Share your experience using Flockport

I use the solution in my company since we have some in-house applications, and to spin up those applications, we use Docker Enterprise.

The most valuable features of the solution are its fairly good UI design and its ability to let users view logs.

Though I am unsure, I feel that the product lacks to offer a proper health status of the images which are running, making it an area where improvements are required.

I have been using Mirantis Container Cloud for six months. I work with the tool's desktop version. I am just a user of the tool.

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

Around 20 people in my company use the product.

The solution offers a good online community that offers users the option to ask questions related to the product and get answers to troubleshoot the issues.

The product's initial setup phase is simple.

The solution is deployed on an on-premises model.

I rate the product price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one means low price and ten means high price.

Maybe the other people in my company's environment might be using Doctor Enterprise to manage multi-cloud Kubernetes environments, but I don't use it for that.

The product optimizes and makes DevOps workflow better since it spins up images very fast, and it is a good thing that I have seen in the tool. It is easy to manage which Docker needs to be run and which one needs to be stopped, and it is an area where I use the product the most.

I don't use the tool's centralized management console. I use it individually.

I use the single dashboard option provided by the tool, and if I need to be helpful.

I recommend the product to those who plan to use it.

I rate the tool a ten out of ten.

I use it to containerize microservices. It's a comprehensive container solution for managing microservices.

It streamlines the operation of our e-commerce systems for major brands, making deployment easy and cost-effective.

It significantly simplifies our deployment and management processes. We've containerized over ten microservices, improving efficiency and deployment speed.

For Kubernetes management, the key thing is managing containers. It reduces errors compared to traditional servers. Since containers are lighter weight, deploying them is faster. Think about it this way - if an image is smaller and lighter, you can install it much quicker. This is especially beneficial when you need to deploy a large number of containers, potentially in just minutes or even seconds.

The multi-cloud support has positively influenced our maintenance and operational efficiency.

More integrations with other platforms would be beneficial.

I have been using it for more than five years. 

It is a stable solution. It is nearly perfect. I would rate the stability a ten out of ten. 

It is a scalable solution. I would rate the scalability a ten out of ten. 

It was extensively used in our company. There were around a thousand end users using it. 

Deployment time varies depending on the cluster configuration. Sometimes, it can take days. It depends on the configuration of the clusters. In some cases, like the configuration assessment can take longer. But that's not because of Docker itself.

It's just because we might not have information about the Docker configuration, for example. Let's say you have a cluster in another Kubernetes environment, and you want to use a port from that other cluster on your current Kubernetes cluster. That can make things more complex.

We used a consultant's help.

I recommend it.

Overall, I would rate the solution a seven out of ten.