Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy Reviews

I use Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy in my company for BNB Chain.

The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is a very simple solution. Google Cloud Platform Identity-Aware Proxy is cheaper than AWS and allows users to keep tabs on factors like location and timelines.

I think the product is easy to use on any server. If I want to use the product or open it on other systems, I think it's very easy.

The UI of the solution is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required. The product needs to be made user-friendly.

I have been using Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy for two or three years.

It is a very stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

It is a scalable solution.

Around three people in my company, consisting of the cloud manager and cloud engineer, use the product to set up a website.

I think that the product's initial setup phase was straightforward.

Not many steps are required to take care of the deployment phase of the product. In a few steps, one can finish the deployment of the product.

Two engineers are required to take care of the deployment and maintenance processes of the product.

The solution can be deployed in ten minutes.

The solution can be deployed by myself in my company.

I wouldn't recommend the product to other users.

I rate the overall tool a ten out of ten.

We use the product to migrate the data from the center to the cloud.

The platform’s most valuable features include storage, machine, and cloud functionality.

The product’s migration process could be easier to understand.

We have been using Google Cloud Platform Cloud for two to three years.

The platform has good stability.

It is a scalable product. Yet, the complexity depends on the amount of data and workload.

Google has good technical support services.

The initial setup process is straightforward.

I rate Google Cloud Platform Cloud an eight out of ten.

Our use case is to plug platforms, especially applications that are 
based on website micro services such as containers. 

From our perspective this is a good solution that functions well and has good features. 

We are based in France and it's difficult to find people with sufficient training to assist us. I'd like to see companies with the right level of expertise to help my customers to move their projects from the traditional information system or infrastructures on premise to cloud but it's very difficult to find that here. Google is not well supported in France. 

The initial setup was not so easy. The average deployment time is between one and two years. It requires an initial feasibility study to understand the scope. Once that's established you need to find the path to help set up the right security parameters. The migration is done through scripting and codes. The deployment requires project managers and engineers.

I recommend this solution but it's important to find the right partner and be sure you have a suitable use case. I rate this solution eight out of 10. 

Google Cloud Platform's Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy manages our organization's entire user database across the Middle East region for PwC. In addition, the solution is used to run virtual environments and storage solutions. It also serves our needs for AI or any other applications, including using Apps Script.

The solution's speed, processing power, and user functionality are some of its most valuable features.

I think the solution has some issues in document accessing and accessing of some data at times when you have automated scripts. So, maybe that could be made better in the solution. Sometimes, it just fails to get some documents, and then it resumes normally. Google should work to enhance the overall features of the solution.

I have experience with Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy for four and a half years. Also, I am using the latest version of the solution.

The solution offers medium to high stability to its users.

Though I never used the solution from a scalability standpoint, I assume that its scalability would be fine.

I never contacted the solution's technical support team because our organization has an internal IT department.

I previously used Azure. However, my company never used Azure.

The solution's initial setup process was fine. I assume that one person is required for the deployment process of the solution.

I would recommend the solution to those planning to use it in the future. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

This is a service. We use it for our business, for operations. 

This can be deployed easily. 

The solution is stable. It's reliable. 

There is good documentation available. There is a lot of information available online to help new users. 

It is hard to find expertise, ad most people deal with AWS. 

The solution is quite expensive. 

We'd like the solution to continue to make security features more robust. We need to protect against data leaks and also need to protect customer information. 

We've been using the solution for less than a year now. We're a new company.

This is a stable, reliable product. It does not have bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

We're a new company. This solution hasn't been used for too long, and we haven't really launched anything yet. Right now, it is still just internally dealt with. Likely less than 100 people deal with it right now. 

The support could be better. There needs to be more knowledgeable. It could be that there aren't enough people with a good knowledge base in our country. Most people are comfortable with AWS, and not necessarily with GCP. However, I don't typically deal with technical support. 

We also use AWS, which is what most companies use. 

