We performed a comparison between Unifi and webMethods Integration Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The controller makes it easy to control everything from one platform. The management is easy."
"It's easy to manage and support the user, our guests, and our customers if they have a problem."
"It integrates well with various servers."
"The ease of mapping... is the single largest feature. It gives us the ability to craft anything. A lot of single-purpose technologies, like Mirth, are good for healthcare messages, but we use webMethods not only for healthcare messages but for other business-related purposes, like integrations to Salesforce or integrations to Office 365. It's multi-purpose nature is very strong."
"The development is very fast. If you know what you're doing, you can develop something very easily and very fast."
"The Software AG Designer has been great. It's very intuitive."
"Most of the work in our organization can be more easily done using the tool."
"It’s fairly easy to view, move, and mange access across different components. Different component types are categorized and can be viewed in a web based administration console."
"The tool is very powerful and user-friendly."
"When it comes to the user interface, I'm already really used to it. I cannot say anything against it. For me, it's easy to use."
"There are issues with certain Apple devices."
"It's stable, but it depends on the office and location."
"Forced migration from MessageBroker to Universal Messaging requires large scale reimplementation for JMS."
"This product is for larger companies. Compared to TIBCO I think webMethods is better in terms of ease of use and support."
"Large file handling is pretty hard comparatively to other middleware tools."
"One area that needs improvement is the version upgrade process. Many customers I've worked with encounter challenges when transitioning from their current version, such as x or 9, to a newer version. The process is not smooth, and they must shift their entire website."
"The patching of infrastructure is not very smooth and improved authentication should be added in the next feature."
"The certifications and learning resources are not exposed openly enough. For instance, they have a trial version which comes with only a few basic features, and I think that community-wise they need to offer more free or open spaces where developers can feel encouraged to experiment."
"I'd like to see the admin portal for managing the integration server go up a level, to have more capabilities and to be given a more modern web interface."
"webMethods Integration Server needs to add more adapters."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
Unifi is ranked 47th in Data Integration with 2 reviews while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 60 reviews. Unifi is rated 8.0, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Unifi writes "Makes integration and monitoring users very easy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". Unifi is most compared with SSIS, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods.io Integration, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks and Boomi iPaaS. See our Unifi vs. webMethods Integration Server report.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.