We performed a comparison between Katalon Studio and UiPath Test Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Test Automation Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The automation is very fast and you don't need to be overly proficient in coding."
"Whenever I speak to the support team of Katalon Studio, I learn that some new features will be included in the product. It is a scalable product."
"It is a good tool and provides all the essential features for our business requirements."
"The functionality of the data is very good. You can upload and disperse data using the solution."
"I rate Katalon Studio's scalability a four out of five."
"The recording feature of this product is very valuable for our testing purposes."
"I like the feature where you can define a model that represents your website and then reuse the components from the model. It makes creating more test cases easy."
"The most valuable feature of Katalon Studio is the ease of use of the solution."
"It's effective at testing whatever automation we've built or making sure the automation we've built is working fine."
"What I like most about UiPath Test Suite is that it's straightforward, and any user who knows how to use the UiPath Studio can learn how to create a test script in as fast as thirty minutes. There's nothing new you must learn to use UiPath Test Suite because it only has three sections: Given, Then, and When."
"It is a very scalable product."
"Test Suite has multiple tools that are fully integrated. It has everything you need to record your test cases, generate your documentation, and integrate synthetic data with your Orchestrator. I like the integrated aspect of it. The biggest advantage of UiPath is that it not only tests but also integrates with all the other services to offer a complete package."
"The detailed logging is invaluable."
"In terms of integration with other lifecycle tools and applications, UiPath Test Suite works very well because of the basis of RPA, and how RPA and automation can handle different applications and different areas of expertise."
"Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable."
"Our team used to require five to six days to complete the entire release or execution cycle. Now, we're able to complete it within just one or one and a half days."
"I've seen that our clients are not truly aware of the power behind Katalon."
"The tool's maintenance is very difficult since they do not follow call by value or call by reference. Due to this, any change happening is not reflected throughout all the test cases. There are some issues with data parameterization as well."
"One improvement would be if it could support more programming languages such as JavaScript or Python. Right now, it is only on Groovy, which I think is not a too popular language."
"They need to work on documentation to make it more centralized and easier to find what you are looking for."
"We would like to see improved integration with various reporting tools; this would make our testing data more complete."
"We have had some issues when it comes to stability, which is something that needs to be improved."
"We have been seeing some error pop-ups that are difficult to understand why they were triggered."
"The integration process with Jira should be enhanced and facilitated."
"UiPath’s Test Suite manual testing doesn’t work for our organization based on how the QA Analysts do their manual testing and the artifacts that are needed for deployment."
"Storing the test scripts is what needs to improve in the UiPath Test Suite, as it's currently a challenge to some extent. Maintaining the files is a bit challenging, especially when you need to keep those locally."
"Orchestrator is not easy to use or understand."
"UiPath needs to improve its Test Manager feature. Defect management and reporting also need improvement."
"The reporting could be improved. Often, we need to email a report to higher management, we can directly get the report from there. Also, the error reporting could be better."
"UiPath could further enhance its functionality by simplifying the test case creation process within Test Suite."
"We'd like to see the solution integrate with more code or local frameworks."
"They could improve the visualization of the product."
Katalon Studio is ranked 3rd in Test Automation Tools with 41 reviews while UiPath Test Suite is ranked 7th in Test Automation Tools with 17 reviews. Katalon Studio is rated 7.8, while UiPath Test Suite is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Katalon Studio writes "Useful multiple technology platform, scalable, but usability could improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UiPath Test Suite writes "Can be used by non-developers, and saves us time, but the manual testing needs improvement". Katalon Studio is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Postman, OpenText UFT One, Appium and Testim, whereas UiPath Test Suite is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, OpenText UFT One, SmartBear TestComplete, froglogic Squish and Opkey. See our Katalon Studio vs. UiPath Test Suite report.
See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
