We performed a comparison between Microsoft Virtual Server and Tintri VMstore T7000 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Citrix, Microsoft, VMware and others in Application Virtualization."We use the solution for internal business purposes."
"The dashboard is valuable to us."
"Microsoft Virtual Server is a stable and easy-to-use solution."
"The standout features are its seamless network integration, robust data restoration capabilities, and versatile computing functions."
"The solution is good at allowing end users to connect anytime and anywhere."
"The tool's most valuable feature is its workload. Its integration with Microsoft products is good."
"It is a scalable solution...I followed some online tutorials, because of which I did not face any technical issues or the need to contact the solution's technical support."
"The greatest aspect of the solution is its capability to be available from anywhere."
"We love the real-time replication, ease of use when connecting our servers to the storage, and the level of redundancy inside the box... It's also simple software and integrates well with VMware so we get a lot of information about all of the VMs, how they're performing individually, and about network latency. That's very helpful when you're troubleshooting a slowdown."
"I've worked on both EMC and NetApp SANs, and this is by far the easiest system to maintain"
"Tintri VMstore is rock solid. We have not had a single issue with stability. It is also very low maintenance allowing us to concentrate on project work."
"Support from our vendor and Tintri are brilliant. They have always answered all of our questions promptly."
"You can control resources on a per VM basis to ensure that contention in resources does not hamper performance."
"Upgrades are super easy and can be done during business hours without interruptions in production."
"A very good support team that is available 24/7. They have real technical staff with strong knowledge."
"The data encryption feature adds a valuable security enhancement with no impact on performance."
"Sometimes, it can cause a lag. It depends on the operating system and the working machine."
"The product must reduce the cost by 40%."
"The product must provide better data analytics."
"Microsoft Virtual Server should improve its network performance."
"The security performance and cost."
"There could be more security features included in the product."
"In terms of what could be improved, pricing is always too high of course."
"They should introduce a way to localize the currency for product pricing."
"What I feel would be nice, in terms of a wishlist, is scalability. Rather than replacing the whole appliance, I would like to be able to just add another unit and scale it like that."
"Their support staff just doesn't have the experience with all of the products that we're running. They don't know the 850 series like we do because it's five years old. There is a little bit of a gap, and that may just be because we're an old customer running on platforms that their staff hasn't seen. I would like to see an improvement in their in-depth knowledge of their older products."
"The biggest area for improvement, and there has been some roadmap work in this area already, is cloud integration... Tintri has been investing in this area and I'm sure will continue to, but cloud integration has been the biggest area that we've been crossing our fingers and hoping for quick development around."
"Active/active cluster between two Tintris on Hyper-V cluster."
"Speed of our VDI machines. We have a very high log in and log out ratio and machines are being refreshed instantly so we have a constant boot storm on our storage."
"It would be beneficial if Tintri could identify issues through telemetry and notify us before we need to contact them."
"Tintri's Cloud Connector currently only goes to AWS and IBM Cloud, and we don't use either because we're Microsoft Silver Partners. It would be great to get the Cloud Connector feature with Azure. If it's not already on Tintri's roadmap, that's something I'd like to see."
"I think with the world soon becoming only SSD, possibly NVMe, and 3D Xpoint. It would make sense for Tintri to drop the hybrid array down the line."
Microsoft Virtual Server is ranked 3rd in Application Virtualization with 35 reviews while Tintri VMstore T7000 is ranked 14th in All-Flash Storage with 61 reviews. Microsoft Virtual Server is rated 8.2, while Tintri VMstore T7000 is rated 9.4. The top reviewer of Microsoft Virtual Server writes "Easy to use but challenges with desktop version and lags ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tintri VMstore T7000 writes "We were able to push a button—it really is that simple—and flip primary and secondary storage locations". Microsoft Virtual Server is most compared with , whereas Tintri VMstore T7000 is most compared with Pure Storage FlashArray, Dell PowerStore, HPE Nimble Storage, VMware vSAN and NetApp AFF.
We monitor all Application Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
