilitating the exchange of information between old and new applications.
The tool is flexible and easy to manage. We use it since it is scalable and easy to use. It integrates with solutions.
Visual Studio Test Professional needs to improve its stability.
I rate Visual Studio Test Professional's stability an eight out of ten.
I rate the product's scalability a seven to nine out of ten.
Visual Studio Test Professional's deployment is not complex.
Our larger organization has three organizations that are directly involved in working with the product. One organization focuses on security, while another is engaged in software development, particularly creating interfaces, software links, and product integrations. I rate it a seven out of ten.