No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
it_user509226 - PeerSpot reviewer
Network Administrator at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees
Vendor
Oct 21, 2016
It gives us the latency performance that we wanted.
Pros and Cons
  • "Latency is definitely the big key for us."
  • "I think this product hits all the big features of all the SANs that are out there, all the storage vendors that are out there and more."
  • "Some of the nice to haves for us, in terms of today, would be VVols but again, it’s not a critical feature."
  • "I'd give it a perfect rating if I could push it to 300,000 IOPS like they promote; we just haven't been able to push that many IOPS out of our system."

What is most valuable?

Latency is definitely the big key for us. Obviously all flash with the IOPS was also important, but I think latency was the bigger key to give us the performance that we wanted.

What needs improvement?

In terms of what we're looking for, I don’t see anything critical at the moment. Some of the nice to haves for us, in terms of today, would be VVols but again, it’s not a critical feature. We can continue to use what we use now.

I'd give it a perfect rating if I could push it to 300,000 IOPS like they promote; we just haven't been able to push that many IOPS out of our system.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It's been absolutely stable and consistent. We have not run into any issues at all. We try to push it. We can't push it as far as we need, I guess, or our applications can't push it. We know it's capable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Scalability was one of the key factors for us on our purchase. We haven't needed to scale yet but in the future, if we do need to, it's certainly a consideration we're going to play a part in.

Buyer's Guide
Kaminario K2 [EOL]
June 2026
Learn what your peers think about Kaminario K2 [EOL]. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2026.
902,456 professionals have used our research since 2012.

How are customer service and support?

The couple of technical support calls we've made, they've been proactive, very good about that; so that's been good. I have no qualms about the support either.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Part of the reason my company started using it was that we had an older SAN that was going end of life, so we had to research and buy a new SAN to replace the SAN that was going end of life. The current marketplace was kind of in between hybrids and all flash, so we decided to go all flash. Kaminario came up in regard to the research.

How was the initial setup?

Initial setup was straightforward; it was easy. The installer, the technician that came in, he was very straightforward and very easy going. It was incredibly fast compared to the past installs we've done before.

What other advice do I have?

When we start working with a vendor like Kaminario, we look for longevity. We look for a company that has a good report. We look for compatibility with the software that we use. Those are big keys for us.

I think this product hits all the big features of all the SANs that are out there, all the storage vendors that are out there and more. In terms of performance, scalability, scaling out, scaling up, it's all there.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
it_user509229 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior DevOps Engineer at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees
Vendor
Sep 13, 2016
We were looking for a solution that offers block-level deduplication.
Pros and Cons
  • "The capacity that we're saving by using Kaminario's K2 is giving us a four-to-one ratio for our deduplication."
  • "Our holdup was disk I/O, so we did a PoC with Kaminario and we reduced build times down to fifteen minutes for a full build from two hours."
  • "I would like to see LDAP for the management panel; I've been notified they might be currently working on it."

How has it helped my organization?

The biggest thing for us, second to the performance, is that we were looking for a solution that offers block-level deduplication. Right now, the capacity that we're saving by using Kaminario's K2 is giving us a four-to-one ratio for our deduplication. We're using it specifically and exclusively for block level; we probably have about 300 VMs just in our studio alone and of that, I believe that we probably have half of that or more running on the K2. It's saving us a lot of storage.

What needs improvement?

I would like to see LDAP for the management panel; I've been notified they might be currently working on it. That is probably the biggest feature that we wanted; otherwise, everything has been just a champion with it, we've been really happy with it.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It’s been extremely stable. The last time we brought Kaminario down was to do a firmware upgrade, so our uptime before that was months, and months, and months.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I believe it will scale to meet your company's needs going forward. I like the way that they have designed it to scale up and out. We're looking at eventually adding some more capacity to it, because I believe that we're using probably about 85% at the moment.

How are customer service and technical support?

Support's amazing. When it came time for the flash upgrade, our rep contacted us, and put us in touch with their engineering team. I had a guy on the phone with a remote session, running through the firmware upgrade; everything went flawlessly. And it was a live upgrade too, we didn't even have to bring the array down.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

The main reason we started using it was our continuous integration environment. We had a product before that was 15,000 RPM SAS spinning discs; build times were at about two hours. Our holdup was disk I/O, so we did a PoC with Kaminario and we reduced build times down to fifteen minutes for a full build from two hours. That was the best part about it.

What other advice do I have?

When I decide to work with a vendor like Kaminario, I look for, honestly, cost effectiveness. I like the most bang for our buck. I definitely look at performance metrics. I'm not so much interested in whether they're a big power player like EMC or Dell or anything like that. To me, the truth is in the numbers.

