The easiest route - we'll conduct a 15 minute phone interview and write up the review for you.
Use our online form to submit your review. It's quick and you can post anonymously.
My previous company used Zendesk for ITSM (IT Service Management) products and Jira for internal development, such as HR, finance, and other departments.
It was mostly used for internal purposes and integrations because it was mobile apps related to ride-dealing, like Uber. So, it was mainly for receiving requests from the customers and scanning the stuff.
It's a very stable tool, very powerful.
It has a huge problem regarding the price. The price increases every year. Every year, they raise the price of the licenses, which makes a lot of limitations, and you have to pay more. So that's some conditions.
Actually, most of the companies that use Zendesk need a customer experience or customer care department. However, Zendesk only works with chatbox or emailing services, but it can also use Genesys, VoIP, or voice sensors.
Additionally, Zendesk needs the administration panels to be easier because it's a very complex panel. You need to search for a lot of things to do, like a small job. So you have to do a lot of setup regarding the integration, and it's a little bit challenging to integrate any software in the vendor.
I have experience with this solution. I worked with it for five years.
It is a stable product. I worked on it for five or five students. It's very stable.
Scalability is normal. Not very high. At that time, there were around 1100 end users using this solution.
The support team is time-consuming, and they don't find the answer to our problem.
Because if you are doing your job by yourself, it will be a lot of aim to seek their support. But if you have, like, a support contract with them or something like that, there's the support when you go for a good position or if they can push it. You have to pay extra for better support.
Neutral
We decided to switch from Zendesk because of limitations for integrations. We were a tech company, and we needed more features, more add-ons, more conditions with a lot of tools that weren't accessible with Zendesk, so that's why we had to change it.
The initial setup is very difficult, and we had to use support help for the account setup.
You have to pay extra for better support. So it's not only the license that you pay for, but you have to pay extra for the support as well. The pricing is expensive.
Back then, we were paying $51 per license for agents and $89-90 per license for tech users.
We were paying around $2.25 million per year.
I would suggest using a trial version first and reading the logs before using it.
Overall, I would the solution a six out of ten because of the complexity of the tool and the high license price.
My main use case for monday.com is CRM and people management. Most of what we use is as a CRM.
One specific example of how I use monday.com for CRM and people management is that one of our clients has a business process that can get a lead from Facebook. I use monday.com to integrate their Meta account so they can get their leads from Facebook to monday.com and nurture their customer inside monday.com.
One of the best features I created in monday.com is the automations. The leads can automatically go to another board and proceed to another pipeline in monday.com.
In my opinion, the best features monday.com offers are the AI, then automation and the workflow. This helps business processes to be seamless.
I have seen specific outcomes or metrics improve, including time saved, better team collaboration, and other measurable results in work management and our team's work.
I think monday.com can be improved by having more integration to other applications. Integration is needed because some of our clients want to have a native integration in their monday.com and existing application.
I have been working in my current field for five years.
In my experience, monday.com is stable. I like monday.com and love using it because it is a friendly user application.
monday.com's scalability is great. monday.com can handle our needs, especially in project management tasks.
For monday.com support, I think they need to explain more deeply in the product knowledge.
We used Freshdesk ticket before monday.com because they did not have automation like monday.com. monday.com is friendly, unlike Freshdesk.
I have seen a return on investment with monday.com, specifically time saved. Because of the automation, and money saved because some of our revenue has become increasing.
I have experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for monday.com.
We did not evaluate other options before choosing monday.com. We just chose monday.com.
If you're looking for something that can help you in project management or CRM, monday.com is what you need. monday.com is the best, and I would rate monday.com a nine out of ten because some of the features, particularly integration, need improvement so other clients or users can use monday.com seamlessly.
