TamunoibitonAdoki - PeerSpot reviewer
Security Engineer at Globus Bank
Real User
Top 20
Comes with flexible and affordable pricing that suits small and medium enterprises
Pros and Cons
  • "The tool's pricing is flexible and affordable for small and medium enterprises."
  • "I have worked with IBM before, and I prefer its ease of deployment and management. Imperva SecureSphere Database Security has tricky deployment, whereas IBM's deployment is straightforward because of the UI."

What needs improvement?

I have worked with IBM before, and I prefer its ease of deployment and management. Imperva SecureSphere Database Security has tricky deployment, whereas IBM's deployment is straightforward because of the UI.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using the solution for three years.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The tool's pricing is flexible and affordable for small and medium enterprises.

What other advice do I have?

I rate the product an eight out of ten.

Buyer's Guide
Imperva SecureSphere Database Security
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about Imperva SecureSphere Database Security. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user
Network Engineer at CBN
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
Up-to-date inventory management and compliance
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable feature is the automatic reports on new databases, which gives us up-to-date inventory management."
  • "Sometimes the reports are cumbersome, and you have to drill down to get more information."

What is our primary use case?

I use SecureSphere to monitor our core databases and privilege operations by administrators, and to provide compliance reports.

How has it helped my organization?

In terms of regulatory compliance, one of the key requirements is to ensure that our core databases are monitored. SecureSphere allows us to generate details to prove that we're compliant with all requirements.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature is the automatic reports on new databases, which gives us up-to-date inventory management.

What needs improvement?

Sometimes the reports are cumbersome, and you have to drill down to get more information. SecureSphere also sometimes needs a lot of maintenance to keep the agents running on the database. In the next release, Imperva should include a preventative solution that will stop an attack before it happens or read the behavior of particular accounts and act on it. They should also make SecureSphere available on mobile so that if an administrator isn't on-prem, he can access the solution via the internet wherever he may be.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using this solution for almost three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

SecureSphere has been very stable until recently, due to the addition of new source databases causing performance issues.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

SecureSphere is very scalable.

How are customer service and support?

Imperva's technical support has been good. In the past, it sometimes took a long time to resolve an issue, but more recently, the responsiveness has been very impressive.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Neutral

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Previously, we used Oracle Audit Vault, but its reports were a little complex, and their support was not so impressive.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was straightforward, and the deployment took between one and two weeks.

What about the implementation team?

Our deployment was done in-house.

What was our ROI?

SecureSphere has resulted in us receiving audit exceptions, especially from the final details, which is a big deal to my organization since we have to be compliant.

What other advice do I have?

I would recommend SecureSphere to other users and advise making a dedicated team available to work on the solution and configure the correct set of policies so they can get value for their money. I'd give SecureSphere a rating of eight out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Imperva SecureSphere Database Security
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about Imperva SecureSphere Database Security. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Senior Solutions Architect at eLAAB Limited
Reseller
A comprehensive firewall and data security solution package with superior reporting capability
Pros and Cons
  • "Flexible reporting allows for customization that keeps the admins from having to interact with system automation."
  • "Performance can be slow under heavy loads, but this should be adjusted by scaling."

What is our primary use case?

We generally use Imperva as a database firewall and for activity monitoring. 

The solution has to fit the organization first. Once we know the product is a fit, we support in the creation of reports. We look at the core users (administrators, auditors, accountants, etc.) who need to get information and we look at the responsibility matrix. Our responsibility is the database and we try to implement the total solution for an organization. This means reports are created for the specific needs of, say, IT security administrators, top management, IT guys, etc. This shows each group or individual what they need to know. We try to make it so database administrators do not have to directly interface with the solution by creating report editors and report creators based on the unique assessment of the organization. 

Imperva is a high-end product and it doesn't come cheap. Most government agencies don't use it because of its expense. But those who use it, like it and it's on the wishlist of many organizations.

How has it helped my organization?

The ability to automate reports simplifies what an organization has to do. Even the in-built reports are quite useful. But customization can make the product experience very specific and efficient.

But besides that, clients like to compare industry benchmarks and establish best practices. Report analysis can help with that.

What is most valuable?

The reporting ends up being the most visible feature even though the protection and automated blocking are as valuable. The reporting is very flexible, and users can create any type of reports they want. It gives them insight into the information they need to be effective at what they are responsible for.

What needs improvement?

I think the support needs more improvement than the product. The support we get struggles a bit to provide solutions. They take additional time to respond to support requests.

The core of Imperva can sometimes be very slow. This mostly happens when you turn on many alerts, if a lot of people log-in, or if you turn on auditing. It can get noticeably slow. Performance under a heavy load is noticeably reduced.