As far as advice, I'd recommend, if they're looking for a flash-based solution for high throughput, low latency, and high IOPS, check out Kaminario's K2, because so far it's worked for us; we've provided a testimony for them. Honestly, for us to stretch ourselves out there and do that, it's been amazing for us.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Kaminario K2 [EOL]
June 2026
Learn what your peers think about Kaminario K2 [EOL]. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2026.
902,456 professionals have used our research since 2012.
it_user509223 - PeerSpot reviewer
System Engineer - R&D at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
MSP
Sep 13, 2016
The ratio between the physical storage and the storage we use is high.
Pros and Cons
  • "The ratio between the physical storage and the storage we use is very high."
  • "It has a very good duplication rate; very, very good."
  • "I think it should have better performance with small files. With big data, its performance is top notch, but it is difficult to load small files."

Valuable Features

It has a very good duplication rate; very, very good. The ratio between the physical storage and the storage we use is very high. Good performance.

Room for Improvement

I think it should have better performance with small files. With big data, its performance is top notch, but it is difficult to load small files.

Stability Issues

We had problems before. It crashed a couple of times, but we had good support from Kaminario. They gave us another storage app and we could replicate between the two, so if the crashes continued, we had another app. They fixed the crashing problem and since then, it's been okay.

Scalability Issues

I think it is scalable. You can buy another shelf any time you need one.

Customer Service and Technical Support

Technical support is very good. We had quick response for anything we needed.

Initial Setup

Initial setup is straight forward; very simple, web administration.

Other Advice

It's a good solution. I think it’s a bit expensive. As a technical guy, I don't look at that side very much. It's a good solution overall.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
it_user509214 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Engineer at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
Vendor
Sep 13, 2016
It gave us a better dedupe rate on our mixed workload, including SQL backend infrastructure.
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable feature is definitely the always-on data deduplication."
  • "It is consistently stable; haven't had a single issue with it."
  • "On the road map, I'm hoping to see Active Directory integration. Right now, you still have to use a local admin account to log in and manage everything."

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature is definitely the always-on data deduplication.

What needs improvement?

On the road map, I'm hoping to see Active Directory integration. Right now, you still have to use a local admin account to log in and manage everything. That's really the only downfall as of the moment. I'd like to be able to have all of my Active Directory users support this infrastructure and be able to audit who logged in and did what. Right now, it's limited to local account access, so AD integration has to happen.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It is consistently stable; haven't had a single issue with it. We performed a live firmware upgrade during production, 9 AM Monday morning, failed everything over from one control to the next. Nobody even noticed.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It is going to meet our scalability needs. With the K-block architecture, we have the ability to expand two more full shelves if we need to. We got the dual controllers; a single shelf now with 20 TB raw in each location, and we're getting about 65 TB out of the array. It's amazing.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We needed to get off our old VNX, so we did a test pilot against Kaminario, Pure Storage, and Nimble Storage. We got a device and racked them all together in the data center and for 90 days, we shifted application workloads from each array and did performance benchmark testing. Kaminario won. Putting those spreadsheets side by side, Kaminario came on top. Nimble was just gone; they just couldn't perform compared to Pure and Kaminario.

For the second half of the POC, it was down to Kaminario and Pure. It was head to head. It really was, but Kaminario gave us a better dedupe rate on our mixed workload, including SQL back end infrastructure, so we went ahead and went with Kaminario.

I have to add also that Kaminario's engineering team is customer oriented all the way. Pure Storage had more of an attitude that they’re the best, and they brought that attitude with them and treated us more like a customer instead of a partner. That's where Kaminario really shines.

What other advice do I have?

I definitely recommend giving it a shot. Kaminario will let you try it for free. They'll let you run your production workload on it. They pretty much hold your hand the whole way. There's nothing really bad that could happen that I could see. The dashboard's too easy. The engineering team is too easy.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
it_user509217 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Manager Of Infrastructure Services at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Vendor
Sep 13, 2016
Speed has been the most valuable feature. We like how it is easy to spin up a LUN and get going.
Pros and Cons
  • "Ease of use: My installers - my administrators over the system - they love how easy and fast it is to install and spin up a LUN and get going."
  • "Go with it. I tell people all the time they need to take a serious look at it."
  • "I would like to see them work with Cisco, so it comes off the FIs, instead of having to go through my 10-gig network."

Valuable Features

For us, the valuable feature has really been the speed. We moved from a Fusion IO card right on the PCI bus. We moved a 2 TB one over, and we didn't lose any speed, no degradation; everything just ran great. That's been one of our biggest features.

