Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Share your experience using senhasegura Access Management

The easiest route - we'll conduct a 15 minute phone interview and write up the review for you.

Use our online form to submit your review. It's quick and you can post anonymously.

Your review helps others learn about this solution
The PeerSpot community is built upon trust and sharing with peers.
It's good for your career
In today's digital world, your review shows you have valuable expertise.
You can influence the market
Vendors read their reviews and make improvements based on your feedback.
Examples of the 102,000+ reviews on PeerSpot:

Jyothikumar C - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Engineering Manager at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Top 5
Jan 30, 2025
Streamlined access management through integration and simplified setup
Pros and Cons
  • "Teleport has replaced earlier methods like a bastion server or a jump server, which required connecting to physical servers."
  • "I recommend it for its straightforward setup and strong security features."
  • "I cannot download or share session recordings directly with others, which would be useful for documentation or reviews."
  • "I cannot download or share session recordings directly with others, which would be useful for documentation or reviews."

What is our primary use case?

I use Teleport to replace the normal authentication mechanism as part of a zero-trust architecture. It is particularly useful because, in a remote environment, I cannot trust any devices. I can share access remotely with anyone via a browser for more secure tracking of data.

What is most valuable?

Teleport has replaced earlier methods like a bastion server or a jump server, which required connecting to physical servers. It integrates well with single sign-on (SSO) and Ansible Playbooks, allowing me to manage inventories easily. 

Teleport provides a straightforward setup process with a single command line, making it easier to manage the onboarding and offboarding of team members.

What needs improvement?

I cannot download or share session recordings directly with others, which would be useful for documentation or reviews. 

Additionally, while the backend worker can be upgraded, there is a limitation with scaling, as it supports only a single node even in Kubernetes.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Teleport for two years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Initially, there were stability issues when integrating with single sign-on and storing sessions. After resolving them, Teleport has been stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Teleport supports only a single node in the Kubernetes environment, which limits its scalability. It is straightforward for single standalone components, however, the UI component cannot be upgraded directly.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Previously, I used a jump server and accessed systems with an SSH key and a normal VM login. 

I switched to Teleport since colleagues and friends recommended it, highlighting its enterprise-level capabilities.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was straightforward due to my expertise in Linux, particularly Red Hat and Ubuntu operating systems. I found the setup to be very easy.

What was our ROI?

With Teleport, my time spent on onboarding and offboarding has reduced significantly. I no longer need to manually manage access, which saves time and effort.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Another option I considered was HashiCorp's Boundary, however, it had a complex setup that was difficult for beginners. Teleport's straightforward setup was more appealing.

What other advice do I have?

I rate Teleport nine out of ten. 

Security-wise, it is very secure and easy to use for remote access. I recommend it for its straightforward setup and strong security features.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Other
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
reviewer1413921 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sales Executive at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Real User
Top 20
Feb 7, 2026
Single sign-on has simplified access and lifecycle management for all corporate applications
Pros and Cons
  • "Okta Platform is a great product and one of the best."
  • "It would be great if there were a way to save even my social media passwords and other passwords through Okta Platform and single sign-on through Okta Platform in the future."

What is our primary use case?

It is for Single Sign-on and Multi-Factor Authentication.

What is most valuable?

It is very easy to log in to all my various corporate accounts through Okta Platform. This helps me because I do not need to have any password. I just simply log into Okta Platform which has a single sign-on capability.

This helps us whenever our employees, our new employees come into the company. On first login, when they come into the company, they have access to all our corporate accounts already once they have their corporate account. They can log into their various productivity and corporate applications. This helps ease the burden from our IT support team to have to onboard someone manually. When someone leaves the company, having an IT team have to remove their access one by one is a very difficult process. Okta Platform Lifecycle Management helps us offboard those employees who have left the company more easily.

What needs improvement?

It would be great if there were a way to save even my social media passwords and other passwords through Okta Platform and single sign-on through Okta Platform in the future. I do not think they have this capability just yet.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using this for six years.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

There were some alternatives like JumpCloud and Ping Identity that we were evaluating. However, since we are a partner, we prefer Okta Platform. There is a bias towards Okta Platform.

How was the initial setup?

I would say the setup difficulty was in the middle, depending on circumstances. For us, it was quite simple because we had everything in place. We just needed to integrate the Single Sign-on and the directory with our Google Workspace or our current IDP. It was pretty straightforward and took a couple of days.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Regarding pricing, as mentioned, we are a partner, so we do get a special big discount as a partner versus other customers.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

There were some alternatives like JumpCloud and Ping Identity that we were evaluating.

What other advice do I have?

Okta Platform is a great product and one of the best. We are a partner and have been using it for six years. We have four engineers on our team. We do not use the PAM and do not need it. I would rate this product nine out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Other
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Partner
Last updated: Feb 7, 2026
Flag as inappropriate