That could be because of scalability, but most of my major issues have to do with performance. I think it's because they run an Oracle database at the backend. If they allowed the administrators to tune the back end database it might solve the issue. If the backend database is having trouble you have to call support and that takes time. It is not efficient.

Finally, they might consider reducing the licensing fee. It's a bit high compared to the competition. 

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been reselling this product for five years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Imperva is very stable. I think because of the core on which it is built.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The Imperva solution is quite scalable. You can start by adding it to one device and then scale it to the whole organization. 

We've had instances where we added a gateway and the end user didn't notice. It scales fluidly.

How are customer service and technical support?

There are different levels of support that you can contract for and it is supposed to be based on priority. In our region, the level of support — whether you have paid for premium or expanded support — you get the same level of support. There are no options for same day support or one hour support. You may still get a response within an hour no matter what level you pay for. That said, we normally pay for premium support and we have been satisfied with the service when we do that.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Most of the time, the customers I deal with pick products which have a particular reputation. That may lead to their decision to go with Imperva. 

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was straightforward. We normally use Imperva's professional services, so that makes it very easy to deploy. We build on the knowledge gained in previous deployments, which makes it easier still. 

In the deployment, we want to get up as soon as possible. We know that for a typical deployment that it is usually two weeks. 

What about the implementation team?

We use Imperva's professional services for most of our deployments, but we work through a distributor data group. The services are always really good. They know the company, they know the market, they know the region where we operate from, and they know the language and the culture. The knowledge of the local environment makes everything easier in completing a proper implementation.

What was our ROI?

We don't do actual studies on return on investment. The key thing is for the product to do its job. The value of good security is practically limitless and it would be hard to define in hard dollar value.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Licenses are yearly. We normally try to negotiate a perpetual license but separate annual support and maintenance.

The pricing over-all depends on the entry level. For example, if support and maintenance are about $20,000 - $25,000, the initial cost can be five times more. It is less expensive for the company to maintain the client than to make the deployment.

There are some additional costs for add-ons and scaling.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Normally, in this region, clients look at McAfee and Oracle security solutions first because of recognition. Our suggestions are normally to compare Imperva and Oracle. Clients like the reputation of Oracle because it has a large footprint and is proven in areas like databases and applications. Sometimes clients try to build database security strictly around Oracle Technology without considering other options. They are often surprised what Imperva has to offer as the name is less familiar.

What other advice do I have?

Imperva is a good product if you look at its core functionality and the way it's built. It's a newer product and very consistent. Oracle has been around a long time and may suffer from that legacy a little. If clients want a product which covers all database management systems, then Imperva can work out of the box. Ideally, you can deploy within a day or two of signing a contract. Implementation time with Imperva is much shorter than with Oracle. 

I think I would rate Imperva a nine out of ten, despite the occasional performance issues. It delivers on the core functionality. If it's running well you are assured you will get the value out of it in terms of the security assurance. 

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Reseller.
PeerSpot user
Senior IT Security Specialist at National Water Company
Real User
Assesses the vulnerability of the database while it is running
Pros and Cons
  • "A solution which does what other name brand products do for a lower cost."
  • "The interface is not user-friendly."

What is our primary use case?

The primary use for our company is to enable the auditing on the DB level. The main target is to track the activities happening and by whom on critical tables. Based on that requirement, we purchased this database auditing solution because it was specific to Oracle for auditing purposes.

How has it helped my organization?

It addresses our needs and our clients' needs for Oracle DB reporting.

What is most valuable?

The features which are most valuable are from the security perspective. We do not have other specific tools for vulnerability assessment. The package allows user activity monitoring. The second thing is for assessing the vulnerability of the database while it is running. 

What needs improvement?

The GUI needs to be improved and made more user-friendly. This solution is a little complicated compared with other solutions for database auditing because of the GUI interface. It will be much more competitive if the interface meets the standards of the other vendors in the market.

For example, the price of the IBM Guardium is very high, but it's user-friendly. On the other hand, the Imperva GUI is complicated. It is harder for us to generate reports. That's why we face some hurdles in operations.

For security, the main point is to report on any violation of compliance. The administrator is required to generate reports. The GUI is set by the operator and not the admin of the device. Every time they need to make changes, it requires a lot of configuration to generate a new report. For any urgent report, the administrator has to be involved. It should not be necessary.