Ease of use: My installers - my administrators over the system - they love how easy and fast it is to install and spin up a LUN and get going.

Room for Improvement

As of right now, I haven't done a whole lot of work on it. I would like to see them work with Cisco, so it comes off the FIs, instead of having to go through my 10-gig network. One extra hop is not a big deal, but it’d be a little bit faster if we can get it right to the back point of my FIs. I think that's the biggest feature I would like to see come down the line.

Stability Issues

It has been one of the most stable solutions so far that I've seen. Obviously, we're 10 months into it. We have not had any problems with it.

When we've had minor issues, we've had calls with support and they were able to resolve them fast, easy. Everybody was straightforward. It's been a very transparent company with us, so we're very happy in that aspect.

Scalability Issues

Based on everything I have read and seen, it's a very scalable solution; it can scale out, scale up. That's one of the reasons we chose to go with it, because we felt like in the future we could move forward with it.

Customer Service and Technical Support

Support has been great. While I have never had to personally call, I've had my administrators call. Every time we called and had an issue, they are on it. They are fast. They are timely. They are clear and precise on their answers, and generally willing to help out. Sometimes when you call tech support, or a support company, you just don't get that feeling they want to be there. On the other hand, these guys are excited about the technology and want to help out.

Initial Setup

Initial setup was really straight forward. It was very easy. They did send out two people including my sales engineer at the time to install it, but the install was great. They were very thorough. They walked my engineer through every last little step, what needed done. Ever since then, we've managed it ourselves.

Other Advice

Go with it. I tell people all the time they need to take a serious look at it. If they're looking for speed, reliability, and the deduplication that they'll be getting out of it, this is definitely a great product to look at.

My rating mainly reflects that I'm not using its full potential. I want to see what it can do. But it's up there. It's a really good product.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
it_user448698 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Systems Engineer in the Storage & Systems Practice at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Consultant
May 30, 2016
Straightforward GUI, no issues with performance and it is easy to use.
Pros and Cons
  • "The GUI is very straightforward and easy to use."
  • "The K2 has basically removed storage as a bottleneck in our datacenter."
  • "There are a few areas where the system could be improved. Examples would be that the system currently has a 15TB LUN size limit and that snapshots need to be scheduled through script API instead of the GUI."

How has it helped my organization?

The K2 has basically removed storage as a bottleneck in our datacenter. Everything comes off the K2 at sub-millisecond speed.

What is most valuable?

Speed and ease of use. The system is very quick to get installed and up and running. The GUI is very straightforward and easy to use. Performance is exceptional.

What needs improvement?

There are a few areas where the system could be improved. Examples would be that the system currently has a 15TB LUN size limit and that snapshots need to be scheduled through script API instead of the GUI. These are items that will be addressed in future firmware releases.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

We've experienced no issues with performance.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We haven't needed to scale it yet.

How are customer service and technical support?

Have not had any components fail yet. Customer service emails me when they have new firmware and they upgrade it for me.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We have used several different storage solutions. We like the K2 because of its speed and simplicity.

How was the initial setup?

Deployment time from the box to LUNs presented to VMware was four hours.

What about the implementation team?

We are a Kaminario VAR but Kaminario still did the implementation.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Kaminario is very competitive on price. They also have a pay per TB model.

What other advice do I have?

As with any all flash array, deduplication and compression rates are important factors in calculating usable capacity. A dedupe assessment will help a lot.


Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. We are a reseller for Kaminario as well as several other storage vendors.
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
Virtualization Consultant at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Consultant
Nov 2, 2015
Knowing it can scale up and out, that would mean that it could hold around 154 TB of Flash.
Pros and Cons
  • "Looking at what changed at Kaminario the last couple of months (and the last couple of years, for that matter) I’m certain we’ll see a lot of great innovation from Kaminario in their upcoming releases."
  • "What I think would be a great idea for Kaminario is more visibility outside the US, when my customers start talking about AFA I notice they almost never talk about Kaminario, mainly because they just don’t know about them, and there are no local sales team to tell them about the Kaminario offering."

Originally posted at https://www.vdicloud.nl/2015/09/09/kaminario-7-months-after-storage-field-day-7/ 

All Flash Arrays (AFA) are hot for a couple of years now, and for a good reason! During Storage Field Day 1 we had 3 AFA vendors presenting with Kaminario, NimbusData and PureStorage. Although they have a different go-to-market strategies, as well as a different technology strategies, all three are still standing (allthough 1 of them seems to be struggling…)

At Storage Field Day 7 we had the privilege to get another Kaminario presentation and in this post I would like to take some time to see what Kaminario offers, and what new features they presented the last couple of months.

