We performed a comparison between Qualitia Automation Studio and UiPath Test Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools."The best feature of this solution is the fact that it offers scriptless automation. You don't need to know how to code or program to use it."
"The document understanding is good."
"It's useful for automating tasks."
"It's effective at testing whatever automation we've built or making sure the automation we've built is working fine."
"UiPath's most valuable features are reusability and low-code aspects. It works across both desktop and web applications."
"We can generate our own workflow. In our case, it is a report on the PDF file. In the reporting category, we generally verify a couple of things and generate a lot of reports at the end of the day. It provides some useful details about the data captured from the PDF that we can put into an Excel file."
"UiPath's tools are generally designed for business users, so they can be as simple or as complex as needed."
"Test Suite has multiple tools that are fully integrated. It has everything you need to record your test cases, generate your documentation, and integrate synthetic data with your Orchestrator. I like the integrated aspect of it. The biggest advantage of UiPath is that it not only tests but also integrates with all the other services to offer a complete package."
"Our team used to require five to six days to complete the entire release or execution cycle. Now, we're able to complete it within just one or one and a half days."
"The integrations for this solutions could be improved, specifically for Slack."
"They could improve the visualization of the product."
"Our primary application is built on Windows, so we've faced no significant challenges. However, I think mobile automation is one area where the solution still needs some work."
"I'd like the solution to be even more automated."
"The test manager component could be improved."
"The product releases sometimes have issues."
"Orchestrator is not easy to use or understand."
"The reporting could be improved. Often, we need to email a report to higher management, we can directly get the report from there. Also, the error reporting could be better."
"We'd like to see the solution integrate with more code or local frameworks."
Qualitia Automation Studio is ranked 23rd in Test Automation Tools with 5 reviews while UiPath Test Suite is ranked 6th in Test Automation Tools with 17 reviews. Qualitia Automation Studio is rated 8.0, while UiPath Test Suite is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Qualitia Automation Studio writes "Good Tool for Non Technical Users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UiPath Test Suite writes "Can be used by non-developers, and saves us time, but the manual testing needs improvement". Qualitia Automation Studio is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, OpenText UFT One and Selenium HQ, whereas UiPath Test Suite is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, OpenText UFT One, SmartBear TestComplete, Katalon Studio and froglogic Squish.
See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