The agent should be installed at the box itself instead of going on the bridging system and doing the installation. Whenever any dependency is required, the activity becomes harder. If the dependency is not required then the activity can be handled from the box itself. It should be very easy to execute the administration and operations of the device. Comparing to Cisco devices, which are very user-friendly, other product manufacturers can take a lesson and make an effort to make the operational and administrative tasks easy.

It should be possible to execute by the team without writing custom lock sources. 

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using this solution for about seven months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Everything is working fine, so it is stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

As we are able to change our licensing to expand resources and features, it is scalable. We have not yet actually implemented the scalability.

How are customer service and technical support?

Till now we have not had any open cases with the technical support, so I cannot comment on that.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Before Imperva, we used IBM Guardium. We switched because of the price. With IBM Guardium we were charged for features we never needed to use. We were using it only for auditing purposes. That is the same thing we are using Imperva for. As we did not have any need for the other features in Guardium we were paying extra for nothing. Some of the higher level features we now use in Imperva were available in Guardium, but we didn't use them at that time. 

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was straightforward. At first, we were unable to find the application user tracking and our main target was to track specific user privileges, activity and who was making changes inside the database from the console. It was a minor setback.

There are two types of deployment. The first one is for the solution to integrate the database which took about three days. For the usage, identifying the queries and creating rules, it took longer. The whole was complete within 15 days or 20 days, I think.

We have three operators and two administrators. The administrator role is to make the policies, install the agent, do the integration with the gateway and enable the auditing on the specific tables and the specific columns.

The operator generates reports on users and activity based on the areas we need to monitor. If a user is doing any activity outside of the normal time, the operator's responsibility is to report users to the DVR admin and the security feed.

One guy was enough for the deployment. We have only integrated one database, so in our environment is simple.

Another thing I want to highlight is that you can adjust the permissions from anywhere.

What about the implementation team?

The deployment was done by the Imperva partner.

What was our ROI?

The immediate return is that we are saving money by having a lower cost for the same functionality. The new solution has satisfied management. I couldn't tell you the exact return. The only real additional cost was retraining staff. That was minimal.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I don't know the exact prices because that is a function of accounting, but I know service is contracted on a yearly basis. We purchased the minimal license for Imperva initially even though we have a lot of databases, but the license covered our needs. The company has recommended increasing the licensing. 

There are additional costs depending on the features. For example, if we want to prevent something on the DV level we can't because we didn't purchase that license. If we want it, we can add it. Our main goal right now is to enhance the license for the TPS license (transaction process system). It is easy to enhance functionality by adding other features licenses.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We did a comparison between Imperva and IBM Guardium before making the switch. The comparison was based on two things: auditing the databases and monitoring user privileges. These two features were offered by both solutions, so we were just left to evaluate based on the difference in prices. 

What other advice do I have?

I would give Imperva an eight out of ten as a solution. It meets our requirements equally to what we got from IBM Guardium which we went with based on little more than their name.

In a later review, we considered Imperva and realized that both products had almost the same features. If the same functionality is provided by both, it is hard to justify the more expensive product. Now we will save the extra money.

At that time, the administrator was not comfortable with the change to Imperva but we provided official training from Imperva. He had experience with other solutions for database auditing systems, so he was able to make the adjustment.

We are working with the minimal license so currently, the resources are lower compared to our IBM Guardium license. Even with a shortage of resources, everything is equal to the IBM Guadium solution and we can correct that resource shortage while still saving money.

The main thing is defining the actual requirements. If a solution complies with the requirements there's no need to spend extra money for the brand names.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Network Engineer at CBN
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
Has a robust recording system and does a good job monitoring events
Pros and Cons
  • "Ability to send event monitoring and administrative activities."
  • "There is sometimes lost communication and it can take a lot of troubleshooting to solve."

What is our primary use case?

We use this product to monitor database administrator events and activities on all services. We also use it for preventive measures. Some sensitive queries can be blocked in line before transactions occur.

What is most valuable?

It's great that we're able to send light event monitoring and administrative activities. SecureSephere has a robust recording system.

What needs improvement?

We have a lot of lost communication between the clients and the management server. This is a client-on-server solution and sometimes the agent stops communicating and it can take a lot of troubleshooting to solve the issue. It would also be helpful if they'd improve artificial intelligence. 

For how long have I used the solution?

We've been using this solution for six years. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability is pretty good. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The scalability is good. 

How are customer service and support?

The customer support is not very good. 

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I don't recall the name of the previous solution but we switched to Imperva because it was less complex. 

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was reasonably straightforward. The deployment took about three months and we had some external assistance. 

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

This is an expensive solution. We pay an additional amount for support. 

What other advice do I have?

Staff need training prior to using this product. 

