Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy Reviews

The solution can be used for many things. I was using it to host my application.

Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is a scalable solution. Although it's not really user-friendly, once you learn about it and understand it, it's a nice platform to use.

Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy could be more user-friendly and less expensive.

I have been using Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy for four to five years.

I rate Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy an eight out of ten for stability.

Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is a scalable solution.

It's not easy to talk to someone from the solution's technical support team.

The solution's initial setup is not straightforward, and it needs a little bit of learning.

It took us a little while to deploy the solution. I did a lot of manual processes, but it has automated processes for deployment.

Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is quite an expensive solution.

I have used the old version, and currently, I am using the latest version of the solution.

Two people from the DevOps infrastructure support and application support team are using the solution for a small project.

We have to understand the solution better. We have to do a bit of learning and development before we use the solution.

Overall, I rate Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy an eight out of ten.

There are so many things I like about this solution. It's hard to name just one, but I particularly love its user interface. 

Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy has effectively gathered all the necessary elements there. You can easily navigate between projects and manage logs. The navigation panel allows you to switch between different services or centers, helping you figure out the available logs and configure them. 

UI representation is the aspect I like the most about GCP, even more than Azure or AWS.

There are still many aspects I need to explore. However, there is room for improvement in terms of stability. Sometimes we face uncertainty when our internet connection gets disconnected. It becomes challenging to determine whether it's an issue with our internet or if the GCP SDP has crashed. We encounter such errors, but it's difficult to understand the cause. That's why I it is room for improvement, according to me.

In future releases, I would like to see a free version available for students and for those logging in as intermediates or beginners. 

For one of my projects that required deployment and CI/CD, we utilized GCP. It was mainly a DevOps-oriented task unrelated to my development work.

It was a stable solution. I would rate the stability a nine out of ten. 

It was a scalable solution. I would rate the scalability a nine out of ten. 

The initial setup is okay. 

There are a few things that are available for students' free tier. However, for students, the entire platform should ideally be free. 

And it's not just limited to students; even some professionals who need to learn GCP, AWS, or Azure should have free access as partners. 

However, I do understand that there should be charges when professionals create their accounts under the professional category. But for those logging in as intermediates or beginners, it should be available for free. It would be a valuable addition.

Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten. 

Delivery Hero primarily uses GCP as the cloud provider. All of our services are deployed on GCP and we utilize GCP's Pub/Sub queues for messaging.

GCP has been instrumental in providing all the necessary cloud resources for my company. It serves as the foundation for all our cloud deployments. It has helped me with managing the infrastructure for our cloud services.

I find the GCS Portal to be particularly valuable. It is more user-friendly and easier to navigate compared to other cloud providers, such as AWS. I particularly appreciate the user interface of GCS.

There is room for improvement in the tools and features available on the GCP. In particular, the managed databases and queues could be improved, and it would be beneficial to have more offerings in areas such as data science and data warehousing. Additionally, GCP could benefit from offering similar tools to those offered by its competitors, such as Amazon AWS's Redshift.

I have been using the Google Cloud Platform(GCP) for three months.

I rate the stability of GCP a seven out of ten.

We have approximately 1,500 people using the solution in my company. We have plans to increase our usage of the solution.

GCP is highly scalable.

I rate GCP a ten out of ten.

I rate the support from GCP an eight out of ten.

Positive

I have previously used Amazon AWS.

I have seen an ROI by using GCP.

When comparing the price of GCP to other solutions it provides more value for the money.

I rate the price of GCP a nine out of ten.

The user interface can be further improved, and it would be useful to have more options for tracking and monitoring resources on the GCP. The ability to deep dive into the various features and options would be beneficial.

I rate Google Cloud Platform an eight out of ten.

The solution can be used to share pictures, videos, and documents. We can store other things in MP3 and MP4 formats.

I can use the spreadsheets and save them on the drive. I can share the link with others and update them as needed.

The product is easily available. The solution can be easily integrated with other platforms like Amazon and Microsoft. We can share files and provide interlinks. The solution is easy to install and use. We get almost 15 GB free of cost. It is a good tool. It is safe to use. We can store things securely.

