Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy Reviews

The product works as a total cloud solution in terms of Wi-Fi services.

The platform is user-friendly.

It is a stable platform.

The product is expensive. Its price needs improvement.

We have been using Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy for two years. At present, we use the latest version.

I rate the product's stability a nine out of ten.

We have ten Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy users in our organization. The usage depends on specific vendor requirements. It is a scalable product. I rate its scalability a ten out of ten.

We don't have to contact the technical support team as the product's uptime is 99.99%.

The initial setup is easy. It takes two hours to complete the process. It includes cloud authentication, software installation, and IP network configuration. We have a team of five technical executives to work on deployment. It has low-cost maintenance.

I can implement the product myself.

Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is expensive. However, it is inexpensive compared to on-premise deployment. Also, limited storage for primary usage is free of cost.

I recommend Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy and rate it a nine out of ten.

I use the solution as a backup for my documents and files.

The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is easy to use.

I don't know what can be improved since I am not a high-level professional. However, I am satisfied since I use it as a backup for my files.

It is an expensive solution, so I would like its price to be improved.

I have been using Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy for a year.

It is a very stable tool. I think that its stability is good.

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

I don't think that it is a scalable tool. 

The solution has 30 users in my company. 

My company has no plans to increase the solution's usage.

Three people are needed from management, engineering, and finance for the deployments and maintenance.

I have seen an ROI using the solution. Also, it is too early for me to speak about it.

We need to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs. It is an expensive and premium solution.

According to my needs, I think that the solution is okay for me now.

I would recommend the solution to my colleagues and friends planning to use it. Speaking on whether I would recommend it to others, I would consider that on a scale of one to ten, I would rate it a seven.

Overall, I rate the solution a six out of ten.

There are so many things I like about this solution. It's hard to name just one, but I particularly love its user interface. 

Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy has effectively gathered all the necessary elements there. You can easily navigate between projects and manage logs. The navigation panel allows you to switch between different services or centers, helping you figure out the available logs and configure them. 

UI representation is the aspect I like the most about GCP, even more than Azure or AWS.

There are still many aspects I need to explore. However, there is room for improvement in terms of stability. Sometimes we face uncertainty when our internet connection gets disconnected. It becomes challenging to determine whether it's an issue with our internet or if the GCP SDP has crashed. We encounter such errors, but it's difficult to understand the cause. That's why I it is room for improvement, according to me.

In future releases, I would like to see a free version available for students and for those logging in as intermediates or beginners. 

For one of my projects that required deployment and CI/CD, we utilized GCP. It was mainly a DevOps-oriented task unrelated to my development work.

It was a stable solution. I would rate the stability a nine out of ten. 

It was a scalable solution. I would rate the scalability a nine out of ten. 

The initial setup is okay. 

There are a few things that are available for students' free tier. However, for students, the entire platform should ideally be free. 

And it's not just limited to students; even some professionals who need to learn GCP, AWS, or Azure should have free access as partners. 

However, I do understand that there should be charges when professionals create their accounts under the professional category. But for those logging in as intermediates or beginners, it should be available for free. It would be a valuable addition.

Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten. 

I use the solution for Google Home. All my switches are connected to Google Home, allowing me to control everything online.

The most valuable feature of the solution is the ease with which one can use it.

The stability regarding voice commands in the solution has certain shortcomings that need improvement.

I have been using the solution for nearly fifteen years. I use the solution's latest version.

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

It is a scalable solution.

In my company, there are three people who use the product.

Currently, my company does not plan to increase the usage of the solution.

The initial setup of the solution is straightforward.

The solution can be deployed in less than 30 minutes.

You just need to connect everything to an application named Google Home via Wi-Fi, with some Wi-Fi routers in place to increase the strength of the signals to all the rooms during the solution's deployment phase.

The solution's installation phase can be carried out with the help of an in-house team or person from our company.

I have not experienced a return or investment from the use of the solution.

The monthly payments made towards the licensing cost of the solution are not expensive.

During the evaluation phase, I came across a product named Amazon Alexa. I chose Google Cloud Platform over Amazon Alexa since I use a lot of Google products, like Google Chromecast and a few others. I use a Google Pixel Phone, so I thought I would stick with products from Google.

I don't require any technical assistance with the maintenance part of the solution since I am able to do it by myself.

Google is very user-friendly and easy to use, but one should make sure that one doesn't keep everything open to track one's activities. I would prefer the tracking part of the solution to be switched off or disabled. I disable all the features in the solution that helps Google to track my activities.

I rate the overall solution a nine out of ten.