I rate this solution nine out of 10.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Project Manager at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Policies and alerts allow us to detect malicious activity in critical databases
Pros and Cons
  • "The tool happens to be very intelligent when it comes to processing policies and sounding alerts. It allows us to implement policies and measure actions against them, raising alerts accordingly."
  • "The only challenge I see is that SecureSphere is deployed on servers or databases which are held on physical infrastructure. However, there are databases which are hosted on cloud platforms and Imperva has a separate tool altogether for that, not SecureSphere."

What is our primary use case?

The primary use case is specific to database security through log auditing, to identify the actions performed by various users. That gets logged. Then policies are used to see whether any action performed by a database user is below a threshold or above a threshold; whether there should there be an alert because of it.

It is used by specific teams within our organization to monitor activity, to see whether there is any malicious activity or a user who's not supposed to be performing a certain action.

How has it helped my organization?

It helps us look into who's doing what, particularly on databases related to critical applications. That's the way we see it as useful. We've been using it for four or five years now, and it has been bringing in the value that we expected it to.

What is most valuable?

The tool happens to be very intelligent when it comes to processing policies and sounding alerts. It allows us to implement policies and measure actions against them, raising alerts accordingly. That is the best feature.

What needs improvement?

Comparing it with other products in the market, we definitely see that Imperva SecureSphere is head-to-head with the likes of McAfee, IBM Guardium, and others. It's definitely good. The only challenge I see is that SecureSphere is deployed on servers or databases which are held on physical infrastructure. However, there are databases which are hosted on cloud platforms and Imperva has a separate tool altogether for that, not SecureSphere. If an organization is monitoring databases which are on physical as well as virtual infrastructure, running two different tools can become a problem. If that could be merged together it would be an improvement.

Having read about Imperva, I couldn't get much detail as to what their roadmap is for the future, whether they would want to merge them or not. But as a customer, if I can have one tool for various landscapes, like the databases hosted on a physical landscape as well as the virtual ones, that makes it a lot easier.

For how long have I used the solution?

One to three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability has been good. In our case, we've been using it through one of our suppliers so we don't directly manage it. It's our supplier who manages it for us. The supplier happens to manage the infrastructure on which the database application or databases are hosted as well.

We don't deal with it but, getting the reports that we have been getting from our supplier, it looks pretty good as far as stability is concerned. We haven't experienced many issues. Even if there were any, it would be our supplier's responsibility to make sure that they got resolved very quickly, so they rarely come to our notice.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

When it comes to scalability, as I noted, there are two different tools, one for physical infrastructure and another for virtual infrastructure.

If I want to scale it up from a physical to a virtual platform, that's certainly not a feature at this point of time. That can be a drawback. You have to look for a separate tool from the same vendor because you already have an existing tool from that vendor which is doing well. And you cannot have tools from two different vendors running on two different platforms.

How are customer service and technical support?

We have not used technical support. Our supplier manages the tool, so we don't get in touch with Imperva if there are any issues. Our supplier does that for us.

What other advice do I have?

My advice is to go to IT CentralStation and download the report on database security tools.

In general, it's all about the policies that you put into the tool to get the output. The tool itself is pretty smart. As someone who is designing the policies or the outputs or the queries, it is like putting a query into a SQL database to get the results. The better or more optimized the query is, the better output you will receive, and so it goes with this solution.

When selecting a vendor, pricing, of course, is the most important thing to look at. Then, you look at the scalability options, at how good the tool is, that it suffices your functionality requirements, and that it provides interoperability.

I rate Imperva at eight out of ten across the various areas that I just mentioned, be it interoperability, scalability, cost, or ease of installation and setup. Measuring it on each of these aspects is how I came up with my rating.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Core Banking Application Support at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Good granular auditing, but have had issues with the WAF and do not find it user friendly
Pros and Cons
  • "Currently, we have audit features for auditing databases, for example, granular auditing, which we really enjoy. We've been using it to check what users do."
  • "The solution is expensive."

What is our primary use case?

We primarily use the solution for monitoring database activities.

What is most valuable?

Currently, we have audit features for auditing databases, for example, granular auditing, which we really enjoy. We've been using it to check what users do. 

Apart from the WAF, which we've had issues with, every other feature we've been able to use very well. We use it for scanning databases, which is perfect. We need to run vulnerabilities counts as well, and this solution is great for that.

What needs improvement?

The feature right now that we have not been able to use successfully is the firewall aspect, the WAF.

In terms of the WAF, we tried their blocking functionality at some point, and our entire company came to a halt due to the fact that it was blocking even database connections. It was hanging our databases. Until now, we've not been able to fully use their database blocking functionality very well. That is the only aspect that I wish could be improved tomorrow.