The product must be more user-friendly. It should be provided in other languages, too.

I have been using the solution for almost ten years.

The environment is stable. I can access it quickly. I rate the stability an eight out of ten.

The tool is scalable.

The setup is straightforward. It is easy to do. We just have to create an account.

The product is free.

I have used Microsoft, too. Microsoft Azure is much more difficult to understand. Google is much more user-friendly. With the integration of ChatGPT, Microsoft will give tough competition to Google.

I will recommend the solution to others. It is a great tool. Overall, I rate the product an eight out of ten.

We use it for Gmail.

We don't have any on-premises hardware. It's just cloud. It's good overall. My overall experience is positive. It’s plug-and-play. We do not need to learn anything new to use the product.

The product’s user interface must be more user-friendly and detailed. It’s straightforward, but it could be much more elaborate.

I have been using the solution for approximately three months.

The solution’s stability is excellent. We have had no problems with the stability.

We have been using the product for three months. It scales without any problem. We have 200 users. We need one person to deploy and manage the tool.

We have used Microsoft Exchange on-premises.

We need to use Google Chrome and connect our email and storage. We can do it by ourselves. We arrange a tutorial for every user in our organization. They have learned how to use Google Workspace, Google Sheets, Google Play, and Google Drive. We haven’t had any problems so far.

We get a very good return on investment.

We pay a monthly fee to use the tool. Google Cloud Platform is cheaper than Microsoft Exchange.

I am learning Amazon, Azure, and Google Cloud to change my career from programming to cloud administration. We are using Looker for reporting purposes. We’re still deciding whether it is good or not. Overall, I rate the product a nine out of ten.

We have an Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) solution hosted on the Google Cloud platform and deployed internally. We use the solution to do identity and access management and security updates on that.

Since the solution works with Terraform, it makes Infrastructure as Code (IaC) easier.

The solution is a bit complex and could be made easier to use. The solution should have an easier knowledge base. The solution should have basic-level certifications that encourage people to start using it because its certifications are lengthy.

I have been using Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy for two years.

I rate Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy ten out of ten for stability.

Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is a scalable solution. Around 20 administrators are using the solution in our organization.

The solution's technical support tool could be better because they use third-party vendors instead of Google engineers.

We previously worked with Azure. We switched to Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy because it was blockchain-based.

The solution’s initial setup is pretty straightforward.

Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy was deployed by a vendor for us.

Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is a cloud-based solution, and we are using its latest version.

Overall, I rate Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy an eight out of ten.

I use the solution for the storage of my vital documents, collection of data, analysis of data, presentations, and email. I could create forms and collect data required for different purposes.

Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is an easy-to-use solution. It doesn't need much technical expertise, and a person familiar with operating a PC can use it. You should know programming and how to use code at an advanced level.

The solution's AI integration could be improved.

I have been using Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy for 15 years.

The solution's stability is good.

The solution is easy to scale. Around 25,000 users were using the solution in my previous organization.

The solution's initial setup is not complicated.

The solution's per-user configuration takes a matter of a few minutes. You generate their user credentials, hand them over to the users, and then they can start using it.

The solution's return on investment depends on how the user utilizes it.

Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is an expensive solution. The solution has a per-user-based license. On a scale from one to ten, where ten is expensive and one is cheap, I rate Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy an eight out of ten.

Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is a completely cloud-based solution.

Users should understand for what purpose they are buying the solution. Unless you can fully utilize it, don't choose Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy.

Overall, I rate Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy a nine out of ten.

The product is simple to use. Additionally, it uses fiber optics and some native technologies of Google, such as Kubernetes, which are essential for the network.

They should include case studies to learn about the use cases. It is a bit technical, and figuring out the proper use cases for our business is challenging. We would like to know the exact technical intricacies and its output regarding return on investment.

We have been using Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy for three years.

I rate the product's stability a nine and a half out of ten.

We have 300 Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy users in our organization. It is a scalable platform.

The initial setup is easy. It requires four engineers to execute the process.

The product's costing model needs improvement. There should be flexible pricing options.

I rate Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy a nine out of ten. They should add more information on the business cases.