The solution is very easy to set up and deploy. It's not a complex process. We can easily deploy applications, APIs, et cetera. However, I did not handle the initial setup myself and therefore cannot speak from firsthand experience. 

We do find it to be more expensive than AWS. 

I'm not sure what version of the solution we're using. 

I'd recommend the solution to others. There's not a problem with deploying it. The business decision comes more about the deployment and support costs and if that makes sense to everyone in the company. It's higher than AWS, which is something that needs to be considered, especially since most people are more familiar with AWS. 

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. It's well documented and does have available support. 

We are a customer and end-user. 

The most valuable features of Google Cloud Platform are the Kubernetes engine, CI/CD, and BigQuery. 

Apigee is a good feature because we analyzed and changed the computer-associated AP to Apigee. We compared the features and created the clusters to change the solution to Apigee. It's a good option on the Google Cloud Platform. And I like BigQuery, which is a fantastic database on the SaaS model. The hard part is creating the pack because our applications are in Azure Data Proxy, Data Fabric, and Data Factory. Our team used these tools in Azure, but in the future, they will transition to GCP.

I've been using Google Cloud Platform for one year.

Google support is outstanding. It's effortless to contact Google engineers, who are all Brazilians. The work is well explained, and they participate in our technical meetings. 

I think the price of Google Cloud Platform is reasonable. However, Microsoft is the most cost-effective solution for us because of Azure's integration. And we already have licenses for Windows Server and the databases, so the price is attractive. And the price of AWS is higher, but we have only two big applications on the AWS. Still, I like Google so much, and my company thinks GCP is the best way to handle our workloads.

I rate Google Cloud Platform nine out of 10. I like the GCP so much because it's flexible. We have tools for similar tech drivers, and we can connect them in the other clouds, where I use the Anthos platform. I created an Anthos platform for similar tech drivers to administer all of the different cloud solutions on the same platform. So, for example, I can put the comments on Cloud Shell and create a resource in the other clouds.

The solution should have better integration. 

The solution is stable. 

The solution is scalable.

The technical support is up to par. 

As with AWS, the solution is easy to install. 

50 or 60 days are needed for the deployment. 

Around three or four people are needed for the deployment and maintenance. 

The customer purchases an annually sponsored license. 

We have a maximum of around 20 customers making use of the solution. 

We support Azure, AWS and Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy, depending on the customer's architecture. 

For the most part, I would not recommend the solution to others, as our expertise is more with AWS and Azure.

I rate Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy as an eight out of ten. 

I work in a retail company. We have a physical data center where we use IBM servers. We want to get rid of them because every time we have a peak season, we have to add the infrastructure and then remove it when it is not the peak time. This process of adding the servers, taking notes, and bringing them down requires a lot of operational effort. There is a lot of manual intervention for adding the resources and configuring the servers, which is a lot of work for the company. That's why we are migrating all our applications. 

Google Cloud will help us in getting the additional assistance just by clicking a button. We basically want to automate instead of doing manual interventions. It is an organizational initiative to move to Google Cloud. At least five to ten teams are involved based on each application and around a hundred people are involved.

It is totally awesome in terms of scalability. Its scalability was the main reason for moving to Google Cloud. It also comes with a lot of features. We are satisfied with the features it has.

We have some challenges related to purging the data. We get a lot of data on a daily basis that has to be refreshed on the site, but we are seeing some challenges with that.

They can also include some third-party integration. We have one Akamai dependency. If they can come up with some API to talk to Akamai, it would be good.

I have been using this solution for one a half years. 

It is very stable.

Its scalability is really good.

Their technical support is good. 

The initial setup is straightforward. 

We get support from Google. There are some Google engineers who visit us on-site, and based on our problem statement, they are able to suggest different approaches and solutions.

Its price is good. For each server, we are saving $300 a month. We have at least thousands of servers. It is a huge cost reduction for us.

I would rate Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy an eight out of ten.