The entire system is not user-friendly for me, and definitely not as user-friendly as Oracle Vault. It should be more user-friendly, to make it much more competitive in the space. 

The technical support is not offered by the company itself. Rather, you can only get technical support via partners. It isn't that good and because of this, we want to leave the product.

The solution is expensive.

If we can look at a system that can do 360 annual. There is an app call bridge that is something they've introduced, however, we don't have that yet. I don't know if that is able to do application monitoring as well, but I wish they had a feature that could do both the database and application monitoring.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using the solution for about four to five years now.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability is okay. I don't recall any kind of bug or glitch. It doesn't freeze or crash. Aside from issues with WAF, it's good.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The scalability is fine for our purposes. We are able to modify the product, and we are able to do things to suit what we need, so it's okay for us. If I were to rate them out of ten on scalability, I'd give them a six.

How are customer service and technical support?

One of the reasons we want to leave this solution is the fact that we don't have any technical support whatsoever. If there was some on offer, it might convince us to stay. Technical support is typically handled by partners, and they do not do a good job. We've been trying to reach the parent company directly because we are unsatisfied with the level of service we've received and we've had no luck. Therefore, we'll probably leave the service altogether.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The solution is pretty pricey. It's not the least expensive option. An organization will have to ensure they have the budget to cover the cost or having the product. I'd say that the amount of money they charge is unreasonable sometimes. If I were to rate them out of ten on pricing, I would give them a one.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We're currently looking to move away from Imperva. We're considering Audit Vault.

What other advice do I have?

The solution is okay, however, there is a lot to be improved upon. For that reason, I'd rate them five out of ten overall.

It's not a bad tool. It's a good tool. I tend to recommend it to others, however, if you're a small company, it may not make sense due to the fact that it is quite expensive.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: partner
PeerSpot user
it_user548754 - PeerSpot reviewer
L3 Application Support Analyst at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
I believe the most valuable feature is the GUI. If load is big and there are advanced filtering rules in place, gateways or MX can crash.

What is most valuable?

I believe the most valuable feature is the GUI. It is still very much oversized for the job it does, but in comparison to other alternatives, it is still the best at the moment.

How has it helped my organization?

Before SecureSphere was used, the native auditing tools were used, and now there is a segregation of duties when managing audit data from DBAs and DBS teams. It is a much more secure way to have audit data from databases and to monitor actions of privileged accounts.

What needs improvement?

All areas of this product have room for improvement. There are a lot of things that can be improved if you want this to run in a corporate environment with thousands of database servers. If your database server count is low, it is a fine solution for you.

Lack of centralized integration when supporting/configuring appliances (SOM has some, but not all configuration/reporting/management functions, but you can’t do a lot of things from one management appliance (SOM) and have to go to separate MX when you want to configure something). As well you can’t upgrade appliances via Update module (you can only do so with agent and that functionality has much room for improvement as the update GUI is not well designed, some functions do not work and event/alert notifications there are mostly useless). So this and some other things make management and support of very large SecureSphere infrastructure sometimes painful.

For how long have I used the solution?

I’ve been using SecureSphere for over three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It depends on the load of gateways/MXs. If load is big and there are advanced filtering rules in place, gateways or MX can crash or perform slowly.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The SOM does not have all the functionality yet to manage all MXs centrally and, if you have a very large infrastructure, it is not so easy to manage it, as it requires you to apply updates or new configurations directly to agents or MXs 1 by 1.

How are customer service and technical support?

The support team responds promptly but sometimes it seems that, in more complex cases, they just try to stall for time for R&D to look at it and that they don’t know why some problems are happening.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Before, we were using native database auditing tools. Regulators have pointed out that DBAs are managing auditing tools themselves, which is not a good practice. Usage of SecureSphere and forming a new team responsible only for management of this tool was suggested.

How was the initial setup?

Setup was complex. We had to deploy hundreds of gateway appliances to gather audit data and deploy thousands of agents to different OSs. This was not an easy task, as there were no simple solutions to do that. There were also challenges to configuring auditing rules and monitoring rules to work with all kinds of databases and different kind of requirements relating to them.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I don’t know anything about pricing and licensing.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I believe an IBM solution was considered, but it was much too expensive and didn’t provide as many features.

What other advice do I have?

Use the newest version (at the moment I think it is 11.5) and pay extra for staff training and additional consultation on how to set up rules, etc.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Imperva SecureSphere Database Security Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: March 2024
Product Categories
Database Security
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Imperva SecureSphere Database Security Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.