For Google Cloud Platform (GCP), we use it as our infrastructure. We host our infrastructures and create our machines, services and automation pipelines. For Google Cloud Identity, we use it as an identity portal for all of our applications. In addition, the internal application for the tools is used for monitoring the product.

The Cloud Identity in GCP is very good and reliable. It can be published fast. Also, Google Cloud Identity allows you to create groups and give access by group instead of by user. It allows you to create different access policies for every component of new infrastructure, and from a security perspective, this is good.

The Google Cloud UI has a lot of bugs, and they are working on enhancing it. There are a lot of things that need to be enhanced. For example, sometimes, the snapshot portal makes you have a schedule to create multiple snapshots when you have a huge infrastructure hosted on Google Cloud. Sometimes the browser or the UI hangs when looking for a specific snapshot. Also, Google Cloud support responds very quickly, but the UI still needs to have more enhancements related to the performance.

The integration of the solution for patching, updating, and installing the updates could be better. For example, they have a solution called "always patching," which needs to be enhanced. It is not purely a SaaS solution. It should be mostly platform as a solution, not software.

We have been using this solution for more than two years.

It is a stable solution. However, it would be more stable if Google cared more about the UI.

It is a scalable solution. Most of the teams in our company use this solution. The number of people needed for deployment and maintenance depends on whether it is a small or medium company solution. Only one person is needed for a small environment, while two or three are required for a medium environment. The team that supports the solution comprises network and security people. We plan to increase our usage of the solution as our customer base increases.

The technical support is good, and they are very responsive. I rate the technical support an eight out of ten.

I personally have used Azure and AWS in the past.

The initial setup was easy, and it was just plug-and-play. If you have a good understanding of infrastructure, this solution is perfect. It allows us to build an entire infrastructure for a startup or medium company in one hour. To do this, we need to try the script with the machines we need. Next, we need to define the CPU, memory and application we want to install on the machine. Then we can click and run the playbook or the tier forms script and go back after hours. By then, everything has been created, and we'll have an infrastructure that can handle a small startup.

The deployment depends on the complexity. If it is a small deployment, it might take less time, but a larger deployment will take more. For example, if we want to use a machine on GCP, it might take about two to three minutes, but if we have a huge deployment for multiple machines with multiple loop balances, records, and firewall rules, it might take 40 minutes to one hour. We completed the deployment in-house.

I rate this solution an eight out of ten. Regarding advice, I would recommend planning for everything and keeping it simple. It is also important to monitor consumption on the Google Cloud to ensure you are not paying for something you are not using.

Most cloud providers have the same features, but the main difference between them is the solution's availability and cost. Most of the features are only utilized at 30% or 50%.

We use the solution for data engineering, data preparation, and AI.

The tool is really good, especially for ease of implementation and having many options. We can build complex data pipelines and AI models, like web-based AI assistants or chatbots.

Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy should improve stability. 

I rate the tool's stability a nine out of ten. 

My company has 10-15 users. 

Support is good, and there is lots of material available online. We usually don't need to call someone, but if we do, it's okay.

straightforward to set up and easy to learn. There are lots of training materials and hands-on labs, making it easy to onboard new team members. Our engineers really like the platform.

There are different pricing plans depending on data volumes and services, but it's comparable to other providers. The value and benefits depend on what we're developing and the specific use case.

I rate Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy an eight out of ten. I'd recommend it. We use both Azure and GCP, and they're both really good. It depends on client preference.

I use Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy in my company for BNB Chain.

The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is a very simple solution. Google Cloud Platform Identity-Aware Proxy is cheaper than AWS and allows users to keep tabs on factors like location and timelines.

I think the product is easy to use on any server. If I want to use the product or open it on other systems, I think it's very easy.

The UI of the solution is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required. The product needs to be made user-friendly.

I have been using Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy for two or three years.

It is a very stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

It is a scalable solution.

Around three people in my company, consisting of the cloud manager and cloud engineer, use the product to set up a website.

I think that the product's initial setup phase was straightforward.

Not many steps are required to take care of the deployment phase of the product. In a few steps, one can finish the deployment of the product.

Two engineers are required to take care of the deployment and maintenance processes of the product.

The solution can be deployed in ten minutes.

The solution can be deployed by myself in my company.

I wouldn't recommend the product to other users.

I rate the overall tool a ten out of ten.

We use the product to migrate the data from the center to the cloud.

The platform’s most valuable features include storage, machine, and cloud functionality.

The product’s migration process could be easier to understand.

We have been using Google Cloud Platform Cloud for two to three years.

The platform has good stability.

It is a scalable product. Yet, the complexity depends on the amount of data and workload.

Google has good technical support services.

The initial setup process is straightforward.

I rate Google Cloud Platform Cloud an eight out of ten.