Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Share your experience using CxEngage

The easiest route - we'll conduct a 15 minute phone interview and write up the review for you.

Use our online form to submit your review. It's quick and you can post anonymously.

Your review helps others learn about this solution
The PeerSpot community is built upon trust and sharing with peers.
It's good for your career
In today's digital world, your review shows you have valuable expertise.
You can influence the market
Vendors read their reviews and make improvements based on your feedback.
Examples of the 98,000+ reviews on PeerSpot:

Antoneil Phillips - PeerSpot reviewer
Operations Manager at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees
Real User
Top 20Leaderboard
Real-time adjustments enhance call management, though pricing needs improvement
Pros and Cons
  • "Some of the best features with NICE CXone are the real-time visibility that you have, which empowers you to make adjustments on the fly, such as turning on and off your queues and adjusting how we route calls to our agents."
  • "Compared to challengers such as Zoom, which seem more cost-effective, NICE CXone's suite of products is very modular, so as they provide new services, you have to add to your existing package and this balloons your costs since there's an additional license needed to use the new tools."

What is our primary use case?

We're working in the finance space, banking, and our customers that we support are primarily banks and remittance services. We are a contact center providing services to other businesses, primarily by phone, but we're currently looking at diversifying the channels with omnichannel support such as chat, email, and social media.

What is most valuable?

Some of the best features with NICE CXone are the real-time visibility that you have, which empowers you to make adjustments on the fly, such as turning on and off your queues and adjusting how we route calls to our agents.

We can monitor their activity in real time and manage the traffic as needed, flexing up by increasing the number of ports to ensure that none of our calls are dropped or reskilling our agents based on choices made in our IVR.

The reporting isn't bad, but there are opportunities for improvement; we get real-time dashboards for monitoring, though for performance management, we have to procure certain reports manually by pulling down raw data from the system, which could be better.

What needs improvement?

The reporting isn't bad, but there are opportunities for improvement; we get real-time dashboards for monitoring, though for performance management, we have to procure certain reports manually by pulling down raw data from the system, which could be better.

Regarding the pricing, this would be an area of opportunity as well; this feedback is based on where we're positioned in the Caribbean. Compared to challengers such as Zoom, which seem more cost-effective, NICE CXone's suite of products is very modular, so as they provide new services, you have to add to your existing package and this balloons your costs since there's an additional license needed to use the new tools, leading to potentially higher out-of-pocket expenses.

For how long have I used the solution?

We've had experience with this product since 2020.

How are customer service and support?

The response time can vary depending on the resource you need; they have 24-hour support for basic issues, but if the issue is network-related or involves configuration, or maybe implementing a new tool, it might take north of 24 hours to identify the right resource to assist you.

On a scale of 1 to 10, I would rate their customer service or technical support about a six and a half.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Neutral

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

The solution I'm most familiar with is NICE CXone.

What other advice do I have?

I really can't add any value about how it's influenced our customer journey just yet because we're just in the process of implementing that and have no data at this stage.

Overall, NICE CXone is not a bad product at all. There are some opportunities for improvement that could make NICE CXone a solid offering—it's a great tool that is very intuitive and doesn't give us much headache to use, but the support could improve. If they could address the issues I've mentioned, they would have a really nice product.

I rate NICE CXone a seven out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Flag as inappropriate
Voice Engineer at Softtek
Real User
Top 20
Enables seamless integration with leading customer support platforms and offers reliable and scalable communication solutions
Pros and Cons
  • "The feature I find best about Amazon Connect, which is currently on trend, is the artificial intelligence; it helps us maintain continuity with the client—for instance, if a client calls for a ticket and calls again after three days, we can keep the same ticket or request to provide follow-up with the same agent or person."
  • "I consider that there are other applications that could accomplish the same tasks in an easier way, but the cost of the product is somewhat expensive."

What is our primary use case?

I used to work with Amazon Connect at a company where we had proof of concept labs that we offered to clients. My co-workers and I designed products to offer to clients, including integration with Salesforce or integration with Zendesk. These are the most demanded integrations that clients seek in contact center applications.

Additionally, we worked with the standard features that Amazon Connect has, such as the design and configuration of flows and IVRs, configuration of queues, and other essential functions that every contact center application should have.

What is most valuable?

The feature I find best about Amazon Connect, which is currently on trend, is the artificial intelligence. It helps us maintain continuity with the client. For instance, if a client calls for a ticket and calls again after three days, we can keep the same ticket or request to provide follow-up with the same agent or person. That is a valuable feature.

Another important capability I discovered is that, from a technical perspective, you can select the caller ID in such a way that if one of your direct numbers fails, you can select another one to proceed with the calls. The system is not dependent on one calling number.

What needs improvement?

In terms of improvements for Amazon Connect, it has numerous features that should be enhanced, and the price could be one of them. I consider that there are other applications that could accomplish the same tasks in an easier way, but the cost of the product is somewhat expensive.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Amazon Connect since one year ago.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Regarding the stability of Amazon Connect, in my case, the stability is 100%. At the moment, it remains at 100%. I have never experienced any issues regarding failover or any failure in the cloud. It is completely reliable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The scalability of Amazon Connect is something that AWS always offers us. It is a native feature that AWS has because scalability is part of the nature of this product. Since it operates within AWS, all the applications can be scaled easily.

How are customer service and support?

My impression of the support team from Amazon on a scale from one to 10 would be a seven. This rating is because globally, there are not enough engineers with sufficient experience with Amazon Connect. While it is not a new product, the people who provide support don't have enough experience in my consideration.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup and deployment of Amazon Connect are straightforward and super streamlined.

What was our ROI?

Amazon Connect is worth the money to have as a tool. It is one of the three most valuable contact center applications available nowadays.

What other advice do I have?

Amazon Connect is not an easy tool to use for everyone. Based on my experience as a voice engineer without experience as a developer or relations with Python or C++, I consider that these new applications are more focused on developers. Every application or feature that clients request tends to be developed by developers because it integrates more coding and developer skills. For those more focused on voice protocols without coding experience, the learning curve is quite difficult.

A significant advantage is that you can download and work with a free tier with Amazon Connect. You can create products, new features, or proof of concepts for clients with this feature. This capability is not possible with Genesis, as you need to be a partner or have similar credentials.

I would recommend Amazon Connect to organizations seeking an easy application if they have engineers without extensive experience. For companies with a development team, they can work together effectively. If you have sufficient budget and want to invest in a robust application, this solution is ideal.

On a scale of 1-10, I rate Amazon Connect a 9 out of 10.

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Flag as inappropriate