Share your experience using JungleWorks Bulbul

My previous company used Zendesk for ITSM (IT Service Management) products and Jira for internal development, such as HR, finance, and other departments.

It was mostly used for internal purposes and integrations because it was mobile apps related to ride-dealing, like Uber. So, it was mainly for receiving requests from the customers and scanning the stuff.

It's a very stable tool, very powerful.  

It has a huge problem regarding the price. The price increases every year. Every year, they raise the price of the licenses, which makes a lot of limitations, and you have to pay more. So that's some conditions. 

Actually, most of the companies that use Zendesk need a customer experience or customer care department. However, Zendesk only works with chatbox or emailing services, but it can also use Genesys, VoIP, or voice sensors.

Additionally, Zendesk needs the administration panels to be easier because it's a very complex panel. You need to search for a lot of things to do, like a small job. So you have to do a lot of setup regarding the integration, and it's a little bit challenging to integrate any software in the vendor.

I have experience with this solution. I worked with it for five years. 

It is a stable product. I worked on it for five or five students. It's very stable.

Scalability is normal. Not very high. At that time, there were around 1100 end users using this solution. 

The support team is time-consuming, and they don't find the answer to our problem.

Because if you are doing your job by yourself, it will be a lot of aim to seek their support. But if you have, like, a support contract with them or something like that, there's the support when you go for a good position or if they can push it. You have to pay extra for better support.

Neutral

We decided to switch from Zendesk because of limitations for integrations. We were a tech company, and we needed more features, more add-ons, more conditions with a lot of tools that weren't accessible with Zendesk, so that's why we had to change it.

The initial setup is very difficult, and we had to use support help for the account setup.

You have to pay extra for better support. So it's not only the license that you pay for, but you have to pay extra for the support as well. The pricing is expensive.

Back then, we were paying $51 per license for agents and $89-90 per license for tech users.

We were paying around $2.25 million per year.

I would suggest using a trial version first and reading the logs before using it.

Overall, I would the solution a six out of ten because of the complexity of the tool and the high license price.

OneSignal is a highly cost-effective and reliable push notification service in our organization. We needed a robust system to send multiple notifications at a time. We have been using OneSignal on a daily basis for about 5 years now to send over 50 push notifications a day without any issues, and it caters to all the countries around the globe in all major languages.

It's a tough task maintaining the attention of subscribers and bringing them back in a cost-effective way. OneSignal is highly cost-effective for our overall marketing. It is bringing users to our websites, which is a great thing.

I can send instant notifications without any delay. It provides all the necessary features for testing. It is highly cost-effective and has great customer service and support.

I would appreciate a faster and easier way to create more automations and flows.

I have been using it for 5 years.

We previously used the Ping Identity Platform. OneSignal is much more robust and user-friendly, free to use, and integrates with many more services. It offers easy localization of the push, and A/B tests and templates work great.

OneSignal is a very cost-effective and highly affordable tool.

We considered Slack and WordPress.

It is a great tool for users who don't need comprehensive setups to send push notifications. It took just 5 minutes to get everything integrated and up and running.