We performed a comparison between SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] and WebLogic Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure."My primary use case for this solution is to display the process in a graphical representation."
"What I've been seeing as the most valuable characteristics of WebLogic Suite include robustness and scalability. It's a really good solution, and I'm not saying this because my company is a partner of WebLogic Suite. I also like that with the newer versions of the solution, you can deploy WebLogic Suite faster. Oracle also provides excellent technical support."
"Robust solution; console and enterprise management tools are really easy to work."
"It easily connects to other Oracle products and services."
"The most valuable feature is that it provides one place where you can control all of the services."
"The solution is useful for centralizing data."
"The feature that I have found to be the most valuable is the ease of deployment."
"The product is reliable."
"It integrates well with other solutions."
"The odata can be improved. It represents to users flexible process that can manage and monitor their own business process."
"The content search is not easy."
"There are sometimes issues with clusters."
"Sometimes there are issues when we work on a VM because people use it to put all of their reports on it at the same time. Then I have to restart and rebuild the machine."
"The solution needs to share more information in terms of training. There needs to be more documentation involved to help those who are completely new to the product."
"I noticed a few areas for improvement in WebLogic Suite. If you use the pure play higher-availability features, then yes, it can be switched over to the other system from the high-availability point of view, but that comes with a certain price. If you prefer simpler high-availability, that requires manual intervention. I'd also recommend a tuning feature in WebLogic Suite because it's not self-tuning, and this means you need thorough expertise to do the tuning and leverage the best benefit out of it. If Oracle makes WebLogic Suite automated or self-driven, then it becomes a wonderful product, similar to what Oracle did for the Autonomous Database which is self-driven or has an autonomous operating system. If automation is added in the next release of the solution, combined with more affordable pricing, though as a technical person, I know how much goes into having automation as a feature, and it could be difficult to lower the price, but if Oracle can do it, then that would make WebLogic Suite better."
"The restart capability needs to be improved because it takes us 15 minutes to restart any application."
"This solution doesn't have connectors to other external applications."
"The licensing for the solution is pretty expensive. It may be the most expensive solution, if you were to compare it to the competition."
Earn 20 points
SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Infrastructure while WebLogic Suite is ranked 11th in Application Infrastructure with 31 reviews. SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] is rated 6.6, while WebLogic Suite is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] writes "Why you should choose SAP BPM as process management discipline?". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WebLogic Suite writes "Simple setup, reliable, and performs well". SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] is most compared with , whereas WebLogic Suite is most compared with Oracle SOA Suite, Microsoft .NET Framework, Oracle WebCenter, Apache Web Server and NGINX Plus.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.