The K2 All-Flash Array

There are couple of features provided by Kaminario that I find interesting (based on what was included 6 months ago):

  • Choice of FC or ISCSI
  • VMware integration (VAAI, vvols (not yet))
  • Non-disruptive upgrades
  • Great GUI
  • Inline deduplication and compression
  • Scale Up and Out
  • K-Raid protection
  • Industry standard SSD warranty (7 years now)

But there are/were still a couple of things missing, but it might be even better and go back a couple of years and see what the Kaminario solution looked like back then. A great post to look at the Kaminario solution back 2012 is the one of Hans De Leenheer:

Kaminario – a Solid State startup worth following

As you can see, there is so much innovation done by Kaminario, and in the last 6 months a lot more has been done.

What’s new in Kaminario K2 v5.5?

In the last couple of weeks Kaminario released the 5.5 version of their K2 product. In this release a couple of new (awesome) features were introduced that we’ll investigate a little deeper:

  • Use of 3D TLC NAND
  • Replication (asynchronous)
  • Perpetual Array (Mix and match SSD/Controller)

Let’s start with the use of 3D TLC NAND. In earlier versions of their products Kaminario always used MLC NAND and a customer could choose between 400 and 800 GB MLC SSD’s. Knowing Kaminario can scale up and out that would mean that it could hold around 154 TB of Flash (with dedupe and compression this would go up to around 720+ TB according to kaminario documents). With the new 3D flash technology the size of the drives changed to 480, 960 GB MLC and a 1,92 TB TLC SSD which doubles the capacity:

The next new feature is Replication, although the documentation found on the Kaminario site on replication goes back to 2014, but it still mentioned in the what’s new in v5.5 documents. Something that is new with replication is the fact that Kaminario now integrates with VMware SRM to meet customer needs. This is great news for customers already using SRM or thinking about using. The way Kaminario does replication is based on their snapshot (application consistent).

Last but not least is Perpetual Array, which gives a customer the possibilty to mix and match SSD’s as well as Controller’s. This feature gives the customer the freedom to start building their storage system and continue growing even if Kaminario will change controller hardware or SSD technology.

Final thoughts

Looking at what changed at Kaminario the last couple of months (and the last couple of years, for that matter) I’m certain we’ll see a lot of great innovation from Kaminario in their upcoming releases. 3D NAND will get Kaminario to much bigger scale (ever heard of Samsung showing a 16 TB 3D TLC SSD), and with their Scale Up and Scale out technology Kaminario has the right solution for each and every business. What I think would be a great idea for Kaminario is more visibilty outside the US, when my customers start talking about AFA I notice they almost never talk about Kaminario, mainly because they jut don’t know about them, and there are no local sales team to tell them about the Kaminario offering. That’s just to bad, as I still think Kaminario is a very cool AFA vendor. It was also great to see them as a sponsor at TechUnplugged Amsterdam, which is a start :D.

Disclaimer: I was invited to this meeting by TechFieldDay to attend SFD7 and they paid for travel and accommodation, I have not been compensated for my time and am not obliged to blog. Furthermore, the content is not reviewed, approved or edited by any other person than the me.


Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Storage Administrator at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Dec 31, 2014
​Improved performance by more than 50x on our application but replication and de-duplication could be better.
Pros and Cons
  • "Improved performance by more than 50x on our application."
  • "Replication and de-duplication could be better."

What is most valuable?

Performance.

How has it helped my organization?

Improved performance by more than 50x on our application.

What needs improvement?

Replication and de-duplication could be better.

For how long have I used the solution?

1.5 yrs.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

No issues with deployment.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

One time, there was a node failure and host lost connectivity.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Yes, need to halt the system in order to scale it out (but I guess in the later version, they can scale on the fly - not sure).

How are customer service and technical support?

Customer Service:

Good Customer Service.

Technical Support:

Good Technical Support.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

No, no other flash solution, we moved from spinning disks to flash.

How was the initial setup?

It was pretty much straightforward, vendor came in and installed the array.

What about the implementation team?

We implemented thru a vendor team. The vendor team was knowledgeable.

What was our ROI?

Positive ROI.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Yes, we did POC with bunch of other Flash vendors and choose K2 over them.

What other advice do I have?

If you are looking for a perf, K2 is the one. But it still lags behind the replication and de-duplication of other vendors.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
it_user362382 - PeerSpot reviewer
it_user362382Storage Sales Consultant at a tech company with 10,001+ employees
Real User

Great feedback on an exceptional product. Keep in mind the software suite is "all inclusive' a huge cost savings over comparable offerings from the legacy storage companies.