SES WAF vs SiteLock comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
United Security Providers Logo
114 views|93 comparisons
SiteLock Logo
434 views|340 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between SES WAF and SiteLock based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF).
To learn more, read our detailed Web Application Firewall (WAF) Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "You can't just stop auto-renew from your billing panel, the way you can with reputable businesses."
  • More SiteLock Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:In addition to Sitelock and Immuniweb, another option to consider for a 24/7 automated vulnerability monitoring tool to protect web applications is Modshield SB Modshield SB is a web application… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    114
    Comparisons
    93
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    434
    Comparisons
    340
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Web Application Firewall (WAF)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: April 2024.
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Sucuri logo
    Compared 34% of the time.
    Cloudflare logo
    Compared 31% of the time.
    AWS WAF logo
    Compared 15% of the time.
    Imperva DDoS logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    Comodo cWatch logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    Learn More
    Overview
    Information Not Available

    Real website security means protection from the inside out as well as the outside in. SiteLock does it all -- daily scanning, automatic malware removal, web app firewall, a global CDN for a blazingly fast website and our support team is here for you 24/7. Our dynamic Trust Seal shows visitors your website is safe, increasing conversions and ROI.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    galaxyguitar.com, robertasinc.com, indiarunning.com, comprarenpr.com, idbasolutions.com, newgrip.com
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Government7%
    Educational Organization6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise54%
    Buyer's Guide
    Web Application Firewall (WAF)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: April 2024.
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    SES WAF is ranked 49th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) while SiteLock is ranked 31st in Web Application Firewall (WAF). SES WAF is rated 0.0, while SiteLock is rated 6.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of SiteLock writes "Not only did its website scanner find my website's security issues, but I was also able to implement a security system to prevent future breaches. ". SES WAF is most compared with Imperva Web Application Firewall, whereas SiteLock is most compared with Sucuri, Cloudflare, AWS WAF, Imperva DDoS and Comodo cWatch.

    See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

    We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.