• Home
  • Neo4j Graph Database vs. Oracle NoSQL

Neo4j Graph Database vs Oracle NoSQL comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Neo4j Logo

Neo4j Graph Database

Read 3 Neo4j Graph Database reviews
1,142 views|743 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Oracle Logo

Oracle NoSQL

Read 7 Oracle NoSQL reviews
1,346 views|1,096 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
NoSQL Databases
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Neo4j Graph Database and Oracle NoSQL based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases.
To learn more, read our detailed NoSQL Databases Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Seon Hwang
Lots of training and documentation and excellent performance
We have seen that it has helped the way our company functions and sped up results.
GLEDSONCOOPER
The implementation is simple and only takes 15 to 30 minutes
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Enables people to understand what the business problem is and how the technology helps.""As a graph database, I am surprised at their performance and response time.""Creates the ability to visualize outputs."

More Neo4j Graph Database Pros →

"The product meets expectations when it comes to stability.""NoSQL has high availability. I think it's perfect from a technical perspective. It's quick to run and go.""The tool performs well.""The tool is easy to learn."

More Oracle NoSQL Pros →

Cons
"There are concerns about performance and whether the tool can necessarily scale to provide the solution.""So far, we have not had any issues and are happy with the product in general."

More Neo4j Graph Database Cons →

"Handling big data in a user-friendly way is currently a bit of an issue. The dashboard for this needs some work.""The installation is difficult.""The licensing model is bad.""Oracle could improve how NoSQL works in containers. I don't think NoSQL needs any new features, but I want to see new features in the Oracle Cloud Infrastructure. I would like to see some improvements in OCI's building options."

More Oracle NoSQL Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The product is expensive and Oracle could work to lower the licensing cost."

    • More Oracle NoSQL Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about Neo4j Graph Database?
    Top Answer:As a graph database, I am surprised at their performance and response time.
    Read all 2 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Neo4j?
    Top Answer:I don't have information about the license fee amount. That said, I know that the Neo4j license fee is more expensive than a local solution. There aren't really any extra costs. However, if we need a… more »
    What needs improvement with Neo4j Graph Database?
    Top Answer:So far, we have not had any issues and are happy with the product in general.
    Read all 2 answers   →
    What do you like most about Oracle NoSQL?
    Top Answer:The tool is easy to learn.
    Read all 4 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle NoSQL?
    Top Answer:If the use cases change, the cost could be reduced.
    Read all 2 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Oracle NoSQL?
    Top Answer:The product must be added to a cloud platform. The link to Oracle must be provided on the cloud platform. It will help people to integrate the tool easily. We need the solution mainly for updating or… more »
    Read all 4 answers   →
    Ranking
    7th
    out of 18 in NoSQL Databases
    Views
    1,142
    Comparisons
    743
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    872
    Rating
    9.0
    8th
    out of 18 in NoSQL Databases
    Views
    1,346
    Comparisons
    1,096
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    342
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Neo4j
    Oracle
    Overview

    Neo4j is the graph database solution allowing the analysis of complex relationships and patterns in data, leading to better decision-making and improved business processes. The graph database offers easy data integration from multiple sources, providing a more comprehensive view. 

    The most valuable aspect of a graph database is its performance and response time, as it does not use the join function and only has nodes and raw data. Overall, Neo4j, as a global first-ranking solution, has helped organizations become more efficient and effective in data analysis and decision-making processes.

    The Oracle NoSQL Database (ONDB) provides network-accessible multiterabyte distributed key/value pair storage with predictable latency. Data is stored in a very flexible key-value format, where the key consists of the combination of a major and minor key (represented as a string) and an associated value (represented as a JSON data format or opaque set of bytes). It offers full Create, Read, Update and Delete (CRUD) operations, with adjustable durability and consistency guarantees. It also provides powerful and flexible transactional model that eases the application development.

    The Oracle NoSQL Database is designed to be a highly available and extremely scalable system, with predictable levels of throughput and latency, while requiring minimal administrative interaction.

    For more information on Oracle NoSQL Database, visit Oracle.com

    Sample Customers
    Walmart, Telenor, Wazoku, Adidas, Cerved, GameSys, eBay, Schleich, ICIJ, die Bayerisch, Megree, InfoJobs, LinkedIn
    Airbus, Globacom, WebAction
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    University8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government8%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise65%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise71%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise56%
    Buyer's Guide
    NoSQL Databases
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Neo4j Graph Database is ranked 7th in NoSQL Databases with 3 reviews while Oracle NoSQL is ranked 8th in NoSQL Databases with 7 reviews. Neo4j Graph Database is rated 8.4, while Oracle NoSQL is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Neo4j Graph Database writes "Lots of training and documentation and excellent performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle NoSQL writes "The implementation is simple and only takes 15 to 30 minutes". Neo4j Graph Database is most compared with MongoDB, Cassandra, Accumulo, SingleStore and ScyllaDB, whereas Oracle NoSQL is most compared with MongoDB, Cassandra, ScyllaDB, InfluxDB and Couchbase.

    See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.